Aggregator
‘Half Man’ Cast Guide: Who Stars In HBO’s New Limited Series?
Bombshell twist in LAUSD racism against students fight — as DOE weighs in
Eric Swalwell’s wife breaks cover at luxe Mexican resort town where billionaire Dem donor owns a villa
Popular Jersey Shore town to close boardwalk overnight this summer to curb unruly teen crowds
‘Summer House’ Season 10 reunion seating chart revealed
‘Summer House’ Season 10 reunion seating chart revealed
Trump admin launches civil rights probe into NYC DOE over allegations of radical antisemitic teachers
"Gone In 60 Seconds": Feds Uncover DC-Area International Car Theft Ring
Authored by Jill McLaughlin via The Epoch Times,
Federal authorities in the Washington area have uncovered an alleged international vehicle theft ring involving six people suspected of stealing cars and shipping them to Africa, where they are sold for top dollar.
Six people were charged on April 22 in connection with their roles in the alleged scheme.
A 15-count federal indictment was unsealed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, charging the defendants with conspiracy to steal at least 20 vehicles in the Washington metropolitan area and Pennsylvania.
The cars are transported over state lines and sold to buyers in the United States and the African nation of Ghana, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington.
The indictment follows a year-long investigation into an alleged auto-theft ring in the District of Columbia area that involved vehicles stolen using electronic devices that allowed thieves to reprogram cars to accept blank key fobs, prosecutors said.
“They don’t need keys, and they don’t need hot wiring—no smashed windows, no drama—just a sleek electronic device called an ‘Autel’ and under a minute the car’s brain is rewritten,” U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said during a press conference on April 22.
“The car is gone in 60 seconds.”
An Autel device can be used to erase a vehicle’s records and reprogram its keys. Law enforcement is continuing to investigate the case, Pirro said.
The auto theft ring could involve more than 100 vehicles in the District of Columbia and more than 30 vehicles in Prince George’s County, Maryland.
Police officers working on the case executed a search warrant on April 21 at an automobile storage facility in Decatur, Georgia, locating several of the missing vehicles, prosecutors said.
The suspects are Jacob Hernandez, 29, of Los Angeles; Dustin Wetzel, 23, of Woodbridge, Virginia; James Young, 23, of Hyattsville, Maryland; Khobe David, 24, of Upper Marlboro, Maryland; and Chance Clark, 25, of Waldorf, Maryland.
Another defendant remains at large and is considered a fugitive. Prosecutors did not release the name of that defendant, whose indictment remained sealed.
According to the indictment, the stolen vehicles—mostly newer Honda Civics and CRVs, and Acura TLXs and RDXs—were first taken to be “cooled off” in storage locations in southeast Washington. Theeves allegedly disguised the cars by swapping license plates and obscuring the vehicle identification numbers (VINs), according to prosecutors.
Before shipping the stolen cars, the conspirators allegedly disabled the GPS and Bluetooth systems to deter detection.
A car transporter in Maryland was loaded with several of the recovered vehicles from an alleged international auto-theft ring that federal authorities say was connected to six people in the Washington metropolitan area. U.S. DOJ
“This isn’t joyriding,” Pirro said. “These are high-end vehicles loaded on transport carriers headed to ports in Savannah [Georgia] and Baltimore, Maryland.”
The stolen cars were then loaded onto shipping containers labeled as furniture to avoid more scrutiny and sent to Africa, where they were able to get “top dollar,” Pirro said.
Tyler Durden Thu, 04/23/2026 - 15:20House Ethics quietly probed NC Dem Alma Adams, 79, for alleged ‘inappropriate relationship’ with female staffer
‘Wheel Of Fortune’ fan conducts ‘insane’ study to find out how many divorces occur after male contestants refer to wives on air
Amtrak drags Metro-North to court after MTA allegedly slows down millions of commuters during petty feud
NYC experiencing a ‘moderate’ drought — and it may shorten cherry blossom season
Which beers have the most vitamin B — a must for heart health, immunity and good mood
California billionaires tax could slash yearly revenue by $4.5 billion
Home Depot says ‘bye’ to a traditional customer service feature in favor of AI
Kansas City Chiefs coach arrested day before NFL draft
Beyond Cookies - How To Stop The Invisible Browser Fingerprint That Tracks You Everywhere
For years, the privacy advice was simple: clear your cookies, use incognito mode, or click "Reject All" on those annoying consent banners. That advice is now outdated.
