Aggregator
Tributes to Hayden Panettiere pour in following her death at 36: ‘Don’t be gone’
Qatar Denies Holding Iranian Pilots As Tehran Demands Answers Over Missing Airmen
Qatar has denied that it is holding three Iranian pilots who Iran says were captured alive after their fighter jets crashed during the US-Israeli war on the Islamic Republic.
On Saturday, Mohammad Bagherzadeh, head of the Missing Persons Search Committee of Iran's Armed Forces General Staff, stated that “Three Iranian pilots were captured alive by Qatari forces after the Su-24 fighter jets crashed during the March attacks.” He identified the captured pilots as Javad Salehi, Abdolmajid Dashtian, and Omran Behraveshian.
via Associated PressIran is urging the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to investigate the condition of the pilots. In a statement to the ICRC, Bagherzadeh said that the pilots "have been held by Qatari forces for six months" and have not been allowed to contact their families.
Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari denied the claims, saying Qatar is not holding any Iranian pilots.
"We categorically deny the claims circulating regarding the detention of Iranian pilots," Ansari said in a statement posted on X. Iranian officials were making "misleading statements" at a sensitive moment for regional diplomacy, he added.
Doha acknowledged shooting down two Iranian Su-24 fighter planes in March as they attacked the Al-Udeid Air Base, the largest US military base in West Asia and home to US Central Command (CENTCOM) personnel.
Qatar said its search and rescue teams located the body of one Iranian pilot, Majid Kazemi, following the incident and had coordinated with Iranian authorities to return the body, in accordance with international humanitarian law.
Qatar added that it had invited Iranian officials to visit the country to obtain details of the search-and-rescue operation, while claiming Iran had not yet responded to the invitation.
Amid the dispute, Qatar says it remains actively engaged as a mediator between the US and Iran and is pushing for a negotiated settlement to the war.
Negotiations are at a standstill, with Iran insisting the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the US agrees to its terms. Meanwhile, the US Navy is continuing its blockade on Iranian ports.
"After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated, pretty soon I'll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States," Trump hyperbolically claimed on Friday. "Essentially, that's what it is. We have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to."
Iran urges the International Red Cross to intervene and secure the release of three Iranian pilots who have been held captive by Qatari forces for the past six months after air defenses struck their Su-24 jets during a retaliatory mission.
Follow: https://t.co/gqNNnUKfG0 pic.twitter.com/K5CmPCGLiU
Tehran rejected the remarks on Saturday. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated that the strategic waterway "cannot be seized with a tweet, nor with an aircraft carrier." He warned that Iran would continue to enforce its closure of Hormuz until Washington accepts “the reality of defeat.”
Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, through which one-fifth of global oil and gas exports normally travel, in response to the unprovoked US-Israeli attack on the country in February.
Iran's closure of the strait caused a global energy supply shock that drove up gas prices, exacerbated inflation, and raised alarms about oil reserves across the world.
Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 03:30Dear Abby: I’m not worry-free about this child-free wedding
Trump blames vandals for dead grass on National Mall where he hosted 4th of July celebration
Louisiana husband allegedly killed wife, propped her body in passenger seat and drove through several states before being arrested
Israel Threatens Return Of Lebanon War After Unleashing Deadliest Airstrikes Since Ceasefire
Despite a June ceasefire technically being in effect, new weekend Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon mark the deadliest escalation since fighting largely came to a halt earlier this year.
The Saturday attack saw eleven Lebanese killed - among them three children - and 19 injured after Israeli warplanes bombed several areas. It's by far the biggest mass casualty event since the ceasefire took effect, also in terms of extent of destruction.
Flattened neighborhood in the southern Lebanese village of Deir al-Zahrani on August 15, via AFP"Israeli warplanes bombed a home on the outskirts of the village of Ansar, killing seven people and flattening the building early on Saturday morning, The Guardian reported. "Rescue services were working at the site to try to find survivors and locate bodies."
"Another airstrike hours later on a home in the town of Deir al-Zahrani killed two, wounded nine and covered the streets in rubble and smoke," the report continued to detail. "An Israeli drone also targeted a motorcycle in the nearby city of Nabatieh, but it was unclear if the driver was killed."
Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA) wrote of the fresh escalation wrote, "The Israeli enemy committed a massacre in the southern town of Ansar at dawn today, resulting in seven martyrs and three wounded."
Houses and structures across various villages were reported flattened. Israel may have been acting related to reported Hezbollah attacks on IDF troops early Saturday in which which three soldiers were wounded. It was said to be the result of an explosive drone sent from Lebanon.
Israel is threatening to ramp up its operations in Lebanon once again, with Defense Minister Israel Katz saying Sunday morning post on X: "No score on any front will remain unsettled." He added: "We will forcefully defend our soldiers and citizens."
According to more from Israel's side of the narrative:
The Israeli military spokesperson, Ella Waweya, said Israel had attacked “Hezbollah infrastructure” in the Ansar and Nabatieh area in response to the group’s fighters attacking soldiers in the Ali Taher area.
...On Sunday, the Israel Defense Forces said it had killed a senior Hezbollah commander in an airstrike in the southern Lebanon town of Deir al-Zahrani the previous day. It said the Saturday morning strike on Ali Muhammad Fakhr al-Din came in response to a Hezbollah explosive drone attack in the predawn hours Saturday that seriously wounded three soldiers.
Lebanese media reported that the Deir al-Zahrani strike on Saturday morning killed two people.
Aftermath of Israeli attack on the southern Lebanese town of Deir al-Zahrani:
VIDEO | The scene of the Israeli attack on the southern Lebanese town of Deir al-Zahrani. https://t.co/Lf1qEb5IEK pic.twitter.com/duSLjW23d2
— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) August 15, 2026And additionally there was a rare Saturday statement (on the Jewish Sabbath) from Prime Minister Netanyahu's office: it said "Hezbollah violated the ceasefire in Lebanon by attacking our soldiers in the security zone, which protects Israeli communities just across the border."
