Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
Yesterday, as part of laying out the two paths I can see the economy taking, I wrote that beneath the surface, the American consumer is tapped out. The average consumer - AKA the "retail investor" - has been a key in driving the stock market higher the past half decade.
This morning, I noticed two reports that came out yesterday that add to the conclusion that this "retail investor" looks increasingly broke.
Yesterday The Wall Street Journal highlighted how rising prices and the highest interest rates in decades have pushed even relatively high-income households into financial distress. One example was a hospital operations director earning nearly $200,000 annually who accumulated $15,000 in credit card debt at a 26% interest rate. Despite making the minimum payments, the balance barely moved.
And the broader data confirms this isn’t an isolated story.
As I’ve noted, the percentage of credit card balances that are 90+ days delinquent climbed to 13.1% in the first quarter, the highest level in 15 years and the worst reading since the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. Total credit card balances reached a record $1.25 trillion for a first quarter, while average credit card interest rates have surged from 14.6% in early 2022 to roughly 21% today.
Delinquency rates have risen across low-, middle-, and high-income households alike. In other words, this is no longer just a lower-income problem. The financial strain is moving up the income ladder, which fits perfectly with what I’ve been writing about for months.
Student loan delinquencies have also exploded higher as repayment obligations returned. Credit card delinquencies have surged to post-financial-crisis highs.
Auto loan defaults, particularly among subprime borrowers, are sitting near multi-decade extremes. New data from Experian shows that nearly 19% of new vehicle loans now carry monthly payments of at least $1,000, up from 17.4% a year ago and more than triple the 5.4% level seen just five years ago.
Contrary to popular belief, these aren’t primarily luxury vehicles, either. Roughly three-quarters of the loans are tied to mainstream models, led by popular pickup trucks like the Ford F-150, Chevrolet Silverado, and Ram 1500.
The surge reflects years of rising vehicle prices and larger loan balances, with the average amount financed reaching a record $43,952 and the average monthly payment climbing to an all-time high of $770. While delinquency rates remain below 2018 levels overall, both 30- and 60-day late payments are increasing, with the most significant stress emerging among subprime borrowers, who face the highest risk of default as elevated rates and larger loan balances continue to strain household finances.
Meanwhile, as noted yesterday, the personal savings rate has collapsed back toward historic lows as households burn through what little financial cushion remains.
Consumers have continued spending, but increasingly through debt rather than income growth. What appeared to be resilience was often leverage.
The fundamental problem is simple: the modern U.S. economy has become heavily dependent on credit expansion. For decades, growth has been supported by ever-lower borrowing costs, rising asset prices, and consumers’ ability to refinance, roll over debt, and take on more leverage.
That model breaks down when real interest rates remain positive for an extended period. For years, I’ve argued that as long as rates stay near or where they are, consumer finances are only going to deteriorate further. Debt accumulation can sustain spending temporarily, but eventually higher interest costs begin consuming larger and larger portions of household cash flow. At some point, debt service crowds out discretionary spending. Consumers stop buying. Delinquencies rise. Credit availability tightens. Economic growth slows.
As the New York Post put it yesterday, Americans are “too broke to have fun”.
Nearly 60% of Americans say they don’t have enough money to make fun plans this summer — as gas and restaurant prices soar, according to a new poll.
Cash-strapped folks are fueling a “fun drought” with more that 57% of people surveyed saying “cost and budget” are what’s keeping them from having a good time, according to a survey of more than 5,000 US residents.
Overall, the state-by-state survey found 48% of the nation feels like they lack fun in their lives — and 12% can’t even remember the last time they had a free day to enjoy themselves, according to the study, funded by Dave & Buster’s and conducted by Talker Research.
And it will continue getting worse. Positive real rates (or something closely resembling positive real rates) act like a slow suffocation mechanism on a debt-based economy.
Every month that rates remain elevated, more households are forced into the same position described throughout the Wall Street Journal article: juggling balances, making minimum payments, delaying purchases, draining savings, and hoping no unexpected expense arrives.
The uncomfortable reality is that there is little evidence this process reverses on its own. Absent a meaningful decline in interest rates or some form of Federal Reserve intervention, the math continues to worsen. Consumers are already showing signs of exhaustion. Delinquencies are rising. Savings are depleted. Credit card balances are at record levels. Debt counseling agencies are reporting surging demand.
The longer rates remain restrictive, the greater the probability that what currently appears as a gradual deterioration turns into a full-blown consumer retrenchment.
