Aggregator
Padres vs. Giants prediction: MLB picks, odds, best bets Saturday
NYC has spent millions on OnlyFans in 2026, state’s top 5 horniest regions revealed
Packers reward Tucker Kraft with $92 million extension in return from torn ACL
Ohio State vs. Texas Football: Channel, Start Time, Where To Watch For Free
Lovesick young men are building ‘perfect’ AI girlfriends in ‘dangerous’ new platform
Pressure only growing for Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson with new coaching staffs in hunt for elusive Super Bowl
Gen Z Has No Idea What 9/11 Is
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,
Twenty-five years after Islamist hijackers murdered 2,977 people on American soil, a young man in Lower Manhattan looked at 2,977 memorial drones drawing the towers in the night sky and asked why anyone would build a "fake" building.
He called the Tribute in Light the "Batman signal."
This is what happens when media and universities treat the Islamist nature of the attack as a political embarrassment instead of a fact.
?? Young American outraged by a 9/11 memorial action
2,977 drones, one for each victim, went up at once to draw a full-size silhouette full-size silhouette in the sky over Lower Manhattan.
The man did not understand what was going on and sharply commented: "We have enough... pic.twitter.com/6gkGbIbpRt
"We have enough buildings, bro. Why are they making a fake one?" The guy filming the video states.
Critics assert that education about the September 11 2001 attacks has been avoided due to the Islamist nature of the terror attack, leaving large parts of Gen Z with almost no knowledge of what happened that fateful morning.
Gen Z's indifference to Sept. 11 is inexcusable | RESTORING AMERICA by @SouthernKeeks https://t.co/vscKWQag7k
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 11, 2026Washington Examiner columnist Kimberly Ross called the indifference inexcusable. Younger Americans cannot be blamed for being born after 2001, she wrote, but they can be charged with treating the day as a bother.
"If you have the immense privilege of calling yourself an American, you have a duty to understand both the scope of loss and how it forced a titanic shift in our national perspective," she writes, noting that the dead, the jumpers, Flight 93, Todd Beamer's "let's roll" cannot be treated as optional educational content.
The vacuum is not accidental. Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia told teachers not to "associate the 9/11 attacks with Islam or Muslims" and not to "center the extremists."
Roughly half of that district's commemorative guide is devoted to "safe spaces" for Muslim students.
Penn GSE's "Teaching Beyond 9/11" curriculum, pushed into New York City schools and several state education departments, gives the attacks themselves a single paragraph, says the United States merely "accused" Osama bin Laden, and then piles on units about Islamophobia, right-wing extremism, and "avenues for solidarity."
Only a handful of states mandate real instruction. Texas just approved language tying "radical Islam" to the attacks; Democrats on the board called it an outrage.
One Navy veteran put the motive in the open:
What should be taught in every single American school is intentionally hidden and lied about by our own education system. They don't want them to know Muslims were responsible for thousands killed that day and years after by war. That's why people are stupidly voting for them,...
— megourd1967 (@ProudUSNvet67) September 11, 2026Others expressed consternation about the lack of knowledge among Gen Z:
If they don't even know history from 25 years ago, what do they know?
— Creature of Habit2 (@CreatureHabit2) September 11, 2026Generation Z is a disaster. They are completely out of touch and stupid. They respect nothing and don't study their own history.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana.
Media and universities are to blame, yes. But where TF are the parents on this? If my kids had no idea 9/11 even happened, I have failed. It's kind of a big deal..
— TheArmedGardener (@Cheeky1iam) September 11, 2026While that ignorance played out over Manhattan, New York's first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, stood at Ground Zero after families and first responders spent weeks begging him to stay away.
Giovanni Galante, whose wife Grace was killed in the North Tower, organized a petition that passed 100,000 signatures. "We don't believe in what he believes in, and we really want us to be left alone," Galante said. "This 25th anniversary is for victims and survivors... not have a circus around us."
Charles Wolf, who lost his wife, said: "This mayor is not serving us. He's serving himself." Monica Iken asked him to "respect us from 7 to 11 and let us have our mourning." Cheri Sparacio, whose husband Tom died on the 84th floor of the South Tower, pointed to Mamdani's chief counsel, Ramzi Kassem, who previously represented a convicted al-Qaeda operative.
City Councilwoman Vickie Paladino demanded he "not show his face at that sacred ground." The Port Authority Retired Police Association, which lost 37 officers that morning, told him the day was "not a political occasion, a photo opportunity, or a platform."
