Aggregator
Kylie Jenner’s new Khy x Frankies Bikinis collab includes her ‘dream’ swimsuits
ICE told to halt vehicle stops after 2 fatal shootings, as agents say it will hamstring them
California high-speed rail seeks federal funds despite Trump pulling back $4B
Major change for California housing that will see cheap homes spring up across state
China's Helium Export Ban Raises New Risks For Global Supply Chains
Authored by Michael Zhuang via The Epoch Times,
China has imposed a temporary ban on helium exports, adding fresh uncertainty to global supplies of a gas essential to semiconductor manufacturing, aerospace, medical equipment, and other high-tech industries.
The first pilot helium production facility in Europe, located in Saint-Parize-le-Châtel, France, on Sept. 11, 2024. FREDERIC MOREAU/Hans Lucas via AFP/Getty ImagesThe July 10 announcement by China's Ministry of Commerce and General Administration of Customs comes as Beijing faces mounting pressure on its own helium supplies following disruptions to imports from Qatar and Russia.
Analysts who spoke to The Epoch Times say the move appears primarily aimed at safeguarding China's domestic supply rather than directly targeting the United States. However, since Chinese companies have increasingly served as intermediaries for Russian helium exports, the restriction could further disrupt global supply chains, particularly in Europe.
Beijing Announces Temporary Export BanThe Chinese regime said the export restriction was imposed under the country's Foreign Trade Law. It took effect immediately. The regime did not specify how long the temporary measure would remain in place.
Helium is a colorless, odorless, non-toxic inert gas extracted as a byproduct of natural gas processing. Since it cannot be manufactured or replenished, it is considered a strategic resource.
The gas plays a critical role in semiconductor production, where it is used for wafer cooling, plasma etching, chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, photolithography support, and leak detection. It is also widely used in medical imaging, aerospace, scientific research, and advanced manufacturing.
Despite expanding domestic production, China still relies heavily on imported helium.
According to industry data from China Fortune Securities, approximately 84 percent of China's helium supply is dependent on foreign imports, with natural gas producers Qatar and Russia accounting together for nearly half of global helium production. The United States is the world's largest helium producer, producing more than 40 percent of global production.
China sources roughly 46 percent of its helium imports from Qatar and about 35 percent from Russia. But these import channels have come under increasing pressure this year.
According to a report on Chinese news portal Sina, maritime routes carrying Qatari helium through the Persian Gulf were disrupted amid the Iran war. In April, Russia announced temporary export controls on helium through the end of 2027, reducing export quotas to Asia to roughly 40 percent of 2025 levels. The China Liquefied Natural Gas Association estimated that those developments have created a helium supply shortfall exceeding 60 percent for China.
Cheng Cheng-ping, a professor of finance at Taiwan's National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, told The Epoch Times that Beijing's decision appears to be driven largely by domestic supply concerns rather than geopolitical retaliation.
"The timing suggests this is primarily an act of self-preservation," he said. "It is different from previous export controls on rare earths, which were more directly aimed at the United States."
Beijing has been working to expand China's domestic semiconductor industry while reducing reliance on advanced chips restricted by U.S. export controls.
"China is engaged in intense competition with the United States in high-end industries but remains behind technologically," Cheng said. "Restricting exports allows it to retain more resources to support its own advanced manufacturing."
Shen Ming-shih, a research fellow at Taiwan's Institute for National Defense and Security Research, told The Epoch Times that several factors likely influenced the decision, but domestic industrial demand appears to be the primary consideration.
"The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can still import helium from Russia for now," Shen said. "But if Russian supplies tighten further through 2027 while imports from other sources remain constrained, China's own helium resources will become increasingly scarce."
China's Role as a Russian Helium MiddlemanWhile the export restrictions may help preserve domestic supplies, they could also tighten international markets because Chinese companies have become important intermediaries in the global helium trade.
According to a June report by U.K.-based industry intelligence firm Gasworld, Western sanctions have largely prevented Russia from exporting helium directly to Europe. Instead, Chinese companies have been importing Russian helium at relatively low prices - often in volumes exceeding China's own domestic consumption - and re-exporting part of those shipments to overseas markets, including Europe.
Russian helium exports to China averaged 38 million cubic feet per month in 2025, a 60 percent increase from the previous year, according to the report. Shipments reached 71 million cubic feet in December alone.
China's export ban could further tighten global helium supplies because of the country's growing role as a redistribution hub for Russian helium.
Cheng said the United States is unlikely to be significantly affected because of its own supplies.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the United States accounted for 44 percent of global helium production in 2024, followed by Qatar at 34 percent, Russia at 9 percent, and Algeria at 6 percent.
"The impact will be much greater for Europe and other countries that previously relied on Russian or Qatari helium but increasingly obtained those supplies through China," Cheng said.
With Russian exports constrained by sanctions and Middle Eastern supplies facing periodic disruptions, China has gained considerable leverage as an intermediary, he said.
"By restricting exports now, China is increasing risks across the global supply chain," Cheng said.
