Aggregator
The surprising reason Lenny Kravitz works out in leather pants
News 12 axes scores of journos from Bronx, Brooklyn, Westchester and Connecticut newsrooms: ‘Dire’
Poetry Society of America chooses most beautiful word in English language
How to watch the ESPYs 2026 for free: Start time, award nominees, host
‘Lucky’ Cast Guide: Who Do Anya Taylor-Joy and Drew Starkey Play in Apple TV’s New Thriller?
Obama-Appointed Judge Halts US Visa Restrictions On Disinformation Gurus Accused Of Censorship
Authored by Owen Evans via The Epoch Times,
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a policy that denied visas and ordered deportations of “disinformation” expert foreign nationals whom it accused of being leading figures in the global “censorship-industrial complex.”
Last year, the United States issued a visa policy targeting foreign nationals whom it claimed censor Americans’ free speech abroad.
“For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on X at the time.
In Washington on July 14, Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg sided with the Coalition for Independent Technology Research (CITR) in finding that the administration’s policy likely “burdens” the speech of noncitizen researchers in the United States in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.
The group’s lawsuit alleged that the U.S. State Department had been engaged in a campaign of censorship against anti-disinformation advocates.
“What began as a visa-restriction policy later expanded, according to plaintiff Coalition for Independent Technology Research, into a broader campaign against noncitizens who work on misinformation, disinformation, fact checking, content moderation, compliance and trust and safety,” the judge wrote.
“The Department has since invoked that policy to bar individuals from the country or seek their removal, including leaders of CITR member organizations.”
In December 2025, the State Department imposed visa bans on five Europeans, including a former European Union commissioner, and anti-disinformation activists whom Rubio called “leading figures of the global censorship-industrial complex.”
“But when you turn disinformation into a weapon, a political weapon, a label that you can use to go after people you don’t like, and say, oh, anything that person’s saying is disinformation—well, listen, I read mainstream newspapers every day, or I watch mainstream broadcasts—mainstream broadcasts every day that I know are disinformation, okay?” Rubio said in a May 2025 conversation with free speech activist Mike Bentz.
Among those hit by the visa ban were Imran Ahmed, the British CEO of U.S.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), and Clare Melford, co-founder of Global Disinformation Index.
Their groups are members of the Coalition for Independent Technology Research, according to the lawsuit.
Rubio accused them of having “led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to censor, demonetize, and suppress American viewpoints they oppose.”
CCDH, a British nonprofit, researches what it calls “online hate and disinformation,” which it defines as online lies “weaponized by movements and individuals for their own political, social and economic ends.”
For example, in one report, it partnered with a major abortion provider, MSI Reproductive Choices, and highlighted what it described as “false claims” online that abortion drugs pose high risks to women.
CCDH also produced its 2021 “Disinformation Dozen” report targeting 12 individuals, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Joseph Mercola, and Sherri Tenpenny, as “top spreaders“ of COVID vaccine ”misinformation.”
It urged social media platforms and governments to ban private groups that traffic primarily in “vaccine disinformation” and to prevent groups requiring a Facebook disclaimer from existing as private or secret groups.
A 2023 Republican-led congressional investigation by the House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government into the Election Integrity Partnership detailed how “disinformation” efforts disproportionately flagged conservative content.
This included posts from President Donald Trump, Speaker Newt Gingrich, and other Republicans, often to justify censorship.
Carrie DeCell, a lawyer for the coalition at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, welcomed the judge’s ruling, which she said “recognized the serious constitutional harms this policy is already causing.”
“This policy punishes researchers for work the public needs, and the First Amendment protects,” DeCell said.
In a May 26 statement, CITR said that the policy “has created a chilling effect” across disinformation researchers.
“Researchers have dropped out of conferences and opted out of travel to meet with colleagues, shifted research topics entirely to avoid negative attention, and in some cases, even stepped back from affiliating with the coalition out of fear for their safety,” it said.
“The policy is affecting researchers in how they live and labor, with the fear of being detained or deported from the United States because of their work helping people navigate social media and AI safely.”
