Palmer Luckey's defense company Anduril Industries unveiled Thunder, an autonomous aircraft designed to deliver missiles, drones, electronic-warfare systems and cargo into heavily contested airspace.
"In this new era of maneuver warfare, we need eyes for what's ahead and a shield for what we can't afford to lose," Anduril wrote in a tweet.
Thunder is a Group 5 autonomous attack rotorcraft, meaning it weighs more than 1,320 pounds, as shown in the UAS classification chart below, courtesy of Piper Sandler.
Anduril noted, "A first of its kind for attack aviation. A thunderous step forward for maneuver dominance."
Thunder's modular payload bays can carry configurations including 10 air-to-ground missiles, 16 Altius-600 launched effects, or 76 70mm rockets, plus 12 counter-drone interceptors.
Pairing three Thunders with a single Apache helicopter could triple the formation's available munitions without putting additional human pilots at risk.
Anduril added, "Mass is only achievable if the platform delivering it is producible and affordable. The common dual-use baseline behind Thunder drives the economies of scale, expanded demand, and broad supply chains critical to drive down costs and de-risk the pathway to large-scale production."
X users are pointing out that Anduril just made the "tilt rotor version of the Terminator Hunter Killer drone."
So you made the tilt rotor version of the Terminator Hunter Killer drone. I guess I need to brush up on my counter Terminator skills because that reality is happening. What could possibly go wrong. pic.twitter.com/hFdmaXETj2
— John Cooke (@Marslauncher) July 20, 2026Other folks said...
It's game over when Anduril figures out the Ornithopters pic.twitter.com/hkdtmVbkXK
— Nathan (@higgsyxh) July 20, 2026Read:
Key drone players to follow:
Professional subscribers can find more war tech notes at our new Marketdesk.ai portal.
Tyler Durden Mon, 07/20/2026 - 17:20Authored by Jacob Burg via The Epoch Times,
Questions persist over what it means for drivers to have the right to repair their cars and trucks after President Donald Trump's recent memorandum, which aims to open up access to aftermarket vehicle repairs.
Rivian R2 SUVs move down the assembly line at the manufacturing plant in Normal, Ill., on May 19, 2026. The R2 produces zero direct tailpipe emissions as a fully electric vehicle. Scott Olson/Getty ImagesThe June 29 memorandum impacts a slice of the controversy between auto makers, car owners, and independent workshops over who can technically and legally conduct certain auto maintenance and repair jobs. The memo specifically targets emissions components that are strictly regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the federal Clean Air Act.
Automotive and legal experts who spoke to The Epoch Times explained what types of repairs the memorandum impacts, what this means for vehicle owners, and some of the potential consequences for the industry as a whole.
"What Trump's trying to do here is figure out, is there an alternative to let people basically work on their cars if it's something relating to emissions?" Joe Luppino-Esposito, federal policy director of the Pacific Legal Foundation, told The Epoch Times.
Narrow Slice Of Vehicle RegulationsRather than establishing a national right-to-repair policy for a wide variety of aftermarket vehicle parts, the memorandum specifically homes in on components used in automotive emissions systems.
The Clean Air Act prohibits drivers from tampering with emissions systems, including intentionally removing or bypassing a catalytic converter on a vehicle that was originally equipped with one.
Additionally, if an independent repair shop wants to use a non-original equipment manufacturer part in a vehicle's emissions system, the mechanic must receive legal certification from the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
The California board is currently the only organization allowed to certify aftermarket parts under the Clean Air Act's guidelines. In many cases, the certification process can take more than a year.
Armen Hareyan, founder and editor-in-chief of the automotive industry media platform Torque News, explained that the California board is essentially the "only widely recognized way" to prove an aftermarket emissions component adheres to the Clean Air Act.
This creates a bottleneck for certifications as the board is a "state agency with limited staff handling applications from manufacturers across the entire country, not just California," Hareyan told The Epoch Times.
