Aggregator
Hong Kong — sanctions-buster, grade inflation tricks parents and other commentary
Cowboy hat wearing Rep. Frederica Wilson, 83, will retire from Congress
Trump’s top Wall Street cop shoots down Biden-era climate rules for US firms
Dilapidated FDNY firehouses plagued by huge leaks, collapsed ceilings, mold and more
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Arco’ on Hulu, a Sweetly Optimistic Animated Film Set During Bleak Times
How much are the cheapest tickets to see Bruno Mars on his ‘Romantic Tour’?
Charlie Kirk throws football with Jimmy Garoppolo in resurfaced clip
Former Iowa school district leader who falsely claimed US citizenship sentenced to 2 years in prison, likely faces deportation
Trump Accounts do’s and don’ts — advice from financial advisers on how to make the $1K fund best work for your child
Caitlin Clark skipped media after rough game in Fever loss — despite setting WNBA record
Karen Bass plans ‘massive’ FIFA World Cup watch parties in MacArthur Park
One In Three American Men No Longer Working
The number of American men participating in the workforce has fallen to one of its lowest levels in nearly two decades, according to new federal labor statistics.
Just 66 percent of men age 20 and older were employed or actively seeking work as of April, according to data released earlier this month by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. That figure has dropped sharply from 73 percent in 2006 and now sits near levels last seen during the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis.
The numbers mean roughly one in three American men are no longer in the workforce.
The only modern period with lower participation rates came during the economic devastation caused by the 2020 pandemic, when male workforce participation collapsed to 59 percent.
While employment rates gradually recovered during the years following the Great Recession, those gains were wiped out during the pandemic downturn. Participation rebounded somewhat within two years before beginning another steady decline that has continued into 2026.
The downward trend appears ongoing. Male workforce participation fell another full percentage point in April compared with the same period in 2025, according to Labor Department data.
Several economic shifts are contributing to the decline.
Industries that have traditionally employed large numbers of men including transportation, manufacturing and other labor-intensive sectors, have shed jobs over the past year, according to the Washington Post.
At the same time, growing numbers of retirees and male students have reduced the share of men participating in the labor market.
The labor picture for women has followed a different trajectory.
Female workforce participation also declined during the past two decades, though the swings have been less dramatic. Women saw only a 2-point decline during the 2008 recession, compared with a 5-point drop for men.
Women’s labor force participation has also remained more stable since the pandemic recovery, never falling below 56 percent since 2022.
The economy increasingly appears to favor sectors dominated by female workers. Healthcare and education jobs have grown over the past year, helping women capture nearly all recent job gains.
Of the 369,000 jobs added to the US economy since 2025, 96 perent went to women while just 4 percent went to men, according to the Washington Post.
Despite the shrinking share of men participating in the labor force, male unemployment has remained relatively low, hovering between 3 percent and 4 percent since 2021.
Tyler Durden Fri, 05/29/2026 - 16:20Lakers’ Luka Doncic invests in Italian team, hopes to fulfill dream
California teens desperate for summer work hit a wall as unemployment doubles national average
Trump Refiles Lawsuit Over Wall Street Journal Article Linking Him To Epstein Letter
Authored by Jackson Richman via The Epoch Times,
President Donald Trump has refiled his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against Dow Jones & Company, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, over an article that alleged he signed a birthday letter sent to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump’s legal team submitted the revised complaint exactly on the May 27 deadline set by U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles. In April, Gayles dismissed the original lawsuit, ruling that Trump had failed to show that The Wall Street Journal acted with “actual malice,” the legal standard required in defamation cases involving public figures.
The updated complaint, which is seven pages longer than the original filing, again argues that Trump suffered significant financial and reputational damage from what his attorneys describe as a “false, defamatory, and malicious” article.
Trump has repeatedly denied authoring the 2003 letter.
In the new filing, Trump’s attorneys argue that only two surviving individuals could confirm whether the letter existed. According to the complaint, Trump “vehemently denied” writing it, while Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly told federal officials she had no knowledge of the document.
The complaint further accuses reporters Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo, along with Dow Jones and News Corp., of either knowingly publishing false information or intentionally avoiding evidence that contradicted the story.
The original Wall Street Journal report said that Trump denied both writing the letter and drawing the image.
However, Trump’s legal team states “the Defendants falsely, maliciously, and defamatorily state as fact that regardless of how the alleged letter was prepared, it nonetheless contains President Trump’s authentic signature.”
Responding to requests for comment, publisher Dow Jones declined to discuss the refiled lawsuit but reiterated a previous statement issued in July 2025.
“We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit,” a company spokesperson said.
In dismissing the original case, Gayles explained that proving actual malice requires evidence that a publisher knowingly reported false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. He wrote that Trump’s earlier complaint “comes nowhere close to this standard.”
Gayles also noted that The Wall Street Journal sought comment from Trump, the Justice Department, and the FBI before publication. Trump denied writing the letter, the Justice Department did not respond, and the FBI declined to comment.
The judge further stated that claims the newspaper ignored contradictory evidence were weakened by the article itself, which included Trump’s denial. Allegations of ill intent alone, he wrote, were insufficient to establish actual malice without supporting factual evidence.
Attorneys representing the newspaper have argued that the article’s claims are true and therefore not defamatory. However, Gayles declined to decide those factual disputes at this stage of the proceedings. He said questions regarding whether Trump authored the letter or maintained a personal relationship with Epstein remain unresolved.
To proceed with the lawsuit, Gayles wrote, Trump must provide clear evidence that The Wall Street Journal knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
The judge characterized the original complaint as relying on “formulaic” accusations that failed to meet the high legal threshold required for public figures pursuing defamation claims.
Following the dismissal, Trump addressed the case on Truth Social, saying his legal team would submit a revised complaint before the court’s deadline.
“It is not a termination, it is a suggested re-filing,” Trump wrote.
Trump originally filed the lawsuit in July 2025 after The Wall Street Journal published an article about the sexually suggestive letter allegedly bearing his signature in a birthday album created for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003.
Tyler Durden Fri, 05/29/2026 - 15:40