A State Department spokesperson told The Epoch Times by email:
“The Trump administration believes that aliens who are or were involved or complicit in censoring American citizens must face appropriate consequences.
“An American visa is a privilege, not a right. Specific questions about this lawsuit should be referred to the Department of Justice.”
Tyler Durden Wed, 07/15/2026 - 15:45Permanent Switch To Daylight Saving Time Easily Passes US House
The movement to liberate Americans from changing their clocks twice a year cleared a key hurdle on Tuesday, as the US House of Representatives advanced the Sunshine Protection Act by a lopsided 318-117 margin. While many Americans would like to stop the spring and fall time changes, not all of them are on board with the Sunshine Protection Act's specific approach, would would make daylight saving time permanent.
President Trump has backed the proposal, and the White House issued a statement as the House vote was looming: “This bipartisan legislation represents a popular, common-sense reform and would benefit Americans by protecting precious daylight during the evening, when people are most likely to be awake and active." Party affiliation didn't play much of a part in Tuesday's House voting: The aye votes included 193 Republicans, 114 Democrats and one independent. An AP-NORC poll conducted last year found 47% of Americans oppose the current clock-switching, compared to only 12% who like it.
Proponents tout the ability to enjoy more sunlight in the later part of winter days. The bill is popular among operators of golf courses, restaurants, retail shops, professional sports teams and theme parks.but that comes at the cost of later sunrises on those days:
This will be such a nightmare. pic.twitter.com/qrD03wxEdl
— Julian Mille☈ (@ATLAreaWx) July 14, 2026Opponents of permanent DST include the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, which says permanent standard time better matches natural circadian rhythms, which affects immune system function and other aspects of personal health. The group, along with some concerned educators and parents, say permanent DST would have particularly harmful effects on children. "Permanent daylight saving time would delay morning light exposure, making it harder for children and adolescents to wake, learn, and travel safely to school during dark winter mornings," the group said in a statement.
The legislation allows states to exempt themselves or an area of their state from the permanent switch, provided they do so before it is enacted. Hawaii and Arizona (other than the Navajo Nation in the northeast part of the state) opted out of daylight saving time in the late 1960s. Federal legislation currently allows states to opt out of DST, but they don't have the authority to choose permanent DST. Eager to get a jump on things, 19 states have passed laws that would switch their citizens to permanent DST if the federal government gives states a choice. However, the Sunshine Protection Act would make it the default.
remember folks: it’s daylight saving, not savings pic.twitter.com/TynurJXKCZ
— Grace Panetta (@grace_panetta) July 15, 2026The drive to end clock-switching has a long history of sputtering out. Last time around -- in 2022 -- it was the Senate that approved the Sunshine Protection Act, not even using a recorded vote but passing it by unanimous consent. Then it died in the House as legislators grappled with constituents who were wary of ill effects on health. It won't pass the Senate by unanimous consent this time: Oklahoma Sen. Tom Cotton blocked such passage last fall and remains an ardent opponent. A Senate staffer told NBC News that Cotton will urge Senate Majority Leader John Thune to let the bill gather dust on his desk.
Some Capitol Hill proponents aren't enthusiastic about its prospects. “I’m kind of digging the fact that we’re going to fix it, I hope,” Tennessee Rep. Tim Burchett told NBC. “See if the Senate takes it up. They probably won’t, but we’ll see.”
Tyler Durden Wed, 07/15/2026 - 15:25Dem Senate candidate, Rep. Haley Stevens’ pep talk mocked on social media: ‘Michigan way, right?’
Devils sign Anthony Mantha to two-year $9.5 million deal after career season
GOP’s Bruce Blakeman slams NY gas stove ban as ‘green energy scam’ that’s crushing construction industry
Premium $46-per-class fitness studio is leaving gymgoers with ringworm: reports
I tried Amazon’s #1 best-selling bathtub mat. Here’s my honest review
Disneyland fans furious after park quietly raised prices on over 800 foods and drinks
US Utilities Requested $9.2BN In Rate Hikes In Q2, Up 26% From Previous Year
By Ethan Howland of UtilityDive
Electric and gas utilities in the second quarter asked state regulators to approve $9.2 billion in rate hikes, up 26% from the $7.3 billion in rate increase proposals filed in the same period last year, according to an updated report released Tuesday by the advocacy group PowerLines.
