Authored by AG News Staff via American Greatness,
A former U.S. Postal Service worker has been federally indicted after prosecutors say he discarded roughly 300 mail-in ballots meant for Utah voters ahead of the state's June primary election.
Damon Matai Seei, 34, of Payson, was indicted by a federal grand jury Sept. 16 on a charge of unlawful secretion, destruction and delay of mail. He was arrested Tuesday and appeared in federal court in Salt Lake City.
According to prosecutors, Seei was working as a letter carrier June 3 when he was responsible for delivering mail to at least 300 residents in Eagle Mountain. His deliveries included advertisements and hundreds of mail-in ballots for the June 23 primary.
Federal authorities allege Seei instead discarded mail, including the ballots, in a dumpster in a church parking lot. A Justice Department court filing says Seei later told investigators he threw away the mail to "lighten his workload."
Several voters subsequently complained that their ballots had not arrived. Authorities are investigating whether affected residents obtained replacement ballots or were ultimately able to vote.
Seei told investigators he had no political motive, according to officials.
"When American voters lawfully cast their vote, they should feel confident that it is counted," Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter said. "Allegedly throwing away hundreds of ballots is a serious federal crime that undermines the integrity of our elections."
The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General and Homeland Security Investigations jointly investigated the case. Seei's next court appearance is scheduled for Nov. 30.
Tyler Durden Wed, 09/23/2026 - 08:30Just the day after the White House reported its envoys had a "very productive" 3-hour long meeting with the Iranian side at the UN in New York, and as President Masoud Pezeshkian is readying to address the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, there's been another tanker attack incident in the Strait of Hormuz.
UKMTO cites in a fresh alert that a cargo vessel has reported being struck by an unknown projectile, resulting in two casualties.
Illustrative file image, Associated PressAll crew has been evacuated, with the vessel on fire and adrift, in what looked to be a major attack by either a drone or missile. Further, "UKMTO said authorities were investigating the incident and that there was no reported environmental impact."
Tehran remained defiant after Tuesday's ultimatum and threats from the UN stage by President Trump. He had posed before the world, provocatively:
"Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before — maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world? Or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic, and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy again?"
"Do I drive them into hell," he continued, "with no chance of survival and no hope of future greatness?"
Iranian Ambassador Kazem Jalali has responded by saying that Washington has no choice but to accept what he called the strait’s new legal status. He asserted this will only be decided under the protocol being implemented by Iran and Oman, and only then will US or other foreign ships pass through the waterway.
Further there was a written, albeit indirect, response from the Ayatollah, who is in hiding:
Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, though not in direct response to Trump, used similarly combative imagery in a message marking the start of Iran’s academic year, describing knowledge combined with faith and morality as a “sharp sword” capable of cutting off the hands of aggressors.
Iran’s military has also dismissed threat to "annihilate" the Islamic Republic, stating it is ready to hit back with "crushing" attacks far more severe than what marked earlier phases of the war.
The numbers have doubled in less than a month.
The total crude oil egress via the USN-BL is now 13 Mbpd, with estimated SoH transits at 10.35 Mbpd given that Fujairah and Mina al-Fahal together account for around 2.65 Mbpd on average.
This is partly attributed to Saudi Arabia… https://t.co/ZffcwAhQ4J
This week had kicked off with similar Hormuz incidents on Sept.20 and 21. The ADNOC Shipping & Logistics LPG carrier and tanker, as well as an Isle of Man-flagged tanker, were attacked by the Iranians in those incidents.
Tyler Durden Wed, 09/23/2026 - 08:15Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
The United Kingdom is about to discover the part of the Laffer Curve where the billionaire taxpayers simply get on a plane and go somewhere else.
His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs has now assigned a dedicated “compliance manager” to every billionaire it has identified with a UK tax footprint, dramatically expanding the government’s oversight of the country’s richest people, according to a new report from Bloomberg this week.
HMRC is using its own records, public information and data shared by foreign governments to identify billionaires with UK tax exposure and map their connections to businesses, trusts and other entities. “The UK tax authority has assigned a personal compliance manager to every billionaire within its reach as it seeks to get a better grip on the super-rich’s tax liabilities,” the report says.
HMRC says the goal is straightforward, making sure wealthy taxpayers pay what they legally owe, and the government confirmed this month that every billionaire with a UK tax footprint was allocated a Customer Compliance Manager over the summer.
