With March home prices across the US sliding sequentially almost 0.2%, and rising just 0.83% YoY, the weakest annual appreciation since July 2023...
... the balance in the real estate market is rapidly shifting away from a sellers' market. And sellers are not happy.
A near record 5.8% of all US home listings were pulled off the market in April, according to Redfin. That’s tied with December 2025 for the highest share since March 2020, when the onset of the pandemic ground the housing market to a halt and spooked sellers. April delistings surged 3.8% month-over-month, the second straight month in which they have increased. Prior to 2020, delistings were never as common as they are now.
Delistings are on the rise largely because it’s a buyer’s market. Many homeowners want to sell - but only if they can get the price they want. In many cases, prospective sellers test the waters but pull their home off the market when they don’t get the price or terms that make selling worth it. And with most homeowners in possession of sufficient liquidity buffers to avoid the need for liquidation, expect many more delistings as expectations for rapidly rising home prices crash and burn.
“Sellers are still getting used to the post-pandemic normal,” said Patricia Ammann, a Redfin Premier agent in Arlington, VA. “Prices aren’t soaring like they were five years ago–high gas prices and the rising cost of living overall is trickling down to the housing market, making buyers much less likely to bid prices up. Buyers know they have negotiating power, often offering under the asking price and completing inspections, but some sellers just won’t budge.”
The growing flood of AirBnB properties being dumped into a bidless market aside, Ammann noted that the most desirable properties still elicit multiple offers and sell above asking price with no contingencies.
According to Redfin, there are a few forces driving the trend:
Meanwhile, as the first wave of sellers is delisting, another wave of more motivated sellers - those who delisted their homes previously - are now re-listing them: 2.5% of homes that were on the market in April belonged to sellers who had pulled their listing in the previous 12 months, then relisted. That’s tied with the prior two months for the highest share since mid-2020, when many homeowners were putting their homes back on the market after delisting at the start of the pandemic
Homeowners who pulled their home off the market over the last year are increasingly trying again as they come to terms with today’s buyer’s market. As high mortgage rates and growing inventory continue giving buyers negotiating power, sellers are aligning with the realities of the market.
They were also betting on a stronger spring market, hoping for a bump in homebuying demand after a slow few years that were marked by sky-high mortgage rates. The market did improve in April as rates dipped a bit, though it slowed down again in May as rates jumped.
“Many of last year’s sellers delisted when they couldn’t get the price they wanted. Now, some of them are circling back, willing to price realistically and do what it takes to sell their home,” said Monica DiSchiano, a Redfin Premier agent in Austin, TX. “They’ve realized that if they’re selling for less, the next home they buy will cost less, too.”
Delistings Most Common in Atlanta and San Jose
In Atlanta, one in 10 (10.7%) homes listed in April were pulled off the market–the highest share among the 50 most populous U.S. metros. Next come San Jose, CA (9.3%), Los Angeles (7.8%), Dallas (7.8%) and Seattle (7.7%). Buyers hold the negotiating power in all those metros, meaning they often try to negotiate prices down or get concessions, which can lead sellers to pull their homes off the market instead of hitting lowball bids.
Delistings were least common in Pittsburgh, where 3.5% of April’s listings were pulled off the market. Next came Columbus, OH (3.6%), Chicago (3.6%), Cincinnati (3.7%) and New Brunswick, NJ (4.4%). Chicago and New Brunswick are two of just a few metros in the U.S. that are not buyer’s markets.
Bay Area Homeowners Are Relisting at High Rate
In San Francisco, 4.2% of the homes that were on the market in April were relistings of homes that had been delisted in the prior 12 months. That’s the highest share of the metros analyzed by Redfin. It’s followed by neighboring San Jose, where 4.1% of all listings were relistings. Next came Boston (3.8%), Oakland, CA (3.7%) and Riverside, CA (3.7%).
Relistings are most prevalent in the Bay Area because the local market is hot, fueled largely by the AI boom. Many homeowners are taking advantage of rising demand by putting their houses back on the market. Relistings were least common in Pittsburgh (1.6%), also the metro area where delistings were least common. It’s followed by Virginia Beach, VA (1.7%), Cincinnati (2%), Montgomery County, PA (2%) and New Brunswick, NJ (2.1%).
The list of the 20 US metro areas with the highest delisting rates is shown below.
Source: Redfin
Tyler Durden Thu, 06/04/2026 - 13:00President Donald Trump on Wednesday formally advanced a long-sought effort to make it easier to remove senior federal employees involved in policymaking, arguing the change will help ensure government agencies are responsive to elected leadership and the American people.
Trump signed an executive order implementing Schedule Policy/Career, or Schedule P/C, a new employment classification that places certain career federal workers into positions that can be hired and removed in a manner similar to political appointees.
