Aggregator
NY Rep. Mike Lawler reaps nearly $5M as he faces tough Dem challenger in toss-up House race
Offload Risks Onto The Bottom 90% And Immiseration Follows
Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,
The underlying story of the past 50 years has been the offloading of risk onto workers and consumers.
On my map of how the world works, we start with structures of control that distribute the good stuff--resources, assets, income and power--and the bad stuff: costs, losses and risks. As I explained in The US Economy In a Nutshell: Privatize the Gains, Socialize the Costs, the current arrangement distributes the gains to the top 10% and the costs and risks to the bottom 90% via privatizing the gains and socializing--i.e. dumping them onto the biosphere and the public--the costs and losses.
This follows a power-law distribution: the few at the top reap most of the gains, and the leftovers, scraps and crumbs are distributed in descending order, with most of what's left going to the top 9.5% and a diminishing dribble is scattered over the lower 90%, so that by the time we get to the bottom half of households, 170 million people own a grand total of 2.5% of the nation's financial assets, while the top 0.1% own 16.6%--6.6X the bottom 50%.
A key mechanism in this wildly asymmetric distribution of gains and costs is the system favors capital over wages. As the charts below illustrate, the financial gains go to the owners of capital, and since ownership of capital is highly concentrated, these few owners siphon up the vast majority of the gains.
One way to understand how the current arrangement favors capital over wages is to reverse the tax liabilities of capital and wages. Employers and employees pay 15.3% of every dollar of wages in Social Security / Medicare taxes, plus income taxes that quickly rise to 22%, for a total tax rate of 37.3% on wages. (Note self-employed people like myself pay the full 15.3% ourselves, as we're both employer and employee.)
Capital gains are taxed at 20%, but only when the asset is sold, so the wealthy borrow against their unrealized gains and live off this borrowed money to avoid selling and having to pay tax on capital gains. And since the system depends on debt to survive, the interest on debt is deductible, giving the wealthy borrowers a tax deduction for avoiding capital gains.
Now imagine all capital gains, realized or unrealized, were taxed at 37% and the first $80,000 of wages were tax-free. The median wage is around $80,000, hence my picking that number. As for the hue and cry about unrealized capital gains being taxed, that's easily addressed: unrealized gains in primary-residence owner-occupied homes and retirement accounts would be exempted. Every other gain made playing in the casino would be taxed.
Reversing the asymmetry of tax liabilities would dramatically alter the distribution of gains and costs. Wages have lost ground for 50+ years, and the favoring of capital is a key driver of this decline in the share of the economy that's distributed to wage earners.
Half the nation's households--170 million people own a grand total of 2.5% of the nation's financial assets:
The winner-take-most arrangement favoring capital:
Another key driver is the offloading of risk from owners to consumers and workers, a perverse process that has been obscured by incremental degradation. Risk is a strange phenomenon that defies easy definition. Risk isn't a direct loss or cost; it's the probability of losses and costs arising in what appears on the surface to be a stable arrangement.
Consider the stunning decline in the quality of durable goods such as appliances, and global industry adopting a laughably valueless one-year warranty across the board. Appliances that routinely lasted 30 years before "Progress" took the reins now routinely fail in 3+ years.
In the good old days before "Progress" took the reins, manufacturers absorbed the risk of premature failure of the goods they produced. Now this risk has been offloaded onto consumers, who are now forced to buy "extended warranties" as the only means of mitigating the risk they now carry of premature failure.
This is in effect a form of extortion: "nice refrigerator you got there, too bad it's at risk of breaking." Well, if current manufacturers had the same standards as previous generations, we wouldn't need "extended warranties." Welcome to the Mafia Economy: low quality goods and services force "upgrades," i.e. extortion.
Consider the offloading of risk onto workers. Employment other than casual labor once included healthcare insurance and other basic benefits. In the "gig economy" of contract employment and gigs, the worker is now responsible for paying their Social Security / Medicare taxes, healthcare insurance and retirement contributions.
The decline of hourly wages is another offloading of risk onto the worker. The percentage of workers paid by the hour has declined in favor of salaried positions with open-ended demands on workers: where hourly workers get paid for hours on the job, salaried workers are now on the hook for work beyond a conventional 8-hour work shift.
