Aggregator
‘Deebo’s my guy,’ Mike Evans dishes on personal relationship with newest 49ers WR
Elijah Bieniemy getting mental health evaluation after allegedly shooting mom
Twisted Florida mom watched TikToks, porn while her infant was dying
Aaron Glenn making right play-calling decision after last year’s Jets error
Kamala Harris teases potential 2028 platform: ‘I know this is going to be controversial’
‘Wonder Woman’ star Lynda Carter stuns fans with age-defying beauty at 75: ‘Timeless’
‘Wonder Woman’ star Lynda Carter stuns fans with age-defying beauty at 75: ‘Timeless’
The promising intrigue around Spencer Jones that should sway Yankees’ deadline plans
Quiet California town hit with insane sales tax hike and there’s barely anywhere to shop
F-35 Stealth Jet Suffers "Mishap" At San Diego Airbase
A US Marine Corps F-35B assigned to the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing suffered a "mishap" at MCAS Miramar in San Diego earlier today, according to Fox News.
Viral videos have circulated on X showing the $100 million fifth-generation fighter jet in flames.
BREAKING: Emergency crews are responding to an aircraft mishap appearing to involve an F-35 at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in San Diego after the incident was reported earlier this morning.+
Authorities have not released details about what happened, and it remains unclear… pic.twitter.com/PqTBisE7Jo
Here's more from the report:
Emergency personnel responded to what the Marine Corps described as an "aircraft mishap" on the flight line at about 10 a.m. local time involving an F-35 assigned to Marine Aircraft Group 11, said 1st Lt. Blake Starbuck. The aircraft was based at MCAS Miramar.
The incident was a "Class A mishap involving a Marine Corps F-35B in the vicinity of MCAS Miramar," the U.S. Marines told Fox News. The pilot ejected and was recovered.
At least 14 F-35s have crashed or been written off in major accidents since 2018, including today's Miramar crash. Only one F-35 crash has killed a pilot, involving a Japanese F-35A in 2019.
Tyler Durden Fri, 07/31/2026 - 19:40How Taco Bell became the center of Falcons star Drake London’s proposal
Fernando Mendoza’s mom Elsa shows another city love when dishing on Raiders contract
Odds of magnitude 9 earthquake that would devastate West Coast spike after ‘unusual’ finding: study
Daughter warned her house was going to become ‘murder scene’ — then stabbed her dad to death: report
China-Focused Influence Program Courted Senior US Media Figures With Sponsor-Paid Trips
Authored by Arthur Zhang via The Epoch Times,
A journalist's review of Committee of 100 (C100) records has renewed scrutiny of sponsor-paid trips that brought senior figures from major U.S. news organizations to China and recorded changes in their views and professional plans.
A tour guide stands near a display showing images of people at locations described as vocational training centers in southern Xinjiang at the Exhibition of the Fight Against Terrorism and Extremism in Urumqi in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in China on April 21, 2021. Mark Schiefelbein/AP PhotoIn response to questions from The Epoch Times, C100 confirmed that it covered travel costs, selected the participants, set their itineraries, and chose whom they met.
The organization rejected journalist and media host Natalie Winters's description of the trips as "pay-for-play," saying no coverage was exchanged for the travel and participants retained editorial independence.
Winters published her review on Substack on July 28, characterizing the multiyear journalist delegation program as a "propaganda pipeline." Her report drew attention to documents posted on C100's website.
A 2012 trip report on the website marked "Internal Use" placed the cost of a nine-day delegation for five journalists at approximately $60,000.
The report said the program sought to improve perceptions of China and encourage participants to share their experiences with professional peers.
The five journalists represented The New York Times, The Atlantic, the Financial Times, Foreign Affairs, and WNYC. A page about the delegation on the C100 website says they traveled through Beijing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou from Nov. 25 through Dec. 3, 2012.
The trip report described lodging, meals, transportation, sightseeing, corporate and cultural visits, and about 20 arranged meetings with Chinese officials, academics, media representatives, students, and business executives.
C100 Recorded Changes in ViewsWinnie O'Kelley, then-deputy business editor at The New York Times, said she would return from the trip with several story ideas and "shape my staff across Asia in some different ways," according to the report.
Gary Silverman, then-U.S. news editor and deputy managing editor at the Financial Times, said he would not again "think or write about China" without reflecting on what he had learned.