He came anyway. Cameras then caught him laughing with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez while family members read the names of the dead.
They're Showing You EXACTLY Who They Are...Mourner Walter Matuza, whose father was killed and who helped push the petition, said: "He showed up anyway. It does bother us." Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani had already said Mamdani's presence "offends" him and that the mayor "stands in direct support of the movement that killed their children."
Andy Ngo documented another face of the same contempt a few blocks and a few hours from the names: a trans 'activist' who regularly dances at Pride events ripping pages from a Bible at a 9/11 "direct action."
NYC (Sept. 11) — A trans activist who regularly dances at Pride events rips out pages of the Bible at a 9/11 direct action. pic.twitter.com/6qtsAyaIzO
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) September 11, 2026Sick. Just sick.
Meanwhile, 9/11 families have once again demanded release of files that the deep state has spent a quarter-century ducking. Terry Strada, after reading her husband Tom's name, asked: "How can it be 25 years and still we have no justice for the role that Saudi Arabia played in your murder?"
She said families had "proved that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia fomented a rancid culture of anti-American terrorism" and sent agents to support the hijackers. "For 25 years, administration after administration... chose to protect the Saudis instead of standing with the 9/11 families." She told Vice President JD Vance: "Stand with the families. Stand with the survivors. Stand with Americans."
The nephew of Lisa Marie Terry said: "For 25 years, the Deep State has hidden the truth about what happened 25 years ago. President Trump, you're our last hope. Release the unredacted files that implicate Saudi Arabia, while what's left of the victims' families are still alive to see it."
9/11 Family Members Demand Trump Admin Release Docs 'Deep State Has Hidden'A generation that cannot identify a silhouette of the towers has no grounding in modern American society. A school system that treats "Islamophobia" as the real lesson of 9/11 will not produce one.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Tyler Durden Sat, 09/12/2026 - 11:40"Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda": Hillary Clinton Gives Flippant Answer When Pressed On Patriot Act Support
Hillary Clinton attempted to wave off criticism of her post-9/11 votes this week, telling a Columbia University audience that Monday-morning quarterbacking carries its own bias and that relitigating the Patriot Act does little good.
The former secretary of state, who teaches crisis decision-making at Columbia's Institute of Global Politics, was pressed by a moderator on whether Americans were "served well" by the Patriot Act and the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and on what she remembered about the deliberations.
https://x.com/kenklippenstein/status/2098234790692446256?s=20
— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) September 2026"I think what you just heard is such a reminder about how difficult decision-making is in the midst of a crisis," Clinton said, speaking at a Columbia SIPA Institute of Global Politics panel titled "The 9/11 Attacks 25 Years Later: Lessons Learned, Lessons Forgotten."
"And that's the course that the dean and I teach every day, or every week, because hindsight is always perfect."
"But it's got as much bias as anything else. And so looking back and saying shoulda, coulda, woulda doesn't really help us," the failed presidential candidate added.
Clinton was a freshman senator from New York when hijacked airliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers in her home state. Clinton joined 97 colleagues in voting for the USA Patriot Act that October. Then-Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) was the lone no.
Days earlier, the Senate had cleared the AUMF 98-0. Across the Capitol, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) stood alone as the only member of Congress to vote against it.
That authorization became the legal blank check for roughly two decades of American military adventurism spanning multiple wars in the Middle East and multiple administrations, power lawmakers in both parties have since tried, and failed, to claw back.Gives
The Patriot Act's Section 215, the so-called "business records" provision, became the legal foundation for the National Security Agency's bulk collection of American phone records, a program the public learned about only in 2013 through the Edward Snowden leaks. Congress scaled it back with the USA Freedom Act in 2015. The authority finally lapsed in March 2020.
Tyler Durden Sat, 09/12/2026 - 11:40NYC mom demands answers after teen daughter committed suicide in NYPD custody — despite warning cops she was suicidal
NY firefighter goes viral after ripping into ‘anti-American’ protester wrapped in Palestinian flag near Ground Zero
Jay Glazer opens up on battle with suicidal thoughts — and how Michael Phelps helps him
Arizona vs. BYU prediction: College football Week 2 odds, picks, best bet
Underdog promo code NYPOST: Keep your million + 50% deposit match up to $1000 in bonus funds
Blank wall in NYPD’s Hall of Heroes a grim sign more 9/11 deaths are coming
Trump says Don Jr. has become ‘different human being’ since marrying Bettina: ‘A good sign’
Left-Wing Media Doxxes And Attacks Black "Rogue" Lindsay Clancy Juror
Critics say they have never seen a more egregious example of political groups and the media attempting to expose and destroy a juror for not making the decision they wanted.