"The IDF responded by striking the Hezbollah terror headquarters which ordered the attack," the PM's office said. "Only later did the IDF learn that Hezbollah deliberately put civilians in that military compound," the statement added.
Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 02:45Hayden Panettiere beamed in final Instagram post weeks before her death at 36
Hayden Panettiere beamed in final Instagram post weeks before her death at 36
Kelly Clarkson won’t let her kids watch ‘From Justin to Kelly’ after brutal admission about 2003 film
Kelly Clarkson won’t let her kids watch ‘From Justin to Kelly’ after brutal admission about 2003 film
English Villages In Fear Over 1,200 Male Migrants Moved Next To Schools
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,
England's most peaceful villages are once again being turned into the front line of the migrant crisis.
Up to 1,200 single adult male asylum seekers are earmarked for former military sites sitting within a mile of primary schools, nurseries and children's play areas, in direct tension with the Home Office's own recent guidance against housing near sensitive locations.
The plan, revived and pressed forward under the current government, would drop large numbers of young men into high-trust, low-density rural communities that could not be more culturally distant from the backgrounds of many arrivals. The effect is to create maximum demographic shock and local fury in places least equipped to absorb it.
Villagers up in arms as up to 1,200 male asylum seekers to be placed within a MILE of primary schoolhttps://t.co/PP4hXYWJyz
— GB News (@GBNEWS) August 15, 2026Villagers across North Yorkshire, Suffolk and Oxfordshire are now up in arms as the Home Office continues with three former military bases. RAF Linton-on-Ouse near York is set for as many as 1,200 male asylum seekers. The village itself has only around 600 residents. The result would be a ratio of six migrant men to every local woman. The site sits right in the heart of the community, adjacent to the primary school, a nursery and a children's play area.
North Yorkshire councillor Malcolm Taylor put it plainly: "It's quite an attractive site, it's not one of your austere former military sites and it's right in the heart of the village. So as a consequence, it's right adjacent to the school, the play park. That's what has really ramped up the concerns of the community."
This is the same Linton-on-Ouse that previously defeated similar plans in 2022. The numbers and the location have not become any more suitable. The base is isolated, with limited buses, strained water, sewage and electricity capacity, and no real village infrastructure to support a sudden influx of that scale.
Villages are up in arms as Labour pushes ahead with plans to dump up to 1,200 male asylum seekers on former military sites including within a mile of primary schools.
RAF Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire, RAF Barnham in Suffolk and a site near Piddington in Oxfordshire are in... pic.twitter.com/uZUe9TCW0i
In west Suffolk, RAF Barnham near Thetford faces proposals for up to 1,250 asylum seekers. Barnham School sits close enough that parents are already discussing withdrawing children, a move that could threaten the school's future. Parish council chairman John Bauer has highlighted the risk.
A third site near the tiny Oxfordshire village of Piddington, beside the former MoD depot at Bicester, sits next to a children's play area. That community of roughly 350-400 people has already staged a symbolic referendum in which 96 per cent voted to leave the UK rather than accept up to 1,250 single adult male asylum seekers.
Children wrote pleading letters. Residents described being driven into a corner with no consultation and no serious infrastructure assessment.
Quiet, traditional villages with minimal services and high social trust are repeatedly selected for the densest concentrations of single young men who arrived illegally. These are places where residents still walk at night without fear and where children play freely. They are precisely the environments most alien to the cultural norms of many of the men being housed there.
This picture a thousand words ?? pic.twitter.com/jzqOs3s5pg
— Hughstar (@HughCurry) August 14, 2026Prime Minister Andy Burnham has framed the policy as a matter of fairness. "We cannot have a situation where it's only the poorest communities in the country that receive all of the dispersal of refugees and asylum seekers. I do believe all parts of the country need to work, to play their part."
Borders minister Anna Turley has insisted the men "are not going to be in the village" and that "everything they need will be on that site." Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said no final decision has been taken and that factors including schools "are taken into account."
Yet the placements continue to target the same type of community. In the Welsh seaside village of Gronant, population around 1,600, 13 of 15 new-build homes on the site of a former village hall were allocated to asylum seekers without local warning.
Residents only discovered the plan after blacked-out minibuses arrived at night and bunk beds were delivered. One local called it "pure betrayal." Another said "nobody was told about the arrivals."
The same dynamic has played out elsewhere: sudden concentrations of single men near schools and play areas, limited local policing, inadequate utilities, and top-down decisions that bypass ordinary planning scrutiny.
For the Bicester and Barnham sites the government is using an urgent national-interest route that sends applications straight to the Housing Secretary, sidestepping local authorities.
Reform's Zia Yusuf captured the raw numbers: "Andy Burnham is about to dump 1200 unvetted adult male illegal migrants on a tiny village, resulting in locals putting up with a ratio of SIX MEN TO EVERY WOMAN... Burnham is directly endangering British women and girls."
The consistent choice of the most tranquil, most English villages for the largest groups of single male arrivals produces the maximum cultural collision. These communities did not ask for the crisis, did not vote for open borders, and possess none of the infrastructure or social capital to absorb such a rapid demographic change without friction.
Placing the men there guarantees uproar. It is difficult to see the repeated selection of these locations as accidental.
Local MPs across parties have called the sites inappropriate. Residents are organising. The Home Office continues to insist the moves reduce hotel costs and spread the burden more fairly. What it actually spreads is the sense that ordinary British villages exist primarily as overflow capacity for a system that still fails to stop the boats or remove those with no right to remain.
The villages are not the problem. The policy that treats their way of life as disposable is.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 02:00