WNYC host Brian Lehrer was described as saying his perception of China had changed "in 100 ways."
Jonathan Tepperman, then-managing editor of Foreign Affairs, said the trip had given him a "much deeper, more subtle and more nuanced" sense of China and elite opinion in the country.
He said he had made contacts he intended to continue consulting and called it the best press trip he had attended.
Clive Crook, then-senior editor at The Atlantic, said the visit reinforced his view of China as a "huge and fascinating story" and told organizers to "keep it up."
C100's report highlighted two articles Crook published after the trip: "Why China and the U.S. Can Be Capitalist Comrades" and "China's Ghost Towns Won't Have a Hard Landing."
C100's delegation page links to those articles, another Crook article, three Lehrer broadcasts, and a Silverman column. The page says the visit gave participants information and perspectives for their later reporting.
Shen Dingli, a professor at Fudan University in Shanghai who met the delegation, responded to the participants' assessments with a remark recorded in the trip report.
"You made the change!" Shen said.
Participants From Major NewsroomsC100 began its journalist-delegation program in 2007 and told The Epoch Times that it continued through 2014.
Over that period, C100 records identify participants from The New York Times, The Washington Post, NPR, PBS, Politico, Time, Newsweek, The Atlantic, the Financial Times, Foreign Affairs, WNYC, The New Yorker, USA Today, and other outlets.
A C100 account of a gathering of 2011 and 2012 delegates described the program as an opportunity for American thought leaders to witness China's development and challenges and meet officials, experts, journalists, businesspeople, artists, and students.
The 2012 trip report said the program sought to improve perceptions of China and expected participants to share their experiences with professional peers.
In a December 2012 message, then-C100 Executive Director Angie Tang wrote that the journalist and civic-leader delegations were "shaping the U.S.-China dialogue on the frontlines."
The 2012 delegation met Cui Tiankai, then-Chinese vice foreign minister; CCTV executive producer Cheng Yue; Sinopec Chairman Fu Chengyu; Shanghai financial official Fang Xinghai; and academics, corporate leaders, students, and local journalists.
C100 also held discussions with Chinese officials during the same period.
Its account of those meetings says C100 leaders met Chinese Culture Minister Cai Wu, Hong Kong Chief Executive-Elect Leung Chun-ying, and C.H. Tung, chairman of the China-U.S. Exchange Foundation, a Hong Kong organization established in 2008.
C100 leaders also discussed possible collaboration on the organization's teacher and journalist delegations to China with He Yafei, then-deputy director of the State Council's Overseas Chinese Affairs Office.
C100 Defends the Program"Committee of 100's journalist delegation program was an open professional exchange that last ran in 2014, during a period when the two economies were rapidly integrating [and] expanded U.S.-China engagement was the stated policy of both American political parties," C100 said in a statement to The Epoch Times.
The organization said the program was intended to give American editors direct exposure to a country often covered from a distance.
"The program's purpose, described openly for years, was understanding through direct experience," the statement said. "Participants disclosed their trips and retained full editorial independence. Nothing in the record shows anyone wrote or edited a story at anyone's direction."
C100 also confirmed that it independently selected the participants, set their itineraries, chose whom they met, and covered travel costs.
The organization did not respond to follow-up questions asking whether the claimed disclosures were made to employers, audiences, or both; requesting examples of those disclosures; and asking whether participants and their employers received advance materials describing the program's aim of improving perceptions of China.
Newsrooms Asked About Approval, DisclosureThe New York Times, The Atlantic, the Financial Times, Foreign Affairs, and WNYC were asked by The Epoch Times whether they approved the 2012 travel, whether they paid or reimbursed any expenses, and what sponsored-travel and disclosure policies applied at the time.
They were also asked whether C100's sponsorship was disclosed to readers or listeners in work connected to the trip.
O'Kelley, Silverman, Lehrer, Tepperman, and Crook were separately asked to verify the statements attributed to them and explain whether the trip affected any reporting, editing, staffing, sourcing, or broadcasting decision.
None of the participants or news organizations responded by publication time.
Arranged Access, Restricted ReportingC100's program emerged during an era when engagement with Beijing was mainstream U.S. policy. Chinese authorities, however, had long treated exchanges, hospitality, and managed access as tools for shaping foreign perceptions - a practice that continues even as U.S. policy toward Beijing has hardened.