In the first half this year, utilities asked for $18.6 billion in rate hikes, down from about $25 billion in the same period last year, according to data collected by the nonprofit.
The report comes as average U.S. residential electric rates increased 7.3% from the year before to 18.8 cents/kWh in April, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. As a result, “regulators face mounting pressure to scrutinize utility spending plans while balancing the infrastructure investments that a modernizing grid genuinely requires,” PowerLines said.
The utility sector appears to be entering a capital investment “super-cycle” amid growing affordability concerns. Backlash to rising bills has prompted protests by consumers and their advocates, as well as new state laws intended to tackle the issue.
The Edison Electric Institute, a trade group for investor-owned utilities, estimates that IOUs will spend about $1.4 trillion from this year through 2030 on capital investments. EEI expects capital expenditures will jump 17% this year to nearly $239 billion, from about $204 billion in 2025.
Some utilities contend they can make the investments without significantly affecting their rates. FirstEnergy, for example, is proposing to increase its electric rates in Ohio over three years by about $392 million — partly to cover roughly $2.5 billion in planned capital expenditures. The company says this will increase average annual residential customer bills by less than 3% a year.
According to PowerLines and public filings, other rate hike proposals utilities filed in the second quarter include:
- Dominion Energy in Virginia is seeking about $1.5 billion across three rate requests;
- Oncor in Texas requested the largest single increase in the second quarter, at $1.2 billion, driven largely by transmission and distribution investments to meet demand from the oil and gas industry and data centers in the Permian Basin;
- We Energies in Wisconsin is seeking about $606 million in rate increases;
- DTE Energy in Michigan is seeking an increase of $474 million; and,
- Consumers Energy in Michigan is asking for a rate hike of $456 million.
The proposed rate increases in the Midwest total about $193 per customer, followed by $172 per customer in the South, $135 per customer in the Northeast and $110 per customer in the West, according to the data from PowerLines.
Utility regulators will scrutinize the rate hike proposals in the coming months.
“These requests, while often approved at a lower cost than utilities propose, have a high chance of reaching consumer bills in some form,” PowerLines said.
State regulators approved 58% of the total costs utilities sought to add to their rates from 2023 through 2024, the organization said.
U.S. residential customers paid 18.8 cents/kWh on average in April, up 7.3% from the year before, according to the latest data from the Energy Information Administration.
Those costs ranged from 12.4 cents/kWh in North Dakota to 46.6 cents/kWh in Hawai’i. The other highest cost states for residential customers were California at 35.3 cents/kWk, Connecticut at 32.2 cents/kWh and Massachusetts and New York at 29.5 cents/kWh.
Eversource Energy’s Connecticut Light and Power subsidiary is preparing to seek a $503 million rate increase, according to a May 20 filing at the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority. If approved, it would increase residential rates by about 13%, the utility estimated.
CL&P said it would show PURA it has strategies to keep customer bills as stable and affordable as possible, while keeping the distribution system reliable.
Tyler Durden Wed, 07/15/2026 - 15:05Unhinged stranger shoves man into NYC train in terrifying random attack
Ukraine Shake-Up: Zelensky Sacks Popular Defense Chief, & IDs CEO Of Naftogaz As Likely Next Prime Minister
Update(1410ET): FT is reporting late in the day Wednesday that Ukraine's 35-year old defense minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, who has grown in popularity for his 'reformer' reputation and for orchestrating the ramped-up drone war on Russia, has been sacked by Zelensky.
The shock move comes days after Yulia Svyrydenko, Zelensky's prime minister, was forced to step down, and amid a big cabinet shake-up. Zelensky had previewed huge changes coming.
As to who might be elevated as new prime minister, Zelensky has dropped a strong hint that the CEO of the state-owned energy company Naftogaz, Sergii Koretskyi, might be next in the spot...
