Aggregator

Shields' co-star, Christopher Atkins, said director Randal Kleiser meddled in their love lives when they made the 1980 movie.

Shields' co-star, Christopher Atkins, said director Randal Kleiser meddled in their love lives when they made the 1980 movie.

The biggest celebrities are in attendance for the 2026 Wimbledon Tennis Championships in London, England. On this episode of “Currently Trending,” Page Six Style & Shopping Director Elana Fishman is breaking down the best-dressed stars in the stands. As patron of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, Kate Middleton is a Wimbledon regular...

The biggest celebrities are in attendance for the 2026 Wimbledon Tennis Championships in London, England. On this episode of “Currently Trending,” Page Six Style & Shopping Director Elana Fishman is breaking down the best-dressed stars in the stands. As patron of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, Kate Middleton is a Wimbledon regular...

Ensure sweat-proof sleep during the NYC heat wave in breathable PJs.

Two under-the-radar stars are worth backing in Tuesday's World Cup semifinal.

The finale countdown is officially on.

Warsh emphasized the Fed’s commitment to focusing on price pressures – a stance that typically indicates a bias toward raising interest rates, not lowering them.

Watch: Smug NYT Podcaster Visibly Annoyed When Mick Jagger Defends Elon Musk

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

Mick Jagger just delivered a masterclass in cutting through media spin, leaving a leftist New York Times podcaster visibly rattled as he clarified that his "mad mogul" lyric about Elon Musk was actually a compliment.

The Rolling Stones legend refused to play along with the expected narrative during the interview, pushing back firmly when the host, David Marchese, presumed the line was a diss.

Instead, Jagger highlighted Musk's real-world achievements in space, crediting him with stepping up where government agencies have fallen short.

Watch the NYT podcaster's face when he realizes Mick Jagger likes and respects Elon Musk—after initially thinking a new Rolling Stones song lyric was a diss:

NYT: "But something's nagging at you, what is it?"

Jagger: "No, it's not nagging. It's just that people, they hear one... pic.twitter.com/UuuIgPSSyG

— Julia ?? (@Jules31415) July 14, 2026

In the exchange, Jagger explained the context behind the lyric from the new Rolling Stones album Foreign Tongues. He pointed to the rescue of the stranded NASA astronauts last year, noting that Musk's SpaceX provided the transportation NASA couldn't.

Jagger told the interviewer: "It's not nagging, but people hear one word and they don't really listen to the line. So it's like, 'Mick Jagger has a go at Elon Musk.' You're not listening to the line, you're only listening to 'Musk.' ... even though I do call him mad."

Marchese's expression totally changed from smiling to frowning in an instant when Jagger refused to confirm the interviewer's gleeful expectation that the singer would criticise Musk.

He continued: "When I wrote that, I was thinking that because of him, they were able to get those astronauts back that were stuck because he provided the transportation because NASA couldn't provide the transportation..."

"Who would you trust to get you into space?" Jagger continued, adding "Would you trust Boeing or would you trust NASA or would you trust mad mogul Mr. Musk? It's really a side-winding compliment because he was the one I remembered was able to do that when the others couldn't."

Jagger exposed how Marchese had completely misinterpreted the lyrics of the song, making him look foolish.

The podcaster pressed on, noting Musk was the only person named on the album, implying significance.

Jagger stood his ground, adding that "mogul doesn't always go down well, either," and the host again showed how one dimensional he is by suggesting "No one likes a mogul."

Jagger was clearly exhausted with the exchange as Marchese simply refused to understand what the singer was getting at.

In another recent NYT interview, Jagger contrasted his approach to performing live with Bruce Springsteen's rabid anti-Trump activism, emphasizing that his job is to give fans a great time, not sermonize.

Jagger's nuanced expression underscores a refreshing independence in an industry often dominated by predictable elite consensus, and his clarity cuts against the grain of performative outrage.

Moments like this expose the disconnect between coastal media bubbles and ground-level realities.

The Rolling Stones continue to prove their enduring relevance not by chasing trends, but by staying true to a no-nonsense ethos that prioritizes delivery over dogma. Jagger's unapologetic take serves as a subtle rebuke to those who weaponize art for division rather than unity through great music and honest reflection.

Jagger gets it - focus on what works, entertain the audience, and let results speak louder than spin. In a free society, that kind of straight talk is exactly what keeps culture vibrant against efforts to enforce conformity.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 10:05

Judge William Orrick strikes again. The Barack Obama-appointed judge for the Northern District of California has blocked the Trump administration from cutting off federal grants to cities that use discriminatory "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) policies.

A former Michigan football coach is alleging in a lawsuit that the school and its leadership at the time were aware of Connor Stalions' sign-stealing scandal and had attempted to keep it from ever being discovered. 

Why Hunter Biden and Nick Fuentes sat down for a interview in a fake Philly motel room.

An iconic mountaintop property on St Barth was quietly sold 18 months ago to Laurie-Lynn Stark, co-founder of Chrome Hearts.

New England Patriots head coach Mike Vrabel was soaking in the sun poolside at Victory Ranch, a private residential luxury real estate community in Utah.