And when nearly 70% of U.S. GDP depends on consumer spending, a consumer retrenchment quickly becomes an economic problem.
🔥 90% Off If You Subscribe Today. This coupon allows for 90% off of annual subscriptions and results in a 90%+ savings over paying the monthly rate for a subscription to the blog. You keep the discounted rate for as long as you wish to remain a subscriber. I will not be offering 90% off anytime again soon after the long weekend: Get 90% off forever
It also means that when the stock market turns lower, what is left of savings and retirement accounts for the very same Americans, shrinking, is going to put them under significantly more financial stress.
If this thesis is correct and the consumer continues to weaken under the weight of elevated rates and mounting debt burdens, I’d be watching areas of the market that have historically been more resilient during economic slowdowns. Things like bonds, gold, consumer staples, defensive sectors, emerging markets with less stretched valuations, and even the equal-weighted S&P 500 all appear better to me than momentum-driven segments of today’s market. That doesn’t mean these assets are immune to a downturn—virtually everything gets hit when liquidity dries up and growth slows. But compared to richly valued technology stocks, speculative growth names, leveraged trades, cryptocurrencies, and other risk-on assets that have benefited enormously from abundant liquidity, they could experience less downside.
If the economy is moving toward a period of consumer retrenchment and slower growth, preserving capital may prove far more important than chasing the last stages of a risk rally.
--
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.
This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions.
As of May 20, 2026 I no longer actively trade (read my story here) and my accounts are managed by recurring contributions to trusted third parties and advisors and/or recurring contributions mostly to sector ETFs. Such advisors, through individual equities, options, index funds, mutual funds, ETFs, or other securities, may have positions in names that I know nothing about. Basically, I could own or not own anything at any point, and not have any idea about it.
And all positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.
The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.
Tyler Durden Sat, 05/30/2026 - 18:40California's green-energy regime has hollowed out the state's refining and oil industry, leaving motorists paying the highest gasoline prices in the country. AAA data show the state gasoline average now north of $6 per gallon, compared with a national average of roughly $4.36 as of Saturday morning.
The result of political blowback in California over unaffordable gasoline and diesel prices at the pump is a retreat from left-wing climate policies that could offer relief to motorists, Bloomberg News reports.
On Friday, the California Air Resources Board voted to create up to $4 billion in free carbon allowances for oil refiners and other industrial polluters. This will help them more easily comply with the state's greenhouse gas limits under the Cap-and-Invest program.
Earlier this year, CARB proposed further tightening emission limits by removing 118 million allowances from the market to keep the state on track to meet its 2030 climate targets. For refiners, that would mean further reducing emissions or paying more for allowances, with mounting costs already pushing them out of the state.
The move will help contain gasoline prices at the pump and prevent refiners from leaving the state, especially after energy disruptions in the Gulf region pushed California gasoline prices above $6.
Take US oil giant Chevron, which recently warned that California is careening toward an energy crisis because of the Iran war, and that the company may quit refining oil in the state unless officials roll back taxes and regulations.
California is highly exposed to the disruption rippling through commodity markets, as it imports about 20% of its refined fuels from Asia. But as extensively discussed here, oil product shipments from China, South Korea, Singapore, and elsewhere have been disrupted, leaving Asian nations struggling to meet domestic demand, let alone export to California.
Chevron’s oil refining head Andy Walz recently warned that the potential for fuel shortages in California is his worst fear: “We have refineries in Asia that are having to cut crude, and so they’re going to make fewer products,” Walz said in an interview in late March. “What if San Francisco doesn’t have the jet fuel it needs? Or Los Angeles? Or maybe gasoline?”
Since California is disconnected from the U.S. fuel-making centers of Texas and Louisiana, it is essentially an energy island.
Walz noted in March, days after the U.S.-Iran conflict broke out, that tightening California's cap-and-invest program "made no sense when you look at global tensions right now."
California's green regime has produced nothing but disastrous consequences for households, making fuel prices the highest in the nation:
There are national security implications stemming from the green regime, especially for the state with the nation's largest concentration of military personnel and national security activity.
The retreat on climate targets by state regulators is a win for consumers and the nation, as green is nothing more than inflationary and degrowth, hitting working-poor households the hardest with unaffordable gasoline and diesel prices at the pump.
Elsewhere, the US-Iran conflict has forced left-wing states such as New York, Massachusetts, and others to dial back unrealistic climate ambitions.
Tyler Durden Sat, 05/30/2026 - 18:05