“The priorities are clear – preparing for winter,” Zelenskyy said on Wednesday as Kyiv braces for another season of expected Russian strikes on Ukraine’s energy grid. “Therefore, following all the consultations, Sergii Koretskyi is surely the most prepared candidate for the post of prime minister of Ukraine.”
This is already unleashing a flurry of controversy and commentary Wednesday, with pundits scratching their heads and questioning whether Zelensky is actually just playing petty and jealous internal politics - despite the narrative on the war shifting:
Ukrainian MPs say that Zelensky decided to fire popular defense minister Fedorov, in yet another cabinet reshuffle.
Many Ukrainians (and not just Ukrainians) see this as Zelensky putting petty politics ahead of winning the war.
* * *
Ukraine's 35-year old defense minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, has only been in the top military spot for six months, but amid a new Zelensky-initiated major cabinet reshuffling, the FT reports that the military's top spot has been targeted as the next leadership change.
The report has been issued just on the heels of Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko's surprise removal, upon which Zelensky in a statement suggested a broader government overhaul is underway. "Ukraine is changing its political strategy," he made clear.
The Ukrainian leader is "expected to remove defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov, the 35-year-old architect of Ukraine's wartime defence technology drive, after just six months in the post as part of a major cabinet reshuffle," FT writes Wednesday.
via the Ukrainian Review"Several senior figures close to Zelensky said the president had held conversations about replacing the minister as he prepares to unveil his new government on Thursday," the report adds.
The FT report suggests that the young defense chief's anti-corruption zeal is alienating powerful figures who wish for the wartime situation to be looser with less oversight:
"But defense industry officials, senior Ukrainian officials, MPs from Zelenskyy’s party and others familiar with the matter have said — some publicly — that Fedorov had been a barrier to interests seeking to profit from Ukraine’s vast wartime defence budget… Fedorov repeatedly blocked attempts to steer lucrative procurement contracts to favoured companies, which put him at odds with powerful figures inside Ukraine’s political and defence establishment, said people familiar with the situation."
And yet interestingly President Trump has of late issued positive praise of Ukrainian forces' accomplishments in the area of drone warfare against Russia.
Kiev has further been boasting of its drone tech, and is even seeking to market it abroad, especially in the Middle East where Gulf countries are hungry for better defenses against smaller suicide drones.
Fedorov has been widely seen as having rapidly implemented a transformative vision on this front. For example, earlier this week The Economist wrote:
Tensions simmered barely below the surface at a war-council meeting in early July. Ukraine’s military leaders had mostly good news for their president. Middle- and long-range drone operations were seeing continued successes. A campaign to isolate Russian-occupied Crimea was running ahead of schedule. But as Power Point slides were shown to the testosterone-filled room, the generals griped about missile and ammunition procurement. The focus of their criticism, Mykhailo Fedorov, the 35-year-old tech-savvy defence minister who is known—and occasionally mocked—for his Silicon Valley style presentations, responded in kind.
If it wasn’t for his emergency drone-purchasing decisions at the beginning of the year, which required borrowing money earmarked for salaries, there would be no Crimean operation to speak of. A witness to the proceedings describes “two different co-ordinate systems” in a clinch: “No common language, even if holding back from direct conflict.”
But it seems there's a lot of angst within military command ranks over the defense chief's reluctance to try and achieve parity with Russia in terms of conventional military hardware, which he might reason is a lose-lose pursuit anyway.
Ukraine scores another €300 million in European cash
Ukraine's Defense Minister Fedorov says Ukrainian defense companies will be able to get €260M to increase production, plus €35.3M in innovation grants
EU shows no sign of letting up on fueling the conflict pic.twitter.com/Qkb6JMgj6o
In the meantime, Zelensky had started the week by saying, "The Cabinet of Ministers needs to be renewed." He explained that "Each priority area of foreign policy will be assigned to a specific person with substantial experience who is capable of implementing what we agree on at the leaders’ level and what the Ukrainian people expect," he described further of an impending reshuffle. Who is next on the chopping block?
Tyler Durden Wed, 07/15/2026 - 15:04