Aggregator
One-third of parents with estranged children blame therapy — as society becomes obsessed with ‘trauma’
Chaotic Bodycam Video Shows Trans Florida Student Confront Cop Over 'Misgendering' Before Arrest
Newly released police bodycam video shows a University of Central Florida student confronting a campus officer over pronouns before being pepper-sprayed, tased, and taken away in handcuffs.
The footage shows Jarrett Vick, a 27-year-old blue-haired UCF student from Treasure Island, Florida, shouting at an officer who had arrived at a campus building on an unrelated call. The video was recorded in February 2025 but released Friday by the YouTube channel Inside The Blue TV.
"Why do you let those pigs get away with this? They are not supposed to be here," Vick says at the start of the clip.
The officer tells him to lower his voice or be placed in handcuffs. Vick responds by cursing at him: "Fucking try it. Are you threatening me? You're threatening me."
The officer calls for backup on his radio. "He is having a breakdown," he tells dispatch - at which point Vick screams, "She! She! Just say the right pronoun!"
The officer draws his pepper spray and orders Vick to calm down, deploying it when he does not. A university employee appears and attempts to defuse the situation.
"Get away! Fuck you! Fuck you, cop!" Vick shouts, and the employee walks off.
Later in the footage, Vick is seen stomping his foot and shouting "She!" at the officer, and asks the university employee to tell the officers to use the right pronouns, saying it is causing him a lot of distress.
"She, sheeee!!!!!" Vick shrieked. "Just say the right pronoun!"
He was taken into custody after being tased by a second officer, according to the video, which followed Vick attempting to kick and swing at the officers. He is then shown being placed in the back of a squad car. The incident is dated Feb. 5, 2025.
Approached by the Post, Vick said he had been "fucking harassed by the cops" and blamed them for what he described as harassment from the media.
Court records show Vick was charged that day with battery on law enforcement, resisting arrest, and disorderly conduct. He pleaded not guilty to all three counts. His most recent court appearance is dated Jan. 16, and Orange County records list the cases as closed. He is listed as male in his arrest records.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/21/2026 - 14:20Hubby turned in cheating Nashville cop wife after finding video of her having sex with lover in middle school
Ernest Hemingway’s legendary signature drink is ‘more myth than reality,’ expert reveals
‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ hits streaming—How to watch digital release at home
John Harbaugh has snarky reaction to Cam Skattebo’s failed backflip in Giants running back’s latest drama
Trump says Israel has begun withdrawing from Lebanon: ‘The world will take notice’
Cubs fan who slapped national anthem sitter ID’d as Vietnam vet — as he reveals what happened off camera
Gruesome photos of Celeste Rivas’ decapitated corpse shown at D4vd murder trial as her parents watch in horror
How much are last-minute tickets to see Ne-Yo and Akon on tour?
‘Alien chemistry’ meteorite that slammed NJ home is among rarest space rocks ever recovered
Designers are producing ‘adversarial’ styles meant to scramble surveillance cameras
Democrats can’t stop Kamala Harris — and it’s got the GOP giddy
Appeals Court Rejects Biden's Bid To Block Release Of Bumbling Memoir Audio Tapes
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,
A federal appeals court on July 20 ruled against former President Joe Biden, finding that he was not entitled to an injunction blocking the release of audio recordings and transcripts of his interviews with his memoir’s ghostwriter.
“Biden has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits,” Circuit Judges Sri Srinivasan and Gregory Katsas in Washington said.
The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, sued the government in 2024, alleging it wrongly withheld most of the recordings and transcripts from conversations Biden had with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer in 2016 and 2017.
After President Donald Trump took office in 2025, the Department of Justice said that it planned to disclose the withheld materials to The Heritage Foundation and a House of Representatives panel. Biden intervened, seeking court rulings prohibiting the disclosure of the materials.
Judge Dabney Friedrich of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in June ruled in favor of The Heritage Foundation, citing how the case “involves an unusually strong public interest in the release of law enforcement materials,” which she said outweighs the privacy interests protected by exceptions to the Freedom of Information Act, which allows requests for government-held information.
Friedrich stayed her order to let Biden appeal if he chose, and he did, leading to Monday’s decision.
A majority of the split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said that the primary question is whether Biden will likely succeed in showing exemptions to the act apply to the recordings and transcripts.
One exemption sought by Biden protects law enforcement records that, if shared, would reasonably be expected to invade personal privacy.
There is significant public interest in a special counsel investigation of Biden’s alleged mishandling of classified information, and because the special counsel relied on the tapes and transcripts, “the requested materials are germane to that interest,” the majority said.
The “extensive redactions” that the Department of Justice entered on the version of the records it plans to release help protect Biden’s privacy, and the public interest outweighs any remaining personal privacy interest, they added later.
The panel gave Biden until Aug. 3 to appeal to the full appeals court or the Supreme Court.
Special counsel Robert Hur’s year-long investigation produced a 345-page report, published in February 2024, that concluded that no criminal charges were warranted against the then-81-year-old president. Hur said the evidence was insufficient to prove a criminal case beyond a reasonable doubt.
A lawyer representing the former president did not return a request for comment by the time of publication.
Jeffrey Clark, vice president of litigation for the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project, said in a July 20 post on X that “we continue to beat Joe Biden’s heavily overcompensated lawyers trying to continue to hide the Autopen Presidency.”
Circuit Judge Florence Pan said in a dissent that she would have sided with Biden.
“In my view, Biden has shown a substantial privacy interest,” Pan wrote, adding that the interest of the public does not outweigh the privacy of Biden because many of the materials from the special counsel investigation have already been made public.
“Even if the substantial competing interests might ultimately weigh in favor of releasing the materials, there is no urgency that requires revealing them at this time,” Pan said.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/21/2026 - 14:00