Aggregator
Cristiano Ronaldo gets candid about ‘dark’ week that led up to historic World Cup moment: ‘As if I retired’
The Hollywood hack for thicker, fuller hair: Nutrafol is 20% off for Prime Day
The Hollywood hack for thicker, fuller hair: Nutrafol is 20% off for Prime Day
ESPN reporter in deep talks to join Hawks front office in stunner
How Can We Restore Trusted Elections?
Authored by Christian Milord via The Epoch Times,
It's mind-boggling that elections and election results take so long to complete, especially in a developed nation such as the United States.
A person votes in the Virginia redistricting referendum at Lyles-Crouch Traditional Academy, Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Alexandria, Va. AP Photo/Julia Demaree NikhinsonIt's inexcusable that our modern society can't establish firm timelines and expedite tabulation when many nations, both developed and developing, announce results on the same day as the election or within a day or two. Many of those countries lack the election technologies that the United States takes for granted.
In the case of very close elections similar to the George W. Bush vs. Al Gore in 2000, there was a need to proceed slowly as the razor thin election boiled down to the state of Florida. There was a recount wherein punch-card ballots were checked for chads and hanging chads to ensure the count was accurate. After five weeks, the election was finally certified by a few hundred votes in favor of Bush by Florida's Secretary of State Katherine Harris and the Supreme Court.
A number of reforms could be rolled out in order to speed up our election system so that results are accurate, timely, and can be trusted by the electorate. Voting is an important earned right that can't be handed out to non-citizens or be taken lightly.
First, voters should have a valid ID to vote, and a valid signature must be written, whether voting is by mail or at a polling location. More than 80 percent of voters favor a valid ID for citizens to vote, since an ID is required for many minor activities that don't rise to the level of importance as a citizen's right to vote. That is why the SAVE Act is so critical at this time as the midterms approach in November. Valid addresses, IDs, and signatures can reduce potential abuse and doubts regarding election integrity.
Second, eliminate the primary system in which a number of candidates vie for elected positions at the local, state, and national levels. It costs untold millions to campaign, mail out ballots, run polling stations, and tabulate votes. Why not have candidates compete for positions every two, four, or six years and hold the elections at specified times in the fall without the need for primaries?
Third, only mail out ballots to voters who request them. Millions of dollars are spent mailing ballots to every registered voter, even though many voters prefer to vote in person at polling locations. One can understand mailing out ballots to American voters who are working overseas. It makes sense to send it to these voters early to allow time for them to complete their ballots and return them to the United States. Unlimited mailing can result in unused ballots and could lead to some ballot harvesting.
Moreover, ballots shouldn't be mailed out so early in the election "season." Those who request ballots should receive them only a few days before an election, not weeks beforehand. Early mail-outs can lead to lost ballots, tossed ballots for those who vote at the polls, and possible ballot harvesting. Likewise, completed ballots postmarked on election day should not be accepted many days after election day. It can generate uncertainty for candidates and voters.
Fourth, make it unlawful for signature collectors or anyone else to pay folks to register to vote or sign on to potential legislation. According to The Epoch Times, this activity has occurred several times in California and elsewhere. Anyone who is concerned with the workings of government shouldn't receive compensation to vote for candidates and issues. No one, regardless of political party, should coerce or entice someone to vote in a partisan direction either. It taints fair and free elections.
Fifth, voter rolls ought to be purged regularly because people pass away, move out of the county, or move into the county as residents and register to vote. Mailing ballots to everyone can be a waste if rolls aren't kept up to date to reflect the current registered voters who still reside in a particular county. If the rolls aren't updated regularly, it can also lead to ballots being stolen or open the floodgates for people to vote twice or for someone else.
Sixth, although mandates wouldn't be effective at shortening the campaign season, they might help to make the campaign trail less drawn out. In most nations, campaign season runs for a few weeks or a month or two. In America, campaigning seems to roll on forever, and elections can feel anticlimactic. By the time one election is concluded, the next election arrives quickly on the horizon. Candidates even campaign while they are in office and constantly keep an eye out for the next election.
Prolonged political campaigning can be a distraction from carrying out the duties of representing the people and solving pressing problems that affect their lives. Media outlets can play a role in discussing critical issues more objectively instead of sensationalizing every minor action by political opponents or supporters.
