Aggregator
Brooks Nader details ‘out of body’ experience trying on ‘Baywatch’ swimsuit as she films reboot: ‘I got this’
Brooks Nader details ‘out of body’ experience trying on ‘Baywatch’ swimsuit as she films reboot: ‘I got this’
Malaria Is Still Endemic In 80 Countries
Significant progress has been made in the fight against malaria over the last two decades, according to a new report by the World Health Organization (WHO). In 2024, 80 countries (including the territory of French Guiana) remained endemic for the disease, down from 108 in 2000. The number of deaths have also declined since the turn of the century, with the WHO estimating that 610,000 people died from the disease in 2024, compared with 864,000 in 2000.
Recent years have brought further milestones.
Cabo Verde and Egypt were certified as malaria-free in 2024, followed by Timor-Leste, Suriname and Georgia in 2025. To receive certification, countries must report zero indigenous cases for three consecutive years and formally apply to the WHO. Several other countries are in a similar position, with Saudi Arabia having recorded four consecutive years without indigenous cases, while Bhutan has reached three and Malaysia seven. However, none of these have yet submitted a certification application.
While Malaysia does not have malaria cases of the human Plasmodium species, it does report having P. knowlesi, a type of zoonotic parasite that circulates between monkeys and is transmitted to humans via mosquitoes. Turkey has submitted its application and is awaiting approval.
But, as Statista's Anna Fleck reports, despite long-term gains, there is still a significant amount of work to be done.
You will find more infographics at Statista
Malaria deaths rose by around 12,000 between 2023 and 2024, while estimated cases increased from 273 million to 282 million.
Ethiopia (+2.9 million cases), Madagascar (+1.9 million) and Yemen (+378,000) together accounted for 58 percent of the global increase.
The WHO African Region continues to bear the heaviest burden, accounting for 95 percent of malaria deaths worldwide. Funding gaps and the growing threat of drug resistance remain key obstacles to further progress.
Tyler Durden Sat, 04/25/2026 - 20:25Browns take another quarterback in 2026 NFL Draft to add to crowded room
Texas A&M-Texarkana track athlete dead after collapsing at event
Star LSU QB Garrett Nussmeier falls all the way to Chiefs in seventh round of 2026 NFL Draft
Giancarlo Stanton, Yankees waiting to make IL decision ‘not ideal’ calf issue
Super Bowl odds: Rams remain favorites while Cowboys and Bengals jump after 2026 NFL Draft
Kodai Senga running out of time to turn ‘flashes’ into more with Mets’ depth waiting behind him
The Final Battle For Your Mind
Authored by Casey Fleming via The Epoch Times,
Your phone buzzes. A notification lights up your screen—an article, a meme, a fun video, a flash sale, or the latest trend. It feels harmless, even entertaining. Just another moment in the endless rhythm of digital life. But beneath the surface lies something far more sinister. The seemingly trivial event is part of a quiet, persistent system designed to influence something deeply personal: your mind.
U.S. intelligence agencies have made the scope of this issue increasingly clear. Certain foreign-developed applications, particularly those linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), don’t simply collect user data in the limited way most people imagine. They gather extensive streams of information continuously—pulling from users, their contacts, and broader networks, sometimes extending to people who never installed the app. That data may be stored or accessed under legal frameworks that grant government authorities broad reach. What looks like ordinary app functionality can function as a large-scale intelligence collection system with strategic value.
This is no longer just about privacy. It intersects directly with national security.
The nature of conflict is evolving. Where adversaries once focused on stealing classified files or disrupting infrastructure, the modern battlefield includes the shaping of perception. Data is now a weapon of war—it is insight. It reveals behaviors, preferences, emotional triggers, and decision-making patterns. Aggregated at scale, it enables detailed behavioral models and psychological profiles that predict how individuals and groups will respond to specific messages or events.
When paired with artificial intelligence, this data becomes a precision weapon. Patterns are analyzed rapidly. Content is tailored, timed, framed, and repeated to maximize impact. Casual scrolling gradually shifts into structured influence, guiding users subtly rather than through overt coercion.
This dynamic is known as cognitive warfare. Unlike traditional conflict, it does not rely on physical force. It operates through control of information flows, attention, and repetition. The goal is not destruction but influence over how people interpret events, form beliefs, and make decisions.
Algorithms often prioritize emotionally charged or polarizing material to boost engagement. Over time, repeated exposure normalizes certain narratives while marginalizing others. Users believe they are thinking independently, yet their information environment has been carefully filtered, optimized, and weaponized.
A nation’s strength depends not only on its economy or military but on the clarity of thought, judgment, and cohesion of its people. When these qualities are undermined—through confusion, division, or eroded trust—the consequences extend far beyond the individual. Traditional cyberthreats target systems. Cognitive threats target minds. They aim to create doubt, amplify disagreements, and weaken institutional confidence, making unified action during crises far more difficult.
The implications are profound. A population conditioned toward rapid emotional reaction rather than critical reflection becomes more susceptible to manipulation. Trust in government, media, and fellow citizens erodes. Consensus fractures, decision-making slows, and internal divisions deepen. These conditions create exploitable vulnerabilities without the need for direct confrontation.
This approach delivers strategic advantage by avoiding the costs of open conflict while still shaping outcomes. By influencing the information environment, adversaries can steer public opinion, policy directions, and societal trends. Perception itself becomes a domain of competition (war).
At the core are three interconnected elements: large-scale data collection as a continuous intelligence resource, advanced algorithms as the delivery mechanism, and human cognition as the ultimate target.
In this context, protecting personal data is no longer merely a privacy matter—it is essential to preserving autonomy of thought. Cognitive security, the safeguarding of independent judgment, has become a national security imperative alongside traditional cybersecurity.
The situation is not hopeless. The effectiveness of these systems depends on access, scale, and awareness—factors that can still be contested.
Individuals can reduce exposure by reviewing app permissions, limiting unnecessary data sharing, and practicing digital hygiene. Awareness is equally vital: recognizing that much of what appears on screens is curated, not neutral. Critical thinking remains the strongest defense—evaluating sources, noticing patterns of repetition, and questioning emotionally manipulative content. In an environment engineered to capture attention, deliberate reflection becomes an act of resilience.
Policymakers must also act. Clear rules on data storage, jurisdictional control, and accountability for foreign-linked applications are necessary. Scrutiny of large-scale data flows tied to adversarial governments helps establish necessary boundaries.
The battlefield has shifted. Competition now unfolds in everyday digital experiences—what we read, watch, and share. The influence is often subtle, but its cumulative effect reshapes societies.
The central question remains: Can individuals maintain independent judgment when information is continuously filtered and optimized and weaponized for engagement?
Your phone buzzes again. Another notification appears. Recognizing that moment as part of a larger strategic system is the first step toward protecting your freedom.
The defense of independent thought will be one of the defining challenges of our time.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.
Tyler Durden Sat, 04/25/2026 - 19:50