Then there's the immense mass of risk and labor that's been offloaded onto consumers and workers as shadow work, often the result of having to fix failures in goods and services that were once the responsibility of the provider or employer and have been dumped on consumers and workers. This is a topic I've often addressed.
This Is Why You're Drowning in Busywork: We have been told that A.I. will take people's jobs. What no one mentions is that many of those jobs are landing on us. The A.I. revolution involves a huge transfer of labor-- not from worker to machine but from worker to consumer. (nytimes.com, paywalled)
Another source of risk is the dependence on debt to fund the lifestyles we deserve: as the purchasing power of wages has declined, the easy "solution" is to fill the gap between what earnings can buy and what we want / need / expect / deserve with borrowed money.
As we all know, debt comes with risk, as falling behind greases the slide to default, bankruptcy and ruin. 27% interest rates on credit cards steepen the slide into a cliff: one missed payment can trigger a cascade of events that cannot be reversed. This is why I often observe that fewer bad things can happen if you have no debt.
Last but far from least, is the current arrangement's dependence on serial credit-asset bubbles as the sole driver of "growth", a dependence that has led to a casino economy in which wage earners lose ground and in desperation turn to gambling as their last-ditch hope of gaining ground.
But despite 24/7 assurances that "this isn't a bubble," all bubbles pop with devastating consequences for those who believed the assurances of those operating the casino.
The underlying story of the past 50 years has been the offloading of risk onto workers and consumers, with the inevitable consequences being higher costs and losses leading to impoverishment and immiseration. We're frogs in water that's getting measurably hotter, and it's getting harder to muster the means to jump out of the simmering pot.
* * *
My book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition). Introduction (free). Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com. Subscribe to my Substack for free
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 16:20Gavin Newsom’s tax scheme could kill Hollywood jobs, lawmakers warn
Truly wicked claims after West Hollywood lowered US flags following Lindsey Graham’s death
Meta accused of using AI to target workers on medical leave in bloodbath layoffs: lawsuit
Rick Caruso backs California voter ID push opposed by Gavin Newsom allies
Why sportsbooks still see the Yankees as American League betting favorites
Police finish investigation against Jets’ Geno Smith after woman’s troubling social media post
Moronic mistake by San Francisco rideshare passenger carrying $26K brick of meth
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Hot Ones: Extra Heat’ On Netflix, Where The Hot Wing-Eating Interview Series Leaves The Studio, But Is Basically The Same Show
Tech Life
Venezuela's Oil Revival Faces A Critical Services Bottleneck
Authored by Rystad Energy via OilPrice.com,
-
Venezuela could increase crude production by about 194,000 bpd by late 2028, with most growth coming from existing producing fields rather than new discoveries.
-
International oil companies led by Chevron are expected to deliver nearly two-thirds of the forecast production increase through brownfield investments.
-
The biggest obstacles are operational, including drilling rigs, diluent supplies, infrastructure upgrades, and a competitive fiscal regime capable of attracting long-term investment.
Venezuela's upstream industry has entered a new phase. Following sweeping hydrocarbon reforms and broader geopolitical developments in early 2026, the conversation has shifted from whether the country can reopen its oil sector to whether it can successfully execute a meaningful production recovery. The country's resource potential has never been in doubt. The greater challenge now lies in converting policy momentum into sustained operational growth.
Rystad Energy estimates Venezuela's crude production could increase by approximately 17%, or around 194,000 barrels per day (bpd), between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the fourth quarter of 2028. Importantly, this growth is expected to come primarily from existing producing assets rather than large-scale new discoveries, highlighting that operational execution, not resource availability, will determine the pace of recovery.
Near-term production growth will be dominated by heavier crude grades. Around three-quarters of Venezuela's output through 2028 is expected to come from heavy, extra-heavy crude and bitumen, with the Orinoco Oil Belt accounting for roughly 60% of total production. This makes access to diluents, workover activity, infill drilling, and mature field management considerably more important than reserve additions over the next several years.
Venezuela upstream figure 1
International operators are driving the recoveryInternational oil companies (IOCs) are expected to contribute nearly two-thirds of Venezuela's forecast production increase through 2028. Chevron remains the largest contributor, followed by Repsol, Eni, Maha Energy and Maurel & Prom. Most of this growth is expected to come from expanding production at existing joint ventures, reflecting renewed investment following regulatory changes and sanctions relief rather than greenfield developments.
