Aggregator
Obama-Appointed Judge Orders Trump Admin To Restart Processing Asylum Claims
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,
The Trump administration must restart processing claims of asylum, a federal judge ruled on June 5.
Officials must also resume adjudicating requests for immigration benefits such as work permits from nationals of 39 countries from which President Donald Trump has restricted travel, Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr., based in Rhode Island, said.
This is the same judge AFL exposed for failing to recuse from the Trump spending freeze case - despite previously leading a nonprofit that received $128M in federal funding.
The Department of Homeland Security and its U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) division, which implemented the challenged policies, said they did not agree with the ruling.
“The Left has been running the same gambit with so-called ‘animus’ claims since 2017. It is sabotage dressed in legal clothing,” James Percival, the Department of Homeland Security’s general counsel, told The Epoch Times via email.
“It goes like this: (1) the admin is racist, (2) therefore a policy I don’t like is motivated by race, (3) therefore it is invalid. They have used it on virtually every Trump era Department of Homeland Security policy.”
“These policies were wrong, plain and simple, and caused … profound fear and uncertainty for so many of our friends, neighbors, and coworkers,” Milagro Sique, CEO of Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement.
“Having the judicial process work as intended—by upholding the rule of law—gives us some reassurance that all is not lost and allows those who have been impacted to move forward with their lives in a meaningful way.”
The administration in late 2025 announced the policies in the wake of the shooting, allegedly by an Afghan national, of National Guard members near the White House. USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said at the time that asylum claims would not be processed “until we can ensure that every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible.”
A coalition of groups, including the Service Employees International Union and the Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts, filed a lawsuit over the policies in March. They said that the policies violated federal law because they went beyond the authority of USCIS, were arbitrary and capricious, and went against U.S. Constitutional protections.
Government lawyers said the policies fell within the authority Congress outlined in the Immigration and Naturalization Act.
McConnell said Friday in a 135-page decision that the policies “threw the lives of countless immigrants living in the United States into indeterminate legal limbo” solely because of where the immigrants were born.
He wrote that USCIS violated federal laws, in part because officials made decisions without adequate explanation.
“The agency has violated the very immigration laws that Congress has charged it with administering, as well as the administrative laws that govern the agency’s actions,” he said. “In enacting its latest immigration policies, USCIS: claims statutory and regulatory authority that it does not possess; makes decisions without the reasoned explanations that it must provide; acts without regard for the reliance interests of applicants that it must consider; and justifies its actions with pretextual concerns of ‘national security’ that mask anti-immigrant sentiments that it is forbidden from letting influence its decision-making. In legal terms that means USCIS’s actions are contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious.”
The ruling vacated the policies as illegal and set them aside, as well as two other USCIS policies.
One involved reviewing and reconsidering past decisions granting immigration benefits to any people from countries subject to Trump’s travel ban. The other featured amendments to the USCIS policy manual, requiring agency workers to take a person’s home country as a negative factor when deciding whether to grant requests for benefits.
Tyler Durden Sat, 06/06/2026 - 19:50Eight people reportedly shot as gunfire erupts at family-friendly Ohio festival
Pope Leo backs team USA in the World Cup — as he could become third straight pope to watch homeland win
USC’s bullpen can’t hold it down during loss to North Carolina
Father’s Day is coming: 49+ best gift for men that are better than a joke tie
Identity of teen killed in horrific mass shooting at Bay Area high school graduation revealed
Manny Machado goes scorched earth on analytics during his brutal Padres season: ‘Too many stats out there’
The gamers taking on the industry to stop it switching off games
Yankees place Austin Wells on IL, call up J.C. Escarra one day after demotion in wild catching shuffle
Facebook Marketplace Enters The AI Thirst-Trap Era
Searching Facebook Marketplace in the AI era has revealed a strange new phenomenon: sellers are running product photos through chatbots or image generators to insert scantily clad women into listings.
This marketing ploy seemingly bets that thirst-trap imagery will boost clicks and improve the chances of selling whatever item is listed on the online marketplace.
"This dude on FB Marketplace has multiple listings for heavy Caterpillar industrial equipment superimposed with AI-generated female models. Must have industry-leading click-through rates," journalist Trung Phan wrote on X.
This dude on FB Marketplace has multiple listing for heavy Caterpillar industrial equipment superimposed with AI-generated female models. Must have industry-leading click through rates.
Absolutely crying rn. https://t.co/Mpx6QIdOtQ pic.twitter.com/EINbmxJO66
Sure enough, the thirst-trap imagery appears to be working...