During the Lindsay Clancy trial Judge William Sullivan sealed the identities of all 12 jurors until at least September 18th, citing safety concerns after the high-profile trial. An incident in which a woman was arrested for allegedly attempting to film and intimidate the jury added weight to the decision. Deranged feminist activists have been rallying for weeks hoping to manipulate the outcome of deliberations in favor of Clancy, a mother who brutally strangled her three small children and then claimed "postpartum psychosis" as a defense.
The announcement of a mistrial due to one male juror triggered a rabid fervor among leftist wine moms, leading to immediate calls for the juror to be doxxed, harassed and potentially "punished" for his refusal to conform to the wishes of the rest of the jury. Evidence suggests that a pro-Clancy group formed very early in the deliberations process, and this group pressured the few holdouts to give in. Only one man remained.
Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin tells @gayleking that the holdout juror was a Black man, whom she estimates is in his 30s. Devlin says after watching a video of an interview with Clancy, the holdout juror “realized that it wasn’t murder in the first degree,” adding the jury… pic.twitter.com/ZxFa2hgSsY
— CBS Mornings (@CBSMornings) September 11, 2026The problem for the political left? The juror is black, and they were hoping for an "evil white man". This revelation has caused liberal heads to explode because black people within woke culture generally rank higher on the DEI totem pole than white women. However, as everyone knows, when a black person leaves the liberal plantation these activists can become some of the most racist people on the planet. They would rather destroy a minority than let him "go rogue".
Lindsay Clancy supporter learns the lone holdout juror was a Black man—and suddenly says it “changes the landscape of the conversation.”
“I think a lot of us were assuming that it was a white man.”
Absolutely wild.pic.twitter.com/0vCiWsWrG0
New outlets and online headhunters have been scrambling to dig up dirt on the black juror in order to gain some kind of narrative leverage. Media sources have somehow obtained the man's name, though they can't release it yet without violating the court order. NBC published a hatchet job article outlining the jurors criminal history.
EXCLUSIVE: The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial had a history of domestic violence allegations, the NBC10 Boston Investigators have learned through court documents and interviews with family members. Read the full investigation here. https://t.co/qSjIiU8Og8
— NBC10 Boston (@NBC10Boston) September 11, 2026Defense Attorney Kevin Reddington's wife is apparently leading the charge on social media to undermine the juror's credibility. It's a bizarre decision given that the trial is already over, unless the goal is to intimidate future jurors in a future trial.
Kevin Reddington's wife is leading the slander campaign against the black hold-out juror.
You heard that right.
The wife of Clancy's lawyer is putting a target on the back of the one brave person who stopped her husband from getting a 3X child killer off the hook.
This is… pic.twitter.com/GXVuuzwWjM
The man's previous charges include a restraining order filed in 2021 by his wife, who claimed at least one incident of physical abuse. It should be noted, though, that all criminal charges were dismissed. NBC also dug up a $12,000 civil dispute the juror had with a landlord. NBC has not attempted to dredge up dirt on any other juror in the Clancy trial, only the juror who refused to accept the insanity plea.
It's only a matter of time before the juror's full identity is revealed, opening the door to a barrage of harassment from activists and journalists.
It shouldn't need to be explained, but the man's past is completely irrelevant to his duties on the jury. He was approved by the defense and criminal histories of all candidates are examined during jury selection. Perhaps Reddington assumed that the jury was stacked in Lindsay Clancy's favor and adding a black man to the list was the same as adding another sure vote. This explains why the lawyer acted so aggressively to have the juror pressured or removed - His "rogue" decision" is viewed as a betrayal.
This effort by political movements and establishment journalists to assassinate the character of a juror from a trial that has already ended represents a dangerous subversion of America's justice system. If future juries cannot make decisions based on evidence without being worried that they'll come under attack after the trial is over, this would mean the death of the jury based system.
Such a precedent would devolve into absolute chaos within the legal structure, and of course, vigilante justice to fill the void that follows.
Tyler Durden Sat, 09/12/2026 - 11:05