Hollywood talent agency Verve is facing a steep climb as it contends with financial struggles and a talent exodus.

Paramount is enlisting a well-known crisis comms firm Brunswick Group as it battles lawsuit to block Warner Bros. deal.

Warsh Tells Congress Fed Has "No Tolerance For Elevated Inflation": Watch His Testimony Live

Fed Chair Warsh (voter) will deliver his first semi-annual testimony as Fed Chair to the House. Warsh’ text was e released at 08:30EDT (link here) and he is scheduled to begin his testimony at 10:00EDT.

In his prepared remarks, Warsh said policymakers at the central bank have no tolerance for high inflation, reiterating a vow to tame price growth that has been elevated for five years. 

“The members of our committee have no tolerance for persistently elevated inflation,” Warsh said Tuesday in testimony he’s scheduled to deliver before lawmakers at 10 a.m. “And we share a resolute commitment to restoring price stability.”

The new Fed chairman has emphasized policymakers’ commitment to tackling inflation since he took office in May, and said the number one objective is to get monetary policy right: “If we get policy right — and we will — the inflation surge of the last five years will be a thing of the past,” Warsh said. 

As Bloombgerg notes, Warsh’s remarks before the panel come amid warnings from several other Fed policymakers that higher interest rates may be needed to curb inflation, especially in the context of soaring memory prices.

Warsh was upbeat on the overall economy, describing the labor market as broadly stable with few signs of layoffs and solid nominal wage growth. The Fed chief was more circumspect on the artificial intelligence boom, which he said is driving a surge in business investment but also posing uncertainties for the economy.

“We don’t know the extent to which the economy will benefit from the AI build-out. Yet it seems inevitable that what is now called "AI investment" will soon be called just "investment." Even so, new opportunities for the economy introduce new challenges for policymakers. We at the Fed are monitoring the implications for inflation and the labor market." Warsh said.

“New opportunities for the economy introduce new challenges for policymakers. We at the Fed are monitoring the implications for inflation and the labor market.”

Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s June 16-17 meeting reflected growing concern among policymakers over inflation just as worries over the labor market slightly receded. New rate projections released alongside that decision showed nine officials foresaw at least one quarter-point hike this year, with six anticipating at least two. Another nine expected no move or a cut. Warsh, who has been critical of so-called forward guidance that offers clues on the path for rates, declined to submit a forecast.

The testimony was prepared prior to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ release of fresh inflation data that showed consumer prices declined in June for the first time in six years and a key gauge of underlying inflation was little changed. As noted earlier, headline CPI fell 0.4% from May, mostly reflecting a slump in energy prices amid a pause in the US and Iran war. However, a resumption of hostilities has since sent oil prices surging again with Brent crude topping $87 a barrel for the first time in a month and threatens to push inflation sharply higher again. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, was flat. On a year-over-year basis, core prices increased by a slower-than-expected 2.6%.

The Fed has kept rates between 3.50-3.75% for four straight meetings, and Warshʼs term begins amid a backdrop of sticky inflation, potential tariff pass-throughs, and energy supply shocks, which have stoked fears of further policy tightening. The Fedʼs June meeting minutes released this week showed that some officials support resuming hikes ahead; while traders will look to Warshʼs remarks for any explicit thresholds that could trigger a rate rise, Warsh has notoriously leaned against any forms of forward guidance.

Speaking last week, Warsh reiterated the Fed will not provide it, describing it as an obstacle to healthy FOMC debate; he added that rates should be the primary monetary policy tool, and expressed hope that new tech can improve economic understanding within a period of 9-12 months.

Watch his testimony live at 10am ET

Warsh's full prepared remarks are below:

Chairman Hill, Ranking Member Waters, and other members of the Committee—good morning.

It's a privilege to join you. At my first appearance before this panel, I am particularly honored to represent my superb colleagues throughout the Federal Reserve System.

In submitting the Board's Monetary Policy Report, I think of a long line of central bank chiefs who came before Congress in keeping with the Federal Reserve Act. I think also of earlier efforts, going back to the time of the Framers, to create a central bank that would endure and serve the nation's founding principles.

One of the large figures in the Federal Reserve's history is Alan Greenspan, who passed away last month after a century of life. By my count, my friend appeared before Congress more than two hundred times, displaying his agile mind and his distinctive way with words. We at the Fed recall the Chairman's strong and steady hand in a period of rapid economic change. And we honor his memory.

As a country, we just marked our 250th year. And when Americans count our blessings, we can include an economy predicated on the brilliance of our constitutional design and system of ordered liberty—an economy without equal in all it's done for human flourishing.

Some forms of Fed communications are discretionary, but not this one—and for good reason. It is a prudent and wisely conceived obligation, designed to keep the Fed accountable, responsible, and faithful to its congressional mandate of full employment and price stability. These obligations are of a piece with the Fed's rightful independence in the conduct of monetary policy.

Today we are at a hinge point in history. It's up to all of us to meet this moment. The task of this generation of policymakers—and of individuals throughout the private sector—is to ensure the American economy excels far into the future.