Chevron continues to occupy a particularly strategic position. Recent portfolio adjustments have strengthened its exposure to the Orinoco Oil Belt, while future production growth is expected to rely on brownfield optimization, infill drilling and the phased development of Ayacucho 8. Beyond Chevron, companies such as Eni and Repsol continue to play a dual role in both Venezuela's crude and natural gas sectors through assets including the Cardón IV block and the giant Perla gas field.
However, international participation remains highly selective. Companies continue to balance the opportunity presented by Venezuela's vast resource base against fiscal uncertainty, operational complexity and long-term investment risk.
Execution, not geology, remains the key constraintWhile policy reforms have improved the investment outlook, they do not eliminate the operational bottlenecks that have constrained production for years.
Sustained production growth will require continuous access to diluents, higher drilling activity, extensive workover campaigns, improved infrastructure and significantly greater rig availability. These operational requirements represent the critical link between resource potential and realized production.
Fiscal competitiveness also remains an important consideration. International operators have indicated that future capital commitments will depend on further improvements to Venezuela's fiscal framework, particularly around royalty rates and taxation. Lower project breakeven costs through more competitive fiscal terms could materially improve investment economics and encourage broader participation across the sector.
Oilfield services could become the industry's defining bottleneckPerhaps the greatest challenge facing Venezuela's recovery lies beyond the upstream operators themselves. The Venezuelan Oil Ministry has identified a requirement for 93 active drilling rigs by 2028, a significant increase from current activity levels. Achieving this target would require a phased expansion involving reactivating domestic rigs, refurbishing idle equipment, and eventually importing additional rigs from international markets.
This creates substantial opportunities for drilling contractors and oilfield service providers but also highlights the scale of the execution challenge. Companies must balance equipment mobilization costs, contract duration requirements, and country risk before committing capital.
Local contractors have begun reactivating existing fleets, while international service providers remain more cautious, waiting for greater evidence that recent policy reforms will translate into a stable, commercially attractive operating environment. As a result, rebuilding operational capacity may ultimately prove just as important as attracting upstream investment.
Venezuela upstream figure 2
The next phase depends on implementationThe 2026 Hydrocarbons Law represents one of the most significant structural reforms to Venezuela's upstream sector in decades. By expanding opportunities for private participation and introducing greater fiscal flexibility, the legislation has created a more attractive framework for future investment.
Yet legislation alone cannot restore production. The speed of implementation, the stability of fiscal policy, continued sanctions relief, and the industry's ability to rebuild operational capacity will ultimately determine whether Venezuela can translate ambition into sustained output growth.
For investors and operators alike, the opportunity is considerable. But the country's upstream revival will depend less on the size of its resource base than on its ability to consistently execute across drilling, infrastructure, services, and investment policy. That execution gap, not geology, is likely to define Venezuela's production trajectory over the remainder of the decade.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 15:45Lucid Calls Bankruptcy Report "Completely False" As Shares Stage V-Shaped Recovery
Summary:
- Lucid Exec Calls Bankruptcy Report 'Fake News'
- Lucid Reponds, Denies AlixPartners Has Recommended Bankruptcy Route
- Lucid Crashes On Report It's Weighing A Take-Private Or Bankruptcy
Nick Twork, Lucid's chief communications officer, took to X in late-afternoon trading to deny Electric-Vehicles.com's report about a potential bankruptcy, stating that the "company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special board committee to explore the scenarios reported today."
Twork stated:
The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is on improving execution, strengthening operations, and positioning Lucid to realize the full potential of its technology, products, and innovation. AlixPartners is assisting us in that and nothing else and has not recommended bankruptcy to management or the Board. We
$LCID The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is…
— Nick Twork (@ntwork) July 14, 2026Shares crashed nearly 50% at one point today and, in the final hour of trading, staged a V-shaped recovery.
Bloomberg data show Lucid is heavily shorted, with 37.22% short, or about 63.6 million shares.
One can only assume that short sellers used the crash to cover some of their bearish positions.
Lucid Denies ReportLucid responded to Electric-Vehicles.com's report, stating that restructuring adviser AlixPartners has not recommended bankruptcy.