The policy is a revival of the first Trump administration’s Schedule F initiative and is expected to affect roughly 8,000 federal employees.
According to the White House, the move is designed to address longstanding difficulties in removing federal workers accused of poor performance or misconduct.
The executive order states that employees placed into the new category would be “exempted from the adverse action procedures that make removals for poor performance or misconduct so difficult.”
The administration argued that some high-ranking career officials have remained in influential government positions despite poor performance or resistance to implementing presidential policies.
“Consequently, employees with significant policy-making responsibilities can stay in their jobs for years even if they perform poorly, engage in misconduct, or are unwilling to advance Presidential policy across administrations, making their agencies less capable of delivering for the American people,” the White House said in a fact sheet.
The administration described the reclassified positions as “at-will positions.”
Most of the employees expected to be affected occupy some of the highest-ranking career positions in government. According to the White House, approximately 97 percent of workers likely to be reclassified hold GS-15 positions, the highest level on the federal pay scale.
Supporters of the change argue it will strengthen accountability within the federal bureaucracy by ensuring policymakers can more effectively carry out the agenda voters elected them to implement.
The White House also sought to reassure critics that political affiliation would not determine employment decisions.
“These remain ‘career’ positions and the non-partisan hiring processes, competitive status, and other aspects of these roles will not change,” the administration said.
“Removal decisions will also be made without respect to political affiliation,” the fact sheet added.
Federal employee unions criticized the move, arguing it weakens longstanding civil service protections.
Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, called the order “a blatant attempt to corrupt the federal government by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.”
Kelley argued that workers could become reluctant to report wrongdoing if they fear losing their jobs.
“Workers who once felt comfortable reporting waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement at their place of employment because they were protected from retaliation will now be afraid for their jobs if they speak out,” Kelley said.
The administration’s action comes amid a debate over the role and accountability of the federal bureaucracy.
The modern merit-based civil service system was established in 1883, replacing an earlier patronage system that often distributed government jobs based on political loyalty.
The Trump administration finalized the rule creating Schedule P/C in February, but the policy remains the subject of multiple lawsuits filed by federal employee unions.
Those lawsuits contend the new classification violates the Civil Service Reform Act by removing protections guaranteed under federal law and weakening the merit-based hiring system.
The administration, however, maintains that the policy targets only employees with substantial policymaking authority and is intended to improve government performance rather than alter the nonpartisan nature of career civil service positions.
Tyler Durden Thu, 06/04/2026 - 12:40Authored by Ryan Gladwin via Decrypt.co,
Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase is rolling out a perpetual futures product for pre-initial public offering (IPO) companies, allowing traders to speculate on a company's valuation before its debut.
The first pre-IPO company to be traded on the platform is Elon Musk's aerospace company, SpaceX.
The SpaceX pre-IPO will be settled using the USDC stablecoin, can be traded 24/7, and all positions will automatically translate when the IPO is complete.
That means traders could make massive profits or losses depending on the difference between the pre-IPO valuation and the debut stock price.
"Pre-IPO perps are great to get exposure to private companies before they go public (outside the U.S. only for now) and to help with price discovery," Brian Armstrong, co-founder and CEO at Coinbase, tweeted.
It is worth noting that the pre-IPO perp product is not available for users from the United States. The Coinbase blog post explained that more pre-IPO listings will be announced "soon," including companies in technology, AI, energy, and space.
Pre-IPO perps are great to get exposure to private companies before they go public (outside the U.S. only for now) and to help with price discovery.
Now on Coinbase with SpaceX as our first listing. https://t.co/bQLLymd9wb
This news comes the same day that Forbes reported that SpaceX's estimated IPO price of $135 per share would make Musk the first-ever trillionaire. Reuters reported that the IPO is targetted for June 12.
On prediction market Myriad, owned by Decrypt’s parent company Dastan, users place a 91% chance on Musk reaching the milestone net worth before July.
Perpetual futures, or simply perps, allow traders to speculate on the direction of an asset via a "long" or "short" position, without needing direct exposure to the underlying asset. Unlike traditional futures contracts, perps do not have an expiration date—making them a useful tool to hedge bets across a prolonged period of time.
Last year, perps became the crypto degen's new favorite way of investing with the rise of decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, which allowed anyone to use the investment tool.
Coinbase's new product combines this popular trading method with pre-market trading—another common offering in crypto. Often, exchanges offer users the opportunity to speculate on the price of a soon-to-debut crypto token in what's called pre-market trading.
However, traders be warned: pre-market prices are often inaccurate and extremely volatile as new information emerges.
Tyler Durden Thu, 06/04/2026 - 12:00