Aggregator
Virginia Supreme Court Blocks Democrats’ Voter-Approved Congressional Map As Midterms Approach
The Supreme Court of Virginia has denied a request from Democrats and state officials to lift a lower-court order blocking certification of the April 21 redistricting referendum, leaving a voter-approved congressional map that could flip four Republican U.S. House seats in legal limbo just months before the 2026 midterm elections.
Supreme Court of VirginiaOn Friday, the Supreme Court of Virginia denied an emergency request from Democratic Attorney General Jay Jones to allow the State Board of Elections to certify the results of the April 21 special referendum. The move keeps in place a Tazewell County Circuit Court ruling that halted any state action on the map, which Democrats designed to flip up to four Republican-held U.S. House seats and create a 10-1 Democratic advantage in Virginia’s 11-member delegation.
The move comes as the Supreme Court continues to review whether Democratic lawmakers followed proper constitutional procedures when they placed the mid-decade redistricting amendment on the ballot.
🚨 BREAKING: The Virginia Supreme Court has overturned the Democrat gerrymandering referendum, ruling that the process to put in on the ballot was unconstitutional.
Virginia will keep their 5 Republican districts. pic.twitter.com/MK4kFd6nBS
The decision does not represent a final ruling on the constitutionality of the effort. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 27 and is still weighing the core legal questions. As of May 8, 2026, no merits decision has been issued, and the new map remains blocked.
A Mid-Decade Power PlayThe saga began in late 2025 after Texas Republicans redrew their congressional map mid-decade to gain seats. Virginia Democrats, who gained full control of state government after the 2025 elections, responded with a constitutional amendment allowing the General Assembly to temporarily redraw congressional districts outside the normal 10-year cycle - specifically to “restore fairness” if other states gerrymandered.
The amendment passed the legislature in a special session and again in January 2026, was signed by Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger, and went to voters on April 21. A heavily gerrymandered replacement map - passed by Democrats in February - accompanied the amendment. It splits Prince William and Fairfax counties into multiple districts in ways critics called “baconmandered” and would make 10 of 11 districts Democratic-leaning based on past voting patterns.
//--> //--> //--> Will the Democratic Party control the House after the 2026 Midterm elections?Yes 77% · No 24%
View full market & trade on Polymarket
Voters approved the measure by a narrow 51.7% to 48.3% margin (roughly 1.604 million to 1.499 million votes) in a high-turnout special election that became the most expensive in Virginia history, with over $93 million spent.
Current Virginia House delegation: 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans.
Democrats spent north of $80 million on the Virginia referendum.
Almost half of it came from Hakeem Jeffries' personal 501(c)4, House Majority Forward.
Louise Lucas, Don Scott, and Abigail Spanberger exerted so much of their political capital to get it passed.
All to be…
Republicans immediately sued, arguing the Democratic-controlled legislature violated multiple constitutional requirements in advancing the amendment:
- Exceeding the scope of a special session originally called for budget matters.
- Failing to provide proper 90-day public notice or an adequate “intervening election” between the two required legislative passages.
- Using misleading ballot language.
The case landed in conservative Tazewell County Circuit Court before Judge Jack Hurley Jr. Hurley ruled against the measure multiple times, including blocking the referendum itself (overturned by the Supreme Court to allow the vote) and, on April 22 - one day after voters approved it - issuing an injunction preventing certification and implementation.
Supreme Court ProceedingsDuring April 27 oral arguments, justices pressed both sides on procedural technicalities: the definition of an “election,” the validity of the special session, and whether post-election voter approval cures earlier defects. Justice Wesley G. Russell Jr. appeared particularly engaged with questions about early voting and public notice requirements.
Democrats argued that voters had spoken and that strict procedural challenges should not override the popular will after the fact. Republicans countered that the legislature “rammed through” the process in violation of constitutional safeguards designed to protect the amendment process.
On April 28, the Supreme Court denied Jones’s request for a stay, allowing the Tazewell injunction to remain in effect while the court deliberates the full appeal. The State Board of Elections has stated it cannot certify results until the high court rules.
High Stakes for 2026 MidtermsIf the new map ultimately takes effect, it could deliver Democrats a net gain of four seats in the U.S. House - a significant development in a closely divided Congress during President Donald Trump’s term. Four Republican incumbents would face newly unfavorable districts.
If the Supreme Court ultimately strikes down the amendment or map on procedural grounds, Virginia would likely revert to its current lines (or the bipartisan commission’s map) for the November 3, 2026, elections. Primaries are scheduled for August 4, and candidates have already begun filing amid the uncertainty.
Crystal Ball 2026 House Ratings After Virginia Redistricting got struck down
🔴 Republicans: 211 (+3)
🔵 Democrats: 208 (-4)
🟡 Tossup: 16 (+1) pic.twitter.com/6VyKf9RP3I
The case is part of a broader national wave of mid-decade redistricting battles, with both parties accusing the other of aggressive gerrymandering.
Tyler Durden Fri, 05/08/2026 - 10:42Chinese electric cars are driving into California as officials hit the panic button
Kamala Harris goes off on Trump in word-salad rant
Early offensive explosion propels USC baseball to rout of Nevada
How To Stream ‘Tales From the Crypt’ Episodes on Shudder: Price, Free Trial, Seasons 2-7 Release Dates
Is ‘Jersey Shore Family Vacation’ Really Ending?