Bloomberg headline:
- LUCID SAYS ALIXPARTNERS HAS NOT RECOMMENDED BANKRUPTCY
Electric-Vehicles.com's report did mention that another strategic option would be a take-private transaction.
Here are Lucid's top shareholders:
Lucid Crashes On Report It's Weighing A Take-Private Or BankruptcyShares of struggling EV maker Lucid plunged as much as 49% after auto-industry news website Electric-Vehicles.com reported that the company is working with restructuring adviser AlixPartners to evaluate strategic options, including a potential take-private transaction or a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.
Lucid (LCID) considering going private or chapter 11, according to https://t.co/lDDwzdDPdL
LUCID DOWN 45%
Lucid EV
Here's more from the report:
According to the sources who spoke on condition of anonymity because the review is strictly confidential, AlixPartners is urging the board to run one more round of restructuring in the United States and Europe, and to narrow the company's focus onto its Gravity SUV.
. . .
One person close to the matter told EV that the two starker questions, whether Lucid should be taken private or seek Chapter 11 protection, are among the scenarios the adviser has been asked to weigh.
Neither, the person stressed, is a decision the board has taken.
Shares were halved in late-afternoon trading in New York... Multiple trading halts were seen.
How long until Lucid denies the report?
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 15:41Natalie Imbruglia reveals ‘brutal’ life-changing diagnoses: ‘Felt like someone had taken some of my personality’
Natalie Imbruglia reveals ‘brutal’ life-changing diagnoses: ‘Felt like someone had taken some of my personality’
Big Blew It! IBM Crashes Most Since '60s Amid CapEx Woes; Goldman Warns Over 'Software Bear Case'
Summary:
- Wall Street Desks Stunned
- IBM Shares Crash Most On Record, Exceeding Dot Com & 1987 Crashes
- CEO Arvind Krishna Blamed Preliminary 2Q Results on "Shifting" Customer CapEx Spending
IBM's surprise second-quarter warning blindsided traders Tuesday morning, raising new concerns that enterprise technology budgets are being redirected toward AI infrastructure at the expense of traditional software and IT services.
Shares plunged 24% in the first 20 minutes of New York trading. Should those losses hold through the close, IBM would suffer its largest one-day crash on record, based on Bloomberg trading data going back to 1968.
Here's what Wall Street's top desks are saying in first takes:
UBS analyst Robert Ruple:
The big news this morning was a surprising negative preannouncement by IBM, down 22%, with Q2 sales of $17.2 bn versus $17.8 bn expected and EPS of $2.93 versus $3.02. Citing unanticipated capex reprioritization impacting client buying patterns with numerous large deals failing to close on time, cybersecurity distractions and some supply chain-related impact where they saw clients shift their quarterly capex spend toward servers, storage, and memory purchases to secure supply-constrained infrastructure (thanks to AI boom) ahead of expected price increases. This redirection of budgets towards AI has been a topic that Karl Keirstead/team have been articulating as potential risk for some time (particularly for incumbent SaaS suppliers and IT Services companies), which sounds like a harbinger of commentary that could be further accentuated by other software, IT services and hardware-related companies as Q2 reporting season progresses that is sure to weigh on sentiment incrementally.
David Vogt provides his initial thoughts on the IBM miss and these results suggest that enterprise IT spending pressures are hitting sooner than investors anticipated, leading to a revenue shortfall and non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.93, below both expectations and consensus. The primary driver was weakness in IBM's zSeries mainframe cycle, which hurt its high-margin Transaction Processing (TP) business. While Red Hat delivered solid 11% constant-currency growth and recently acquired assets such as HashiCorp and Confluent performed well, these positives were overshadowed by a sharp decline in TP revenue, which appears to have fallen in the mid-teens year over year and represents nearly 30% of IBM's Software segment. As a result, investors are likely to reassess IBM's long-term software growth outlook, particularly for 2027 and beyond, as rising infrastructure costs and tightening IT budgets weigh on demand. These results reinforce concerns that stronger growth areas like Red Hat may not be sufficient to offset prolonged weakness in TP business, increasing pressure on IBM to pursue larger acquisitions or other growth initiatives to sustain its software growth trajectory remaining at neutral.
