Aggregator

Lively was dealt a devastating blow in the ongoing legal drama earlier this month.

Lively was dealt a devastating blow in the ongoing legal drama earlier this month.

A Pennsylvania man spent years trying to offload his great-grandfather’s trunk of old silent films with no luck — until the Library of Congress discovered it held the last known copy of the world’s first sci-fi movie. For years, Bill McFarland lugged two dusty trunks full of his great-grandfather’s old films to antique stores and...

Will This Atlantic Hit Piece Be The Final Straw?

Authored by Matt Margolis via PJMedia.com,

The Atlantic has a well-documented history of publishing fake hit pieces about President Donald Trump and his administration, and one wonders how many more hoaxes they can run before they get in real trouble.

Its latest effort targeting FBI Director Kash Patel may be its most reckless yet — and this time, the bureau is fighting back with lawyers.

The piece, written by reporters Sarah Fitzpatrick and Jonathan Lemire, claims that on Friday, April 10, Patel struggled to log into an internal FBI computer system while wrapping up his workday.

He quickly became convinced that he had been locked out, and he panicked, frantically calling aides and allies to announce that he had been fired by the White House, according to nine people familiar with his outreach. Two of these people described his behavior as a “freak-out.”

Patel oversees an agency that employs roughly 38,000 people, including many who are trained to investigate and verify information that can be presented under oath in a court of law. News of his emotional outburst ricocheted through the bureau, prompting chatter among officials and, in some corners of the building, expressions of relief. The White House fielded calls from the bureau and from members of Congress asking who was now in charge of the FBI.

It turned out that the answer was still Patel. He had not been fired. The access problem, two people familiar with the matter said, appears to have been a technical error, and it was quickly resolved.

The piece didn't stop there. It also alleged Patel has been plagued by "bouts of excessive drinking," claiming members of his security detail had trouble waking him on multiple occasions because he was seemingly intoxicated. It further alleged that breaching equipment — the kind used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams — was requested last year because Patel had been unreachable behind locked doors.

The FBI denied every word of it before the article ever went live. Attorney Jesse Binnall sent a formal letter to The Atlantic and Fitzpatrick ahead of publication, putting them on notice that the claims were "categorically false and defamatory."

This is the letter we sent to The Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick BEFORE they published their hit piece on FBI Director @FBIDirectorKash. They were on notice that the claims were categorically false and defamatory. They published anyway.

See you in court. pic.twitter.com/Ke8cqNh8hY

— Jesse R. Binnall (@jbinnall) April 17, 2026

The bureau's response was even more direct: "Print it, all false, I'll see you in court — bring your checkbook."

They printed it anyway.

Late Friday night, Patel fired back on X.

see you and your entire entourage of false reporting in court... But do keep at it with the fake news, actual malice standard is now what some would call a legal lay up. https://t.co/MfbHH8OtLv pic.twitter.com/kw5U3LrfMM

— FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) April 18, 2026

It's worth noting that The Atlantic was apparently the only outlet willing to run this story. Other D.C. reporters chased the same tips and couldn't verify them. They passed. The Atlantic published it. And now they're going to be sued.

This is what The Atlantic does. They publish outlandish and bogus stories that no other outlet will touch, which accomplishes the goal of giving Democrats and their supporters reason to insist the stories are true. The outlet’s hoax piece alleging Trump didn’t want to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because the troops there who died in battle were “losers” and “suckers” was disputed by over a dozen witnesses. Yet, the left still insists it happened—even after Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, admitted it could have been wrong.

Sarah Fitzpatrick herself has a history of publishing bogus hit pieces lacking sources and corroboration.

By the way, @S_Fitzpatrick is also the reporter who wrote the throughly debunked hit piece that claimed Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh drugged women so they could be sexually abused.

She has a history of writing hit pieces with either no sources on the record or… https://t.co/YnaE5llsJO pic.twitter.com/5HMYZVyYjl

— Megan Basham (@megbasham) April 19, 2026

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche both publicly defended Patel. Blanche praised Patel, noting he "has accomplished more in 14 months than the previous administration did in four years." FBI spokesperson Erica Knight added that since being sworn in, Patel has taken just 17 days off — roughly half the time taken by former directors James Comey and Christopher Wray over comparable stretches.

The Atlantic published a "bombshell" on Director Patel tonight that every real DC reporter chased, couldn't verify, and passed on.

Here's reality. Since being sworn in, Director Patel has taken a grand total of 17 days off — half as much time off as Comey and Wray — and he…

— Erica Knight (@_EricaKnight) April 17, 2026 Tyler Durden Sun, 04/19/2026 - 16:20

French widow Marie-Thérèse Ross, is back in France after a harrowing 16 days in US immigration custody.

Some Newsom allies have been taking a closer look at Xavier Becerra.

After the latest attack, at Kenton United Synagogue in London shortly after midnight, UK counter-terrorism police said they were heading up investigations into the incidents.