"That backlog has created supply shortages, driven up costs, and slowed down innovation, while also limiting how many affordable parts consumers can actually buy," he said.
"For a small aftermarket parts company, waiting over a year and paying for testing before you can legally sell a single unit is a real barrier to entering the market," Hareyan added.
The memorandum directs the EPA to issue guidance within 30 days on what actions vehicle owners can take regarding emissions repairs or modifications while staying consistent with the Clean Air Act.
Luppino-Esposito said the memorandum may result in federal guidance that allows vehicle owners some leeway with "fine-tuning" or improving their exhaust or emissions systems, for example, in ways that wouldn't violate federal law but might otherwise be restricted unless working with a dealership under the current certification process.
Existing 'Right To Repair' LawsSome states have existing laws that provide drivers with broader right-to-repair access.
Massachusetts and Maine are the only two states that currently have comprehensive right-to-repair laws for car owners.
Under a law enacted in 2012, Massachusetts allows car owners and independent mechanics to have access to the same diagnostic data and repair information as dealers, including wireless telematics data.
Maine voters approved a similar law in 2023 that mandates standardized access to diagnostic systems and establishes a system for allowing vehicle-generated data to be shared through a secure platform authorized by owners.
Those two laws essentially give "car owners and independent shops the same access to diagnostic tools and data that dealerships get," Hareyan said.
Five additional states have broader right-to-repair laws that do not extend to motor vehicles: California, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, and Oregon.
Colorado's law applies to agricultural equipment, while the remaining four affect consumer electronics more narrowly. In California, manufacturers must give consumers access to parts, tools, and documentation for appliances and electronics, but not vehicles.
There's also the separate federal-level REPAIR Act that was introduced to Congress early last year.
Still under consideration, the REPAIR Act would give vehicle owners "access to data relating to motor vehicles of the consumers and critical repair information and tools for such motor vehicles, to provide such consumers with choices for the maintenance, service, and repair of such vehicles," according to the text of the bill.
Certification MonopolyThe memorandum also directs the EPA to "encourage the submission of, expeditiously consider, and act on any requests from organizations capable of testing aftermarket parts for conformance with the [Clean Air Act]" so that CARB is not the only organization issuing certifications.
It's not clear how this would play out or which organizations could fill the gap.
Hareyan said the Specialty Equipment Market Association, which is the leading group representing the specialty automotive aftermarket parts industry, has been advocating for years to have additional boards conduct compliance certification under the Clean Air Act.
While the association could possibly step in to become an additional certifier, the memorandum just directs the EPA to "start accepting applications from anyone qualified," Hareyan said.
"The honest answer is, we do not yet know who steps into that role, only that the door is now open," he said.
Whichever organizations are considered for compliance certification, they must have a "proposed certification process for aftermarket-emissions parts [that meets] the requirements of the [Clean Air Act] and relevant EPA regulations," the memorandum states.
Clarification Of Regulatory PolicyThe last prong of the memorandum focuses on civil enforcement.
The document directs the EPA to "consider deprioritizing civil tampering enforcement actions against anyone who, in good faith, attempts to fix his or her own vehicle to its original configuration."
However, this appears to be merely regulatory guidance and likely would not serve as a legal shield to those who attempt to modify their vehicle emissions systems without the proper certification approvals under the Clean Air Act.
Rather, that section is more about changing the government's civil enforcement priorities, Luppino-Esposito said.
He compared it to the Obama-era Department of Justice changing its civil enforcement priorities over the prosecution of marijuana crimes, despite federal law remaining consistent.
"It's definitely not going to be a shield to anybody,'" Luppino-Esposito added, referring to a potential vehicle owner modifying an emissions system before getting certification approval but otherwise following federal law.
Potential Unintended ConsequencesWhat types of repairs the EPA will eventually allow following the 30-day guidance period is unclear, especially since any policy changes must still adhere to the Clean Air Act. Repealing or altering the federal law would require an act from Congress.