He added that Beijing has previously leveraged its position in global supply chains to exert pressure on agricultural imports from Australia, Brazil, and Taiwan.
"Now, helium has become another example," Cheng said. "China is only an intermediary, but it is using that position as a tool to influence markets and supply chains. Companies trading with authoritarian regimes need to factor these risks into their supply-chain planning."
Shen said the ultimate impact of the export restrictions will depend on how heavily individual countries rely on Chinese helium exports and whether they can secure alternative suppliers.
European countries may experience greater short-term disruptions, he said, but the move could also encourage importers to diversify their sources and reduce dependence on China.
Tang Bing, Luo Ya, and Reuters contributed to this report.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 13:05Best places to sell your gold/jewelry, reviewed and accredited
Kalshi promo code NYPMAX: Trade $10, get $15 for MLB All-Star Game
Parents of teens lose 48 nights of sleep per year worrying about their children’s growing online presence: survey
Warren Buffett halts Gates Foundation donations after Jeffrey Epstein ties revealed
Milania Giudice allegedly punched victim in forehead before domestic violence arrest
David Beckham defends Victoria’s tepid reaction to England’s electric World Cup moment
Nolan Wells’ friend spills on viral pool party photo as mom reveals heartache of planning son’s funeral
Burn double the calories for a third of the price while this weighted vest is on sale
Just 27.6% Of Stocks Outperform The Market While 60% Destroy Shareholder Wealth, New Study Finds
From 1926 through 2025, just 27.6% of stocks beat the broader market. Nearly 60% actually destroyed shareholder wealth, and the median stock delivered a lifetime return of -6.9%. Yet despite those sobering odds, U.S. stocks collectively created roughly $91 trillion in wealth over the last century, with just 46 companies responsible for half of it.
Those are some of the headline findings from a new study by Hendrik Bessembinder of Arizona State University's W.P. Carey School of Business, who examined the performance of nearly 30,000 U.S. stocks over the last century. The research paints a striking picture of how wealth is actually created in the stock market: while broad market indexes have generated exceptional long-term returns, the vast majority of individual stocks have failed to keep pace.
Bessembinder analyzed 29,754 publicly traded U.S. stocks between 1926 and 2025. Over that period, the overall stock market produced an annualized return of about 10.1%, turning every dollar invested into more than $15,000, according to the study, detailed in this white paper.
But those impressive aggregate returns mask an uncomfortable reality. The typical stock fared far worse. In fact, the median stock lost 6.9% over its lifetime, fewer than half of all stocks generated a positive lifetime return, only about 41% outperformed Treasury bills during the time they were publicly traded, and just 27.6% managed to outperform the market itself.
The reason is simple: stock market returns are incredibly uneven. While any stock can fall to zero, there is effectively no limit to how much a winner can rise. Over long periods, a tiny number of extraordinary companies generate gains so large that they more than offset the thousands of stocks that stagnate, disappoint, or disappear altogether. Those rare winners account for an outsized share of the market's overall success.
Perhaps the most surprising finding is that this concentration has become even more extreme. In Bessembinder's original research covering 1926 through 2016, 89 companies accounted for half of all shareholder wealth created by the U.S. stock market. After adding the last nine years of data, total wealth creation more than doubled to roughly $91 trillion, yet the number of companies responsible for half of it fell to just 46.
At the top of the list are many of today's biggest technology names. Apple ranks first, generating more than $5 trillion in shareholder wealth, followed by Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon. Collectively, those five companies account for more than one-fifth of all net wealth created by the U.S. stock market over the past century, while Apple and Nvidia alone make up more than one-tenth of the total.
The concentration becomes even more remarkable further down the data. Out of more than 29,000 companies included in the study, just 1,082, less than 4% of the total, were responsible for all of the market's net wealth creation. Meanwhile, nearly six out of every ten companies actually reduced shareholder wealth relative to simply investing in one month Treasury bills.
The study also pushes back against the idea that market legends are built on impossible annual returns. Many of history's greatest investments didn't earn 50% or 100% per year. Instead, they compounded at annual rates in the low to mid teens over extraordinarily long periods. The lesson is that consistent returns sustained over decades are often far more powerful than eye popping gains that prove impossible to maintain.
For investors, the findings reinforce one of the strongest arguments for diversification. While the stock market as a whole has created enormous wealth over the past century, identifying the relatively small group of companies that ultimately drive those returns has always been exceptionally difficult. Missing just a handful of those long-term winners can dramatically reduce investment results, which helps explain why broad index funds have consistently outperformed most active stock pickers over long horizons.
Bessembinder concludes that the tendency for a small number of companies to drive most of the market's returns is unlikely to disappear because it is a natural consequence of how returns compound over time. The bigger question, he suggests, is whether technologies like artificial intelligence will make wealth creation even more concentrated in a handful of dominant firms, or broaden the playing field enough to create the next generation of market leaders.