Top NBA draft prospect Darryn Peterson reveals creatine nightmare at Kansas: ‘Thought I was going to die’
PGA Tour changing social media rules in possible Bryson DeChambeau temptation
Virginia Supreme Court overrules Democratic gerrymander, declaring new House maps ‘null and void’
68-year-old woman’s arms and legs turn blue after taking very common drug
Massive Forest Fire Threatens Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, Radiation Closely Monitored
It was only last month that Ukraine marked the 40th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, but on Friday there is another major threat to the site, which Russia says it is closely monitoring, according to RIA.
A massive forest fire is sweeping through the Chernobyl exclusion zone on Friday after a drone crashed near the defunct nuclear plant a day earlier, Ukrainian officials have said.
Illustrative/AP: During a similar 2020 fire a radiation spike was detected at the Chernobyl exclusion zone.As firefighters battle to contain the blaze, local officials further say that for now radiation levels remained within "normal limits"; however, there's been cause for alarm given the massive column of white smoke rising over the whole exclusion zone area.
Ukrainian sources did not identify who sent to UAV, but only state that the fire started Thursday "as a result of a drone crash." The Zelensky government has in the recent past frequently accused Russia of putting Chernobyl and other high secure nuclear sites under threat with its constant drone and aerial bombardment waves over the country.
Ukraine's emergency service agency said rescue teams are busy seeking to halt the spread of the fire, but wind has been playing a big part. "Due to strong gusts of wind, the fire is rapidly spreading across the territory, covering new sections of the forest," the agency said.
"The situation is complicated by dry weather, strong winds and mine danger in certain areas of the territory, which significantly limits the possibility of extinguishing work," it added. Belarusian media has estimated the fire is already more than 1,100 hectares, or over 2,700 acres.
A 2020 wildfire in the same area which was the result of arson had resulted in a radiation spike 16 times above normal levels. At the time, The Guardian had reported:
The fire had caused radiation fears in Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, which is located about 60 miles south of the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Government specialists on Monday sent to monitor the situation reported that there was no rise in radiation levels in Kyiv or the city suburbs.
So this current crisis does have the real potential to unleash higher radiation levels. That prior wildfire disaster saw the fire burn for weeks before it was extinguished.
Several prominent Ukrainian social media accounts have blamed the new fires on Russian shelling, or have also said it was a Russian drone that caused it...
😠 In Chernihiv region, about 2,400 hectares of forest are burning due to Russian shelling.
Firefighters are trying to contain the blaze and protect nearby settlements, but access is limited as enemy UAVs continue operating overhead. pic.twitter.com/StqIHZ7mSC
As for more recent alarming incidents at the defunct Chernobyl site, in 2025 an explosive drone had hit the protective containment shell of the plant. However, emergency crews were able to make it to the impact site on the immense roof and make repairs. Both the Ukrainian and Russian sides pointed the finger at the other for that attack.
Given that Chernobyl is a name that has captured popular imagination for decades since the apocalyptic historic disaster left the vicinity basically a radiation death zone, it could present the perfect false flag opportunity for anyone wishing to prolong and escalate the war - and nuclear officials have been keenly aware of this possibility.
Tyler Durden Fri, 05/08/2026 - 10:20House close to where Kianna Galvin, 17, vanished 10 years ago excavated over ‘anamolies’ underground
How to watch ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars’ Season 11 for free: Release date, cast
How to watch ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars’ Season 11 for free: Release date, cast
American Consumers Have Never Been Less Confident Despite Inflation Fears Easing; UMich
With the "mini war" still ongoing (albeit with a 'ceasefire' in place), expectations were for a continued slide (already at record lows) in the American consumer's sentiment in preliminary UMich data for May released today.
And while the expectations were correct in direction, once again they underestimated just how bad things are as the headline UMich print fell from 49.8 to 48.2 (a new record low and below the 49.5 expectation).
Under the hood was more mixed with Current Conditions tumbling to 47.8 from 52.5 (new all-time low) while Expectations ticked up from 48.1 to 48.5 (better than expected).
Not a pretty picture with all three indices below 50.
Source: Bloomberg
The American Consumer has been less confident...
Overall, inflation expectations eased last month: Year-ahead inflation expectations softened a touch from 4.7% last month to 4.5% this month, and Long-run inflation expectations inched down from 3.5% in April to 3.4% in May.
The drop in inflation expectations is odd since all the underlying cohorts saw expectations rise?
The decline in headline sentiment was driven by a surge in concerns about high prices both for personal finances as well as buying conditions for major purchases.
Republicans are losing faith...
UMich Survey Director Joanna Hsu notes that real income expectations continued a decline that began in March.
About one-third of consumers spontaneously mentioned gasoline prices and about 30% mentioned tariffs.
Taken together, consumers continue to feel buffeted by cost pressures, led by soaring prices at the pump.
Middle East developments are unlikely to meaningfully boost sentiment until supply disruptions have been fully resolved and energy prices fall.
Tyler Durden Fri, 05/08/2026 - 10:10