* * * *

The Fed's number one objective is to get monetary policy right—or as near to it as we possibly can. That is our clear and constant aim, the star we steer by. And if we get policy right—and we will—the inflation surge of the last five years will be a thing of the past.

A month ago, I chaired my first meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee. My colleagues and I recognize that high inflation has been an undue burden on American households and businesses. While monthly price fluctuations are inevitable—especially in an unsettled world—underlying inflation over longer time horizons is determined largely by monetary policy.

The members of our Committee have no tolerance for persistently elevated inflation. And we share a resolute commitment to restoring price stability. This was the focus of our June meeting, at which we decided to hold the target range for the federal funds rate at 3-1/2 to 3-3/4 percent.

Naturally, our work at the Fed demands a proper reading on economic conditions. As you see in our Monetary Policy Report, economic activity is expanding at a solid pace, showing resilience in the face of recent developments. Household consumption growth is moderate. Manufacturing output has moved up steadily this year. The housing sector, however, gives a different picture and continues to lag.

The most striking feature of the economy right now is business investment. The rapid pace—which appears to be accelerating—reflects, in large part, the construction of data centers and the immense demand for the AI-related equipment and software that fill them. Investment in equipment overall increased about 8 percent for the year ending in the first quarter. Within that category, high-tech spending logged an especially impressive growth rate of nearly 25 percent on a four-quarter basis. We don't know the extent to which the economy will benefit from the AI buildout. Yet it seems inevitable that what is now called "AI investment" will soon be called just "investment." Even so, new opportunities for the economy introduce new challenges for policymakers. We at the Fed are monitoring the implications for inflation and the labor market.

That brings me to the supply side, where productivity growth has been strong, predating gains from AI adoption. America's labor market appears broadly stable. Job creation has kept pace with the workforce. The unemployment rate is low and has changed little over the past year. We're seeing relatively few layoffs, only slight variance in the rate of job vacancies, and solid growth in nominal wages.

* * * *

I came to my new position as a believer in the best traditions of the Federal Reserve. The performance of our nation's central bank depends on a commitment to excellence, professionalism, and integrity. Humility about what we know—and the courage to revisit our prior views—are also hallmarks of a great institution like ours. All of these standards define the culture of the Fed, and it's my responsibility to uphold them.

I am heartened by the welcome I've received and by the encouragement of my colleagues in considering how best to advance the conduct of policy. We have a duty to point the institution forward—to take a fresh look at current practices to make sure we are serving our objectives.

And we are going about it systematically. I have appointed a task force in each of five areas that are central to the broad conduct of monetary policy. We have engaged some of the very best minds, from inside and outside the economics profession. They are supported by specialists from the Fed's expert staff. The task forces have been given a straightforward charge: Start with first principles, ask hard questions, examine current practices, consider alternatives, and, ultimately, propose next steps for policymaker consideration. The purpose here is to equip the Fed to make better decisions in monetary policy and to put these years of high inflation behind us.

The first task force will assess the form and function of Fed communications. It will ask: What is the efficacy, and what are the risks, of how we currently deliberate and convey our policy choices?

The second task force will review the Fed's balance sheet policies, including the ample-reserves regime and the composition of asset holdings. It will ask: What are the advantages and disadvantages of that regime, and what are the alternatives?

The third task force will evaluate new data sources and consider methodological changes to improve the information upon which we rely. It will ask: How do we ensure that policymakers are receiving accurate, relevant, contemporaneous, actionable data on the state of our economy?

Our task force on productivity and jobs will survey the pace, reach, and impact of new general-purpose technologies. We've experienced technological advances all our lives. But given the scale of investment—and potential changes in the method and speed of innovation—we might be seeing changes of a different order. The task force will survey the landscape and ask: What do these changes mean for America's productive capacity and for American workers? And what are the implications for the Fed in pursuit of our employment and inflation mandates?

Finally, the task force on inflation frameworks will examine the drivers of inflation and weigh a range of ideas for delivering price stability. This group will ask: Do our models and our thinking provide an empirically robust view of prices and outputs in our dynamic economy? Can we do better?

We are starting a new chapter at the Federal Reserve at a consequential time for our nation. It's been a privilege to return to the Fed and to work again with so many talented and dedicated people I'm fortunate to call my colleagues.

I can report to you that we intend to be fit for purpose and focused on the future. We are the Federal Reserve, and we are as determined as ever to fulfill the mission that Congress has given us.

Thank you, and I welcome your questions.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/14/2026 - 09:45

"The bottom line is he’d been fighting various forms of cancer for at least the last five years intensively,” Laura Tingle said on "Sydney Mornings."

"The bottom line is he’d been fighting various forms of cancer for at least the last five years intensively,” Laura Tingle said on "Sydney Mornings."

Two dim-witted wannabe influencers are being investigated after going wildly viral for filming themselves stroking alligators in Florida — just days after a swimmer was killed by one. “Come with us to pet alligators,” TikTokker Kileigh Rose wrote of the death-defying foolishness her and a friend reckoned would be part of a fun “Steve Irwin...