You can read the full white paper here.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 12:45Iran claims attacks on Bahrain, Jordan, Strait of Hormuz after latest US strikes
Mystery as California mom vanishes after dropping daughter off at summer camp
AI Companies Absorbing Office Space At Record Pace: Report
Authored by Rob Sabo via The Epoch Times,
Artificial intelligence (AI) firms are absorbing office space in primary markets such as San Francisco and New York City at a record pace, and the sector’s voracious demand for office space to build out development teams and products has begun spilling into a select subset of submarkets as well.
National AI office demand was up 85 percent in the 12 months through May and spiked 179 percent in major AI hubs, a new AI report published on July 9 by AI-powered commercial real estate platform VTS states.
AI companies represented office demand of 16.8 million square feet across 17 markets during the period, VTS senior research manager Rene Moreira noted.
However, three metro areas represented nearly two-thirds of total office demand from AI companies, with San Francisco—the global epicenter for AI talent and development—accounting for 25 percent.
Office properties in San Francisco and Silicon Valley, California, and New York accounted for 63 percent of all current AI leasing, Moreira said.
“San Francisco alone sits at 5 million square feet, nearly a third of the national total,” he said.
Unprecedented office demand from AI companies in San Francisco is powering the city’s office market to a modest recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic. In the second quarter of 2019, San Francisco’s office market hit a vacancy rate of 4.7 percent. Vacancy soared following work-from-home initiatives, however, reaching 30 percent in 2023 and topping out at 35.7 percent as recently as the second quarter of 2025, the City of San Francisco reported.
San Francisco’s office vacancy stood at 32.6 percent at the end of the first quarter of this year.
“San Francisco’s 81 active AI requirements average 62,000 square feet, 2.3 times the average tech requirement across all markets,” Moreira said.
The 45 active AI office lease searches in New York average 61,00 square feet each, while the 58 active searches in Silicon Valley average about 48,000 square feet, or 2.8 million square feet of office space.
Each submarket caters to different AI users, VTS noted. San Francisco is the headquarters of AI pioneers Anthropic (Claude) and OpenAI (ChatGPT), while Silicon Valley’s AI firms tend to be chip designers, hardware manufacturers, and infrastructure providers. New York’s AI companies are skewed toward enterprise-level AI firms, a nod to the city’s massive financial, legal, and media industries. AI firms in Washington, such as Anduril, Palantir, and Shield AI, serve the defense industry.
ExpansionAs the industry continues to grow, other markets are likely to become AI epicenters themselves, VTS said. Expansion will hit primary office markets such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Austin, Texas.
Seattle has already experienced a 390 percent year-over-year spike in growth from AI-related demand, the report said, signaling that outward expansion is already underway.
“Three pressures will push demand outward: AI engineering talent is scarce, San Francisco real estate is expensive, and 25 percent of active AI demand concentrated in a single submarket will produce the crowding that pushed prior cycles outward,” VTS said.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 12:25KeyBanc Downgrades Apple On New Growth Slowdown Fears
Apple shares fell 1% in premarket trading after KeyBanc Capital Markets downgraded the iPhone maker to "Underweight" from "Sector Weight" and set a 12-month price target of $250. This implies roughly a 21% decline from Monday's close, putting the stock in bear-market territory.
The downgrade by KeyBanc analysts Brandon Nispel and John Vinh is based on a widening disconnect between Apple's valuation and its underlying growth outlook. They cite soaring memory chip prices, which are pushing iPhone, Mac, and iPad prices higher. This increases the risk of demand destruction, slower unit sales, and a softer upgrade cycle.
At roughly 35 times forward earnings, Nispel warned that Apple's valuation leaves little room for a slowdown:
We downgrade AAPL to Underweight ($250PT; 19x '27 EV/EBITDA, 27.5x PE).
Our KFLD shows Indexed Spending -2% m/m, which is below the three-year avg of +9% m/m, another month of below-trend growth.
We think expectations NT are reasonable though we see: 1) slowing iPhone builds with price increases, weak U.S. upgrades, and changing device subsidy models; 2) '27 expectations that likely need to move lower for Mac, iPad, and Wearables; and 3) as unit growth likely slows, so will the growth in Apple's user base, likely pressuring Services. At 35x PE, we think AAPL is too expensive for this to occur
In mid-June, Apple CEO Tim Cook told the WSJ in an exclusive interview that price hikes were "unavoidable" because of the memory chip crunch.
While Apple doesn't report gross profit margins for individual products, TechInsights research suggests the margin on the $1,099 iPhone 17 Pro was a tidy 47%. Based on estimated costs, to maintain that profit margin for the iPhone 18 Pro, the company would have to charge $1,371. Because the company likes standardized pricing, the starting price tag would more likely be $1,299, yielding a 44% gross profit.
Source: WSJAnd this calculation doesn't account for a potential new camera system that will also cost Apple about 50% more than previous models, according to supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. In that case, following the same math, Apple could set the starting price of the iPhone 18 Pro at $1,399, or higher.
KeyBanc's view that consumers may push back on an upgrade cycle because of rising device prices - due in part to the memory chip crunch - is not the best news ahead of the iPhone 18 Pro and foldable iPhone launches in September.
The full KeyBanc report is available to professional subscribers.
Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 12:20