But consider the message Britain is sending: become extraordinarily successful, build companies, accumulate enough capital and pay enough taxes, and eventually the government assigns an individual bureaucrat to keep tabs on you.
At some point, you have to wonder whether the people designing these policies understand that billionaires are among the most geographically mobile people on Earth. They literally are the most mobile people on the planet. They don’t have to stay.
And they won’t. They can live in Dubai. They can establish themselves in Monaco. They can move to Malta or Switzerland or any number of jurisdictions competing aggressively for wealthy residents, investors and entrepreneurs. Their businesses, capital and families are often international already. Moving is inconvenient, but for someone worth several billion dollars it is hardly an insurmountable obstacle.
In my mind this is what British billionaires do in Monte CarloAnd Britain isn’t exactly starting from zero here. The country abolished its longstanding non-dom tax regime in April 2025, and several prominent billionaires, including hedge-fund manager Chris Rokos, steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal and businessman Nassef Sawiris, have subsequently left the UK. Billionaire Betfred founder Fred Done, whose family reportedly paid roughly £400 million in taxes last year, recently warned that Britain’s increasingly hostile tax environment is pushing wealthy people and businesses elsewhere.
Now imagine you’re another billionaire watching this unfold. You’ve watched other wealthy residents leave. And now you’re informed that the tax authority has effectively assigned someone specifically to understand your finances, behavior, tax returns and potential compliance risks.
HMRC describes these managers in considerably friendlier language, but its own explanation is revealing. Customer Compliance Managers are tasked with developing an “in-depth understanding” of wealthy taxpayers’ finances and behavior, reviewing their returns alongside intelligence gathered both inside and outside Britain, and challenging taxpayers where HMRC believes the correct amount isn’t being paid.
🔥 85% OFF FOREVER IF YOU SUBSCRIBE TODAY: I am again offering an 85% discount to anyone that wants to become a Fringe Finance annual subscriber today. It’s a discount you can keep and stays applied for as long as you wish to remain a subscriber: Get 85% off forever
Of course billionaires should pay every pound of tax they legally owe. Tax fraud should be prosecuted whether the person committing it has £10,000 or £10 billion.
But there is a meaningful difference between enforcing the tax code and designing an enforcement apparatus around a specific class of people simply because they possess extraordinary wealth. HMRC says the allocation reflects wealth, complexity and risk, and supporters will reasonably argue that complicated international fortunes require more specialized oversight.
My concern is what happens when that philosophy becomes cumulative. Higher taxes. The destruction of preferential regimes intended to attract international wealth. Ever-more aggressive information gathering. There is a point where taxation starts feeling less like collecting revenue and more like abusing success. In the U.S. New York City is turning into a prime example of this.
But unlike ordinary taxpayers, the people being targeted have an escape hatch.
Watch what happens next. I suspect Britain is going to discover that there is a practical limit to how much scrutiny and taxation governments can pile onto extremely mobile capital before that capital simply leaves. Dubai, Monaco, Malta and other wealth-friendly jurisdictions don’t need to persuade every billionaire in Britain to relocate. They only need to make the alternative sufficiently attractive. And it is.
The irony is that driving away even a relatively small number of enormously wealthy taxpayers can undermine the entire exercise.
Britain’s wealthy population generated an estimated £95 billion in PAYE and National Insurance receipts and another £65 billion in other taxes in 2025-26, although those figures cover HMRC’s much broader definition of “wealthy” rather than billionaires specifically.
Governments have a habit of treating wealthy taxpayers like permanent entries on a spreadsheet: raise the tax liability, multiply it by the same number of taxpayers, and assume the resulting revenue simply appears.
But people don’t stay frozen in spreadsheet cells forever. When the cost of remaining in a jurisdiction rises enough, behavior changes. People restructure their finances, move assets, alter investment decisions or, particularly at the very top of the wealth distribution, simply leave.
It’s about as basic a concept as you can get when discussing taxation: changing the tax rate can also change the tax base. Yet fiscal projections can make it look as though the people being taxed will sit still indefinitely while their liabilities keep rising.
As New York City's Mamdani has just learned the hard way, billionaires, in particular, have an unusual ability to respond to those incentives…sometimes from a private jet. Britain may soon find this out.
Now read:
--
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here.
Tyler Durden Wed, 09/23/2026 - 08:05