On July 27, 19 media workers from Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, and Bangladesh began a six-day visit to Baoshan in Yunnan Province under the guidance of the CCP's Baoshan Municipal Propaganda Department, according to a Xinhua report.
The itinerary directed participants toward coffee production, historic towns, traditional crafts, cultural heritage, agriculture, tourism, and local-development projects.
Five days earlier, a Baoshan government account said authorities in Tengchong had trained more than 300 elementary school guides and university volunteers as local narrators tasked with carrying CCP theories and approved local accounts into communities and households.
Foreign correspondents trying to report outside official programs described a different experience in the Foreign Correspondents' Club of China's (FCCC's) 2025 media-freedom report, titled "The New Abnormal."
The survey found that 94 percent of respondents said reporting conditions in China did not usually, or almost never, meet international standards. Some 64 percent reported interference, harassment, or obstruction while reporting, while 77 percent said sources had declined or canceled interviews or required permission before speaking to foreign media.
Most respondents to the FCCC survey declined to be identified because they feared retaliation against themselves or their news organizations.
One unnamed European journalist said a Chinese Embassy invited the reporter on a government-organized trip to Xinjiang. After returning, the journalist was summoned by the Chinese Foreign Ministry and warned that subsequent reporting would be monitored to ensure it was "unbiased."
Another unnamed European journalist said police surrounded a reporting team investigating detention sites and prisons in Xinjiang, examined its cameras and phones, copied footage, and deleted material.
The FCCC said government-organized tours were occasionally offered in Tibet, but journalists who joined them reported having no opportunity to work independently. No surveyed correspondent received permission to enter the Tibet Autonomous Region independently in 2025.
The survey also found that 40 percent of respondents said their Chinese colleagues had faced pressure, harassment, or intimidation from officials or while assisting with field reporting.
C100 said the journalists on its delegations disclosed their trips, but it did not provide examples or specify whether readers and listeners were told who financed the travel.
Chinese police detain a journalist at a checkpoint on the road to the riot-affected Uyghur town of Lukqun, Xinjiang Province, China, on June 28, 2013. Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images Tyler Durden Fri, 07/31/2026 - 19:15Ex-Knick Mario Hezonja returning to NBA from Europe with Cavaliers deal
Cam Skattebo learned lesson from ‘dumb’ backflip fail after convos with Giants brass
Warriors reportedly keen on Stephen Curry, Kevin Durant reunion
Argentina's Milei Borrows Warren Buffett's Idea To Punish Deficit-Spending Politicians
More than two years after campaigning to "blow up" Argentina's central bank, President Javier Milei has announced his "Fiscal Shackle" bill - a permanent rule aimed at preventing Argentina from approving or maintaining budgets with fiscal deficits that could have consequences for politicians.
On Thursday, in a speech recorded at the Casa Rosada and broadcast nationwide, Milei proposed an overhaul that would restore the Central Bank of Argentina's sole mandate of preserving the currency's value, stop direct and indirect financing of the Treasury, provinces, and municipalities, and expose officials who violate the rules to criminal charges. "It will be considered fraud and illicit association," he explained.
Milei said this is the "most important set of structural reforms in the last 91 years," taking the year of the Central Bank's founding, 1935, as the starting point for that period. He argued that the central bank has functioned as "a tool for theft" and indicated that his reform proposal seeks "to put an end to the scam of counterfeiting money to finance high-level politics, whose most evident manifestation is the inflation rate."
The plan would also strengthen independence of central bank officials, making them more difficult for future administrations to remove. Milei said the reforms were an effort to end decades of deficit monetization, the primary source of Argentina's recurring inflation and currency crises.
He said the "Fiscal Shackle" bill would impose an automatic shutdown mechanism if public accounts remain in deficit and Congress fails to restore balance. Nonessential government functions would halt, while new spending, hiring, and discretionary provincial transfers would be frozen. Top political officials would stop receiving salaries, although pensions, family benefits, unemployment insurance, health care, and security services would remain protected.
"The results of the Central Bank's portfolio can only be transferred to the Treasury for debt cancellation. The scam of the Non-Transferable Letters will be eliminated... This will include the Fiscal Shackle: it will ensure that Argentina cannot sustain a deficit budget," Milei said.
Remember, the Oracle of Omaha told CNBC's Becky Quick in a 2011 interview that he "could end the deficit in five minutes."
Warren Buffett explained, "You just pass a law that says that any time there's a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election."
Tyler Durden Fri, 07/31/2026 - 18:50