Constant campaign mode can devolve into self-interest rather than the more important national interest. Americans need fewer promises from politicians and more delivery in the spheres of free markets, the protection of liberty, just laws, and national security.
Common sense informs us that in tight elections, tabulating must be checked carefully at a slower pace than when a candidate or initiative/referendum wins by a larger margin. For the most part, elections can be trusted if they are properly managed and results are released in a timely manner. If the process is lengthy, it can breed cynicism, and many voters might not bother to vote.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Tyler Durden Tue, 06/23/2026 - 20:55Four California cities make list of America’s newest boomtowns
Isaiah Evans wears $4 million worth of diamonds to NBA Draft 2026
Movie "Citizen Vigilante" Exposes Migrant Crime Issue And Triggers Outrage
The current political climate across the west is tumultuous and chaotic, largely due to one volatile issue causing deep divisions: Mass immigration. Not just mass immigration, but mass invasion from third-world countries and facilitated by liberal governments.
Leftists, driven by an obsession with multiculturalism and Marxism, desperately want mass immigration to continue unabated. Conservatives and centrists want immigration stopped and, ideally, reversed. Both sides refuse to budge which has created an explosive impasse. The debate is on the verge of becoming a civil war.
In this debate, only one side is correct. It is clear to the majority of western citizens that after a decade of migrant programs, there simply is no compatibility between European/American culture and third world cultures. These cultures reside in regions of the world where authoritarianism and barbarism are ingrained in the public psyche; they have no conception of western ideals of individual freedom, meritocracy, high trust or "tolerance."
They only view western empathy as a weakness that should be exploited. Meaning, westerners and third worlders will never be able to coexist. It's simply not possible without one side dominating the other.
In the midst of this debate the political left has had the most control over popular media and which message gets the most exposure. Pro-immigration and multicultural movies, TV shows and commercials saturate the market. If any project criticizing immigration makes it to the light of day, it's kind of a miracle. Enter the independent film "Citizen Vigilante".
Produced and directed by Uwe Boll, Citizen Vigilante stars Armie Hammer as Sanders, an American businessman and former US Army officer living in Europe. He becomes incensed by vicious migrant crimes and the corrupt two-tier legal system that consistently helps migrants escape punishment. He sets out on a mission to target criminals who avoid justice, along with the political officials who enable the crime.
Here is the scene in Citizen Vigilante where he confronts a judge who let a group of migrant rapists escape jailtime after raping a 14 year old girl
"Laws are meant to protect the victims" pic.twitter.com/5BlwH1TYxZ
The film is reminiscent of a modern-day Death Wish, a movie which was inspired by the extreme firearms restrictions in New York City in 1974. Restrictions that allowed violent criminals and gangs to run rampant without fear of citizen reprisal. To this day, NYC remains a safe haven for repeat offenders and lunatics and any private citizen who steps up to prevent a crime is prosecuted.
Needless to say, the Citizen Vigilante release has caused a stir. Progressives and Muslim advocates are outraged by the film's brutal violence against migrant characters. The German government has essentially banned the film from release, refusing to give it a rating or age classification which is needed for theaters to carry the movie. All the right people seem to be angry.
I’ll be amazed if this movie doesn’t get banned. pic.twitter.com/7lh1rDOijD
— Ian Miles Cheong (@ianmiles) June 22, 2026Leftists have attempted to run interference as the movie rises in popularity, with some claiming that Uwe Boll made the flick as a parody to mock "right wing xenophobia". This narrative has been dismissed by Uwe Boll himself, and he states that he is quite serious about the film's message. In response, the media has attacked Boll as a "Nazi".
The film is inspired by real world events, such as a 2016 Hamburg gang-rape case where perpetrators received suspended sentences because of their migrant status. It ends with a dedication to "rape victims in Europe who were betrayed by our legal system."
The mainstream critics hate Citizen Vigilante, which is a badge of honor these days. But is it really so shocking that the commentary within the popular zeitgeist is shifting to address a problem which concerns the majority of the western population? Did the political left really believe that they could engineer a foreign invasion without the public speaking out? Did they really think they could control the narrative forever?
Tyler Durden Tue, 06/23/2026 - 20:30