It also remains to be seen if the potential federal policy changes will significantly broaden what owners can do with their vehicles, beyond ending California's effective monopoly on the certification process.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (C) speaks as California environmental protection agency secretary Jared Blumenfeld (L), California Air Resources Board chair Mary Nichols (2nd R), and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra (R) look on during a news conference about the Trump administration's changes to vehicle emissions standards, in Sacramento, Calif., on Sept. 18, 2019. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Tyler Durden Mon, 07/20/2026 - 17:00The State Department has released a new 100-page report, "Cuba: The Capital of 21st Century Communism," which is likely to land as a bombshell for much of the public. However, for ZeroHedge readers who have been paying attention, its findings are far less surprising.
"For more than six decades, the Cuban regime has been the leading sponsor of radical leftism and Third Worldism in the United States. The State Department is exposing the full history of Cuban espionage and subversion in our country," Secretary Marco Rubio wrote on X, adding, "The American people deserve to know."
For more than six decades, the Cuban regime has been the leading sponsor of radical leftism and Third Worldism in the United States.
The State Department is exposing the full history of Cuban espionage and subversion in our country.
The American people deserve to know.…
The report details Cuba's historical support for guerrillas, terrorist organizations, and revolutionary movements across the Americas. It cites Havana's relationships with the Weather Underground, Puerto Rican militant groups, Black Power organizations, and fugitives, including Assata Shakur.
It also highlights some of Cuba's most alarming penetrations of the U.S. government, including former diplomat Victor Manuel Rocha, former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst Ana Belén Montes, and former State Department official Walter Kendall Myers.
According to the report, Cuban intelligence favors ideologically motivated recruits and develops assets over decades, often beginning with students at liberal universities.
At the center of the influence network is the now-sanctioned Cuban Institute of Friendship with Peoples, known as ICAP. The organization claims more than 2,000 affiliated solidarity groups across 150 countries.
Former Cuban intelligence agents cited in the report allege that roughly 90% of ICAP personnel are connected to Cuban intelligence operations.
Recall that six and a half months ago, we identified the ICAP as a central node in Cuba's foreign subversion apparatus. We assessed that ICAP functions as the intake valve - political cover for intelligence operations designed to cultivate long-term assets rather than short-term spies.
And even created this graphic:
The DSA appears to be a "partner" of now-sanctioned ICAP.
It should now make sense why DSA leaders are promoting "destroying America from within," and that the way to do it appears to be through subversion networks empowering overeducated, useful liberal idiots.
About two weeks ago, Mark Penn, the former Clinton adviser and White House pollster, used a Wall Street Journal op-ed to sound the alarm over the rise of DSA.
Penn warned: "Lawmakers, law-enforcement agencies and journalists should investigate the DSA to see if it is being funded by foreign governments and interests."
Only last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent addressed 65 nations in Washington, declaring and posturing that the fight has begun on the radical left that seeks to destroy the West.
NEW: Secretary of State Marco Rubio calls for the civilized world to unite against an "encroaching darkness," urging nations to defend what they have built and fight back against those who seek to destroy it.
"It is easy to destroy great things. It is far more difficult to make… pic.twitter.com/G14GjBSIXE
The report reinforces our December 2025 report, "Is There A 'Cuba Connection' Behind The Radicalization Of America's Nonprofit Left?" It lends new weight to concerns that foreign influence intersects with the US-based nonprofit sphere, far-left activist organizations, and socialist movements.
More importantly, the report shows that the State Department's counterintelligence focus is dramatically shifting toward suspected foreign subversion networks that could be embedded in dark-money-funded NGOs and far-left groups.
One of the State Department's assessments is that people should not confuse Cuba's economic collapse with its ability to run foreign subversion operations. The report describes the island as a node where Russian, Chinese, and Iranian interests converge with intelligence and activist networks operating inside the U.S.
Tyler Durden Mon, 07/20/2026 - 16:40