A groundbreaking study published last year has delivered the first peer-reviewed proof that the $600 billion online advertising industry has moved on from cookies. The new tracking method is called browser fingerprinting, and it works even if you never log in, never accept cookies, and have legally opted out under privacy laws.
Researchers from Texas A&M University and Johns Hopkins University built a tool named FPTrace to measure exactly how this works in the wild. They simulated real user sessions, systematically altered browser fingerprints, and watched what happened to the ads being served and the bids advertisers placed in real time. The results were clear: when the fingerprint changed, the price advertisers were willing to pay to target that "user" changed with it. Tracking signals dropped. The system was actively using the fingerprint to follow people across sessions and sites.
And crucially, this happened even in tests where cookies were fully deleted and users were in "opt-out" mode under GDPR and CCPA rules. The law’s exit door for cookies does not cover fingerprinting.
How Browser Fingerprinting Works (No Permission Required)Every time your browser loads a page, it leaks dozens of tiny, seemingly harmless signals:
- Screen resolution and color depth
- Installed fonts
- GPU model and graphics capabilities
- Audio processing signatures
- Browser version, plugins, and language settings
- Time zone
- Canvas rendering differences (how it draws hidden shapes)
- Whether you run an ad blocker
- Even battery level in some cases
Alone, each detail is common. Combined, they create a unique "fingerprint" that can identify your device with startling precision. No cookies. No login. No pop-up asking for consent. Just loading the page is enough.
Studies have long shown how pervasive this is. Princeton’s Web Transparency Project and related research have repeatedly found fingerprinting scripts running on a significant share of popular websites.
Princeton researchers tested the top 10,000 websites.
Fingerprinting scripts on 88% of them.
The EFF tested browsers directly.
83% had a fingerprint unique enough to track with no cookies at all.
You do not have to visit a shady site.
You just have to open a browser.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s long-running Cover Your Tracks test (formerly Panopticlick) has demonstrated that a large majority of browsers produce fingerprints unique enough to track users without any cookies at all—historically around 83% or higher in large samples.
Why This Matters NowCookies are dying. Google has been phasing out third-party cookies in Chrome, and Apple has aggressively blocked them in Safari for years. Advertisers needed a replacement that users cannot easily clear, block, or reset. Browser fingerprinting is that replacement: it is invisible, persistent, and rebuilds itself if your setup changes slightly.
The result? Targeted ads that follow you across devices and sessions, even when you think you’ve gone "private." And because it operates below the surface of most privacy laws, the protections many people rely on simply don’t apply.
What Actually Works to Protect YourselfMost people get privacy wrong by making their setup more unique (rare browsers + 30 extensions = the most identifiable fingerprint on the internet). True anonymity comes from uniformity, not obscurity.
Here are the proven defenses, ranked by effectiveness:
1. Choose the right browser (the single biggest decision)
- Tor Browser – The gold standard. It forces every user to share the exact same fingerprint. Anonymity through uniformity.
- Brave – Excellent middle ground for everyday use. It randomizes canvas, WebGL, audio, and other fingerprintable surfaces every session.
- Firefox (with strict settings) – Strong out of the box and highly customizable. Avoid Chrome for privacy-sensitive activity; it offers no native fingerprint resistance.
2. Add the right extensions (Firefox or Brave only)
- uBlock Origin – Blocks fingerprinting scripts before they can run. (Note: Chrome’s Manifest V3 severely limited the full version; Firefox is required for maximum protection.)
- CanvasBlocker – Randomizes your canvas output whenever a site tries to read it.
3. Flip one powerful Firefox setting Type about:config in the address bar → search for privacy.resistFingerprinting → set it to true. This standardizes canvas, timezone, fonts, and other outputs so you blend in with everyone else. Takes 30 seconds and makes a measurable difference.
Bottom line: Clearing cookies no longer protects you. The advertising industry has quietly built a more resilient tracking system that operates in the shadows of your browser.
Tyler Durden Thu, 04/23/2026 - 15:00