The Mother's Day collection will marks As Ever's first major launch since Netflix cut ties with the Duchess of Sussex's brand.

The Mother's Day collection will mark As Ever's first major launch since Netflix cut ties with the Duchess of Sussex's brand.

Berk burst on the celebrity scene when she famously represented Mel Gibson

Instead of canceling their plans to wed, the couple pushed forward under extraordinary circumstances.

Baby food brand HiPP recalled some of its baby food jars after they tested positive for rat poison.

“Robots today have the body of Mike Tyson but are still missing a brain like Stephen Hawking,” a designer said.

The US seized an Iranian-flagged cargo ship after "blowing a hole" in its engine room when it tried to break past the Navy blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, President Trump revealed Sunday.

Catching Print? New Feminist Trend Proves They Have Smooth Brains

For decades insecure women have used feminism as a vehicle to crusade against "body shaming" and male objectification - Which is essentially a war on men who dare to have beauty preferences. 

Nearly every feminist movement has roots in female physical insecurity, from the "fat positivity" movement, to the "slut walk" protests, to diversity requirements that are eliminating attractive women from popular media, to the "inversion" movement in which average women deliberately make themselves uglier "in rebellion" against the men who were never interested in them in the first place. 

It's no secret that female insecurity rules almost everything women do politically.  One could say that feminism is essentially the weaponization of female insecurity as a means to gain power over society.

The latest trend to spew from the bowels of feminist activism is called "Catching Print" - Activists claim men are objectifying and shaming women, so women should objectify and shame men...by staring at and rating men's junk.  The problem is, these people don't seem to understand that the vast majority of men simply don't care.

    

The trend is, of course, going viral on cesspool sites like TikTok, and it is being popularized by leftist media sites like Cosmopolitan.  But, it does offer a perfect opportunity to peer into the mentality of the lowest common denominator and understand why marginalizing them is necessary.   

The idea that men are worried about what grotesque feminists think of them is a desperate fantasy.  However, these dumpy ladies have that problem covered; they simply pretend as if men are up in arms about the trend and scrambling to hide the bulge in their pants from prying eyes.  As always, feminists build a strawman on social media and then tear him down.  It's sad, but this makes them feel powerful.  

Men sit with their legs spread for a reason - They're never worried about who is looking.  If anything it would appear that activist women are jealous of modern men's ability to remain indifferent to women's judgements.  And, to be clear, the idea of women trying to shame men into conformity is not new. 

Narcissistic females have been using shaming as a manipulation tactic since the dawn of time.  Almost every man in the world has been accused of having a "small unit" by a woman who was trying to distract from the fact that she is wrong.  Women invented body shaming, mostly to undermine other women out of jealousy.  Men's brains do not operate in the same manner. 

What feminists call "body shaming" is often nothing more than men have standards and preferences in who they date.  In the liberal west, women are applauded and rewarded for having extreme and often absurd preferences (6 feet, 6 figure income, 6 pack abs).  Men are demonized merely for not dating fat chicks.

As for the idea of creepy men staring at women, all men know that this is subject to circumstance.  If she finds the man attractive, it's not creepy for him to leer.  If she doesn't find the man attractive, well, she should probably get over it or avoid going out in public.  We have seen endless examples of what feminists consider "creepy", which includes men doing nothing more than glancing in their general direction. 

It's time for the ladies to understand and accept the fact that they don't get to dictate who looks at them in public.  By extension, men really don't care if women stare at them or the bulge in their pants.      

A key element of the feminist agenda requires women to pretend as if they are constant victims, crying about oppression that simply doesn't exist.  They then mobilize their smooth-brained movements to attack men for this fake oppression and "flip it".  In other words, feminists falsely claim bad behavior by men as an excuse to justify their own bad behavior.  It's a classic Marxist maneuver. 

However, this old tactic is not working anymore.  The methodologies of feminists have been exposed in recent years and men are wise to the game.  Female shaming techniques hold no power and men are shrugging off the attacks.  Today, men are more likely to whip out their "print" and slap a feminist in the face with it than actually care about her opinion.    

Tyler Durden Sun, 04/19/2026 - 15:45

Let’s just say that given the choice on whether to toss kerosene or water on the lingering embers from last October’s conflict with a segment of Red Sox fans, Schlittler did in words what he does on the mound — threw heat.

Desmond Levon Brown threw a woman's puppy into a fire in 2024 because she burned his clothes, police said.

DENVER — The wait lasted seven years, three weeks and, in the end, one final half-inning. On Friday night, Ryan Ward was on-deck at the start of Triple-A Oklahoma City’s game in Albuquerque when he was called back to the dugout at the last second. There was news for him, he was told. But he’d...

"This has to be one of the sweetest and most original proposals I’ve ever heard of!"

The financial strain is hitting Napa Valley at a particularly fragile moment.