Goldman analysts:
IBM: Negatively preannounced Q2 results this morning, with Revenues coming in well below estimates on shortfall led by Software & Infrastructure performance. Stock -17% in pre. Prelim Q2 Revenue missed estimates ($17.2bn vs. cons $17.9bn). Company said "did not anticipate magnitude of CapEx reprioritization." Shortfall vs. consensus was led by "Software and Infrastructure performance shortfall." Mgmt commentary: "What played out was worse than our expectations, driven by a shortfall in our Z performance and the associated software stack, primarily in Transaction Processing. In the last few weeks of June, we saw clients shift their quarterly capex spend toward servers, storage, and memory purchases to secure supply-constrained infrastructure ahead of expected price increases. This dynamic impacted client buying patterns. While we anticipated some supply chain related impact in our expectations, we did not anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization." BOTTOM LINE: This should fully play into the Software bear case, and would imagine should drive fairly broad-based weakness across software + services layer today (most names down 3%+ early in pre).
Goldman analyst James Schneider:
What happened: We expect the stock to trade meaningfully lower following IBM's negative pre-announcement this morning, which was driven by a shortfall in Infrastructure and Software to a lesser extent. We believe the mainframe shortfall reflects client demand re-prioritization toward near-term server and other hardware purchases given surging memory and component prices, a dynamic consistent with what peers such as Dell and HP have cited. This reprioritization also drove a shortfall in Transaction Processing because of perpetual licenses tied to new mainframe purchases. In addition, we believe the company's Data & Automation software segment saw weaker demand due to company-specific execution issues. Red Hat results were in line with expectations at a growth of 11% in the quarter. We leave our estimates unchanged for now, pending further color from the company on next week's earnings call on updated 2026 guidance and potential remediation efforts.
BNP Paribas analyst Stefan Slowinski:
IBM is trading -22% pre-market on a disappointing Q2 earnings pre-announcement, driven by the company's Infrastructure (hardware) and Software businesses, blamed on capex reprioritization (i.e. crowding out) and delays caused by cybersecurity uncertainty, with no indication of any improvements yet.
Barclays analyst Andrew Keches:
The news: IBM pre-released selected 2Q26 results alongside a letter to shareholders, with revenue below expectations amid shortfalls in Software and Infrastructure. Revenue came in at $17.2bn overall (vs. $17.9bn est.), while at the segment level, Software grew 5% y/y (vs. +11% est.), Infrastructure fell 7% (vs. -3% y/y est.), and Consulting was flat (vs. +2% y/y est.). The company attributed most of the underperformance to unexpected shifts in clients' late-quarter budget allocations toward securing supply-constrained infrastructure ahead of price increases. IBM also acknowledged an execution component, with numerous large deals failing to close on schedule.
The context: Today's update comes at a sensitive point for IBM's investment narrative. Software has become the company's primary growth engine, and management had increasingly framed AI as additive to the software stack rather than a source of disruption. Today's update complicates that framing as the shortfall was concentrated in Z and the associated Transaction Processing software stack, with clients redirecting spending toward supply-constrained servers, storage, and memory. The key debate, in our view, will be whether this represents a temporary shift in the timing of enterprise purchases, or evidence that rapid AI infrastructure investment is beginning to crowd out portions of traditional software spending.
Our take: Clearly the results are a disappointment and the equity move alone (-20% premkt as of writing) will be a drag on credit performance. Credit metrics would not be impacted in a meaningful way, but the development adds to already weak sentiment in the name. We are mindful of the pointed M&A comments made on the last call (valuations attractive, appetite could be higher than in normal years), and although this pre-release suggests nothing about the topic, weak results will add to the overhang. Moreover, IBM spreads have held in better than most A/BBB TMT curves in the recent TMT sell off, widening the differential to BBB telco and single-A software curves such as NOW. To be clear, we view this quarter as a one-off rather than a step function in mainframe and software demand and also acknowledge that IBM has the cash flow to absorb medium sized M&A, but the impetus to step in and defend the structure at these levels is not obvious to us.