Oh trung I tried the same thing with my gym machinery, and im flooded with interest today LOL pic.twitter.com/a9E47WwYBy
— Simon Biscuits ☻ (@seempaq) May 28, 2026Here's another example.
One Facebook Marketplace seller said the marketing ploy absolutely works.
The listings were dead until I updated the images LOL pic.twitter.com/GuhNFIthvU
— Simon Biscuits ☻ (@seempaq) May 28, 2026This is a real-world example of how sellers are using AI to try to boost low click-through rates.
Tyler Durden Sat, 06/06/2026 - 19:15Golden Tempo wins 2026 Belmont Stakes with another late comeback
Woman killed by FDNY truck that was rushing to emergency in Bronx
Inside the harrowing final moments of bank robber bomber who took 10 hostages during terrifying standoff
Manny Machado gives honest answer about Padres needing to find urgency
Trump mocks ‘Barack Hussein Obama Library’ with AI image of site overrun with trash and sprawling homeless encampments
Eric Dane’s daughter graduates middle school after actor’s ‘incredibly difficult’ ALS death
Eric Dane’s daughter graduates middle school after actor’s ‘incredibly difficult’ ALS death
How Knicks are bringing Victor Wembanyama, Spurs into ‘difficult areas’ early in NBA Finals
Viral: Humanoid Robot Kicks Chinese Kid In The Stomach During Public Demonstration
Authored by Jijo Malayil via Interesting Engineering,
A humanoid robot demonstration has sparked safety concerns after a video circulating on social media appeared to show a Unitree G1 robot accidentally kicking a young child during a public event.
The robot, which was performing a roundhouse kick while wearing a blue clown wig, struck the child in the stomach, causing the youngster to double over in pain.
The incident has reignited debate over the safe deployment of advanced humanoid robots in crowded public settings, particularly as increasingly capable machines are showcased at exhibitions and entertainment events.
Jerk clown robot brutally kicks little boy in the stomach
The future is here, and apparently it's beefing with children pic.twitter.com/x2tKaWm6iK
Last year, a viral experiment showed a humanoid robot overriding its safety restrictions and firing a BB gun at its owner during a role-play scenario.
Robot Safety SpotlightA video circulating on social media has raised concerns about humanoid robot safety after a robot appeared to kick a child during a public demonstration in China's Xinjiang region.
The footage shows what is believed to be a Unitree G1 humanoid robot, wearing a blue wig, performing a roundhouse kick that struck a young child standing nearby. The child was hit in the stomach and appeared to be in pain after the impact. According to reports from Chinese media, the child was not seriously injured.
The incident has renewed discussion about the risks associated with deploying advanced humanoid robots in public environments. Modern humanoid robots are capable of performing complex movements, including martial arts demonstrations, athletic maneuvers, and other dynamic actions, often under remote or autonomous control, reports Futurism.
The Xinjiang incident is not the first reported case involving a humanoid robot and a human injury. Earlier this year, another Unitree G1 robot reportedly lost its balance during a public performance in China. After falling to the ground, the robot's uncontrolled limb movements struck a nearby man, causing a nose injury.
A viral experiment last year in the US raised concerns about AI robot safety after a humanoid robot named Max fired a BB gun at its owner during a role-play scenario. Although the robot initially refused requests to shoot, it complied after the command was framed as acting out a character. The incident highlighted how simple prompt changes can potentially bypass AI safety restrictions.
AI Liability QuestionsAs robots and AI systems become more capable and autonomous, the issue of accountability remains one of the biggest challenges facing the industry. When a robot causes injury, property damage, or other harm, determining responsibility is often far from straightforward. Questions arise over whether liability should rest with the software developers who designed the AI, the manufacturer that built the hardware, the operator overseeing the system, or the end user interacting with it.
The debate has become increasingly relevant as automation expands across transportation, manufacturing, healthcare, and public spaces. Similar concerns have emerged in other technology sectors. Tesla has faced scrutiny over crashes involving its Autopilot driver-assistance system, prompting discussions about the balance between software performance and human supervision. Likewise, investigations into the Boeing 737 MAX accidents highlighted how flaws in automated systems can have far-reaching safety consequences, according to experts.
Governments and regulators are still working to establish legal frameworks that address these challenges. In the United States, liability generally falls on manufacturers or operators, depending on the circumstances. Meanwhile, European policymakers are developing AI-specific regulations aimed at clarifying responsibility and strengthening public trust in emerging technologies.
While some researchers have suggested granting advanced AI systems a form of legal status, most experts argue that accountability should remain with people and organizations. To address safety concerns, robotics companies are increasingly adopting transparency measures, insurance-backed deployments, and stricter safety standards.
Tyler Durden Sat, 06/06/2026 - 18:40