Aggregator
Treasury Bars Scammy ESG Funds From Trump Accounts, Citing Left-Wing 'Political Activism' Concerns
The Treasury Department is moving forward with rules that would exclude investment funds built around scammy, globalist environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria from Trump Accounts.
Fox Business reports that under the newly proposed framework, qualifying indexes would need to track broad segments of US or global equity markets using objective financial criteria, rather than criteria crafted by social justice warriors who seek to make the West energy-poor.
"Corporate America has rejected ESG ideology, and we will not allow it to be a part of Trump Accounts," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the outlet in a statement.
Treasury Department bars ESG funds from Trump Accounts, citing 'political activism' concerns: https://t.co/pRvofRHZB3
( TS: Aug 21 2026, 1:21 PM ET ) pic.twitter.com/FmVLgAhwbR
ESG scores have been hijacked and "weaponized" by social justice warriors over the years. For instance, large tobacco companies have received higher ESG scores than Elon Musk's Tesla.
The ESG Ruse Continues: Legacy Tobacco Companies Are Posting Higher ESG Scores Than EV Maker Tesla https://t.co/jlOisi3UNJ
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 15, 2023"Exxon is rated top ten best in world for environment, social & governance (ESG) by S&P 500, while Tesla didn't make the list!" Elon Musk wrote on X several years ago.
Musk is right...
Meanwhile, earlier this year, the ESG ruse continued with MSCI's decision to assign SpaceX the "lowest possible ESG rating," while Big Oil and defense companies scored high on the list.
ESG investing has drawn criticism from Republicans who say these funds incorporate ESG standards that may subordinate investor returns to political priorities.
Trump Accounts launched on July 4 and have attracted more than 7 million registrations, the outlet said, citing a Treasury spokeswoman. More than 2 million enrolled children are eligible for a $1,000 federal contribution.
James Lindsay, the author of "Race Marxism" and other books challenging woke narratives, has noted that ESG is merely a weapon in the hands of "social justice warriors" seeking to shake down corporations and a tool for those attempting to impose a "one-world government."
Tyler Durden Sat, 08/22/2026 - 16:55Judge denies Karmelo Anthony’s request for new trial in Austin Metcalf murder case
Former football standout identified as teen shot dead at Bakersfield high school game as 15-year-old arrested
Traffic in the Strait of Hormuz skyrockets nearly 400%, as analysts say Iran’s grip on critical waterway weakens
Traffic cameras could return as California city battles ‘epidemic’ of dangerous drivers
Dodgers have competition atop The Post’s latest MLB Power Rankings
Fantasy baseball: Mason Montgomery leads widely available bullpen arms
Jeremiyah Love’s girlfriend roasts trolls over $300K Lamborghini gift: ‘Could probably quit my job’
Giancarlo Stanton deserves a Bill Walton-like ending to his Yankees story after years of injury snark
News of the World: What you missed this week internationally
Luka Dončić’s Lakers future thrown into question amid insider’s rival team report
Bret Michaels abruptly cancels remaining 2026 shows after kidney stone surgery
Bret Michaels abruptly cancels remaining 2026 shows after kidney stone surgery
Justin Trudeau is embarrassing himself with his Katy Perry relationship
Liberty’s Breanna Stewart bullish on ‘superpower’ WNBA must protect as trans athlete debate sparks rallies
Evaluating crowded running back depth charts is crucial for selecting fantasy ball carriers
Waste Of The Day: Millionaire Mortgages
Authored by Jeremy Portnoy via RealClearInvestigations,
The Department of Agriculture's Section 502 loan programs help low-income families buy homes with mortgages that don't require a down payment. But in 2013, an investigation by Reuters found dozens of millionaires took advantage to purchase vacation and rental homes.
Though the millionaires later repaid their loans, the program as a whole covered $500 million in losses from defaults in 2013, or $715 million in today's money.
That's according to the "Wastebook" reporting published by the late U.S. Senator Dr. Tom Coburn. For years, these reports shined a white-hot spotlight on federal frauds and taxpayer abuses.
Coburn, the legendary U.S. Senator from Oklahoma, earned the nickname "Dr. No" by stopping thousands of pork-barrel projects using the Senate rules. Projects that he couldn't stop, Coburn included in his oversight reports.
Coburn's Wastebook 2013 included 100 examples of outrageous spending worth nearly $30 billion, including the loans for millionaires.
Search all federal, state and local salaries and vendor spending with the world's largest government spending database at OpenTheBooks.com.
Key facts: Reuters analyzed mortgage records from 2003 to 2011 and found more than 180 USDA-backed loans went to borrowers who reported annual incomes above $500,000. That was an apparent violation of the program rules. Loans were only meant for buyers whose income was not above the median income of their community.
The records showed at least 500 USDA-backed mortgages worth $500,000 or more, including more than 90 exceeding $1 million. Loans appeared in resort communities including Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, California wine country, and the "thriving seaside enclave" of Ewa Beach, Hawaii.
One retired advertising executive told Reuters he used a USDA loan to buy a house in North Carolina. "I could have bought a house another way," he said, "but this allowed us to travel, and our hope in a few years is to purchase a beach property in Surf City that we can rent out now and retire in later."
The program's definition of "rural" was also generous. Reuters found at least 51,600 mortgages worth $6 billion in cities designated as urban by the U.S. Census, including places near Los Angeles, Washington, Seattle and Austin. Another 300,000 loans worth $38 billion were located in areas that "straddled" urban and rural boundaries.
USDA said the overwhelming majority of borrowers were the low- and moderate-income families the program was intended to help. The average applicant earned about $48,000 and borrowed $131,000.
Summary: There is a place for government programs that help families who cannot otherwise afford a home, but people earning $1 million per year probably should not need help affording the down payment.
Tyler Durden Sat, 08/22/2026 - 16:20