Laterals: The clearest potential beneficiaries from IBM's commentary are hardware providers levered to the spending categories being prioritized, such as servers and storage at DELL and HPE, and memory at MU. Conversely, the update may reinforce concerns around software names broadly, as well as consulting and IT-services businesses such as ACN and KD, if AI infrastructure investment is crowding out other portions of enterprise technology budgets. That said, we are somewhat surprised by the breadth of the read-through across the group so far this morning. IBM explicitly acknowledged company-specific execution issues, including large deals that failed to close on schedule, and the decision to pre-release more than a week before its scheduled earnings call suggests that its shortfall may be more outlier than industry-wide. We understand that this is a "sell first, ask questions later" market, but we would be cautious about treating IBM's results as a 1:1 read-through to every software and services company.
Laterals: The clearest potential beneficiaries from IBM's commentary are hardware providers levered to the spending categories being prioritized, such as servers and storage at DELL and HPE, and memory at MU. Conversely, the update may reinforce concerns around software names broadly, as well as consulting and IT-services businesses such as ACN and KD, if AI infrastructure investment is crowding out other portions of enterprise technology budgets. That said, we are somewhat surprised by the breadth of the read-through across the group so far this morning. IBM explicitly acknowledged company-specific execution issues, including large deals that failed to close on schedule, and the decision to pre-release more than a week before its scheduled earnings call suggests that its shortfall may be more outlier than industry-wide. We understand that this is a "sell first, ask questions later" market, but we would be cautious about treating IBM's results as a 1:1 read-through to every software and services company.
Bloomberg tracked analysts have an average 12-month price target of $300 on IBM, highlighting how far Wall Street expectations had run ahead of the shock preliminary second-quarter results earlier. Of the 25 analysts covering the stock, 17 rate it a Buy, six are Neutral and just two recommend selling.
SaaSpocalypse Is Back: IBM Crashes Most Since 1987 As Customers Abruptly "Shift CapEx Spending"IBM shares plunged almost 20% in premarket trading, putting the stock on track for its worst intra-day collapse since the infamous Oct. 19, 1987.
Worse than the Dot Com crash...
The catalyst for the selloff was IBM CEO Arvind Krishna's letter to investors outlining preliminary second-quarter results.
Here is what's key:
- IBM CEO: DID NOT ANTICIPATE MAGNITUDE OF CAPEX REPRIORITIZATION
Traders were likely caught off guard by a 7% decline in infrastructure revenue, raising new concerns about demand across one of IBM's key business segments.
Here are the preliminary 2Q results:
-
Revenue of $17.2 billion, up 1%
-
Software revenue up 5%
-
Consulting revenue flat, up 1% at constant currency
-
Infrastructure revenue down 7%
Krishna detailed in the letter to investors that customers unexpectedly redirected their June technology budgets toward servers, storage and memory to secure scarce equipment before anticipated price increases.
In return, that left less money and management attention available for IBM's z17 mainframes and related transaction-processing software. Deals IBM expected to close during the quarter were delayed or pushed into later periods, rather than necessarily canceled outright.
Here are Bloomberg headlines:
-
IBM CEO: SAW CLIENTS SHIFT QUARTERLY CAPEX SPEND IN JUNE
-
IBM CEO: THIS DYNAMIC IMPACTED CLIENT BUYING PATTERNS
Signaling a return to the SaaSpocalypse (client spend shifting from commoditized software to constrained hardware), Krishna wrote:
When we discussed our expectations with you in April, we noted that we would be wrapping on the launch of z17 in the second quarter.
Given this was the strongest start to a mainframe program in our history, we expected Infrastructure revenue to decline low-single digits for the year, beginning this quarter.
What played out was worse than our expectations, driven by a shortfall in our Z performance and the associated software stack, primarily in Transaction Processing.
In the last few weeks of June, we saw clients shift their quarterly capex spend toward servers, storage, and memory purchases to secure supply-constrained infrastructure ahead of expected price increases.
This dynamic impacted client buying patterns. While we anticipated some supply chain related impact in our expectations, we did not anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization.
In addition, clients were distracted with rapidly-evolving, industry-wide cybersecurity concerns in the quarter.
Krishna also admitted: "We did not adapt and move quickly enough," with large deals failing to close on expected timelines.
The key question is whether IBM is emerging as an early warning sign that the AI boom is beginning to crack, with a potential "token revolt" taking shape as customers push back against surging AI costs.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 15:36