Aggregator
Gavin Newsom pumps $2.4B into struggling California schools — as special ed enrollment skyrockets
Israel warned US of new Iranian plot to kill Trump: report
Martin Scorcese’s AI adventure points to Hollywood’s future — like it or not
Nets second-rounder Tyler Bilodeau out to prove he’s more than a one-trick pony
"Turn Off Bluetooth, Use Signal": ACLU Advises Anti-Trump Protesters On Evading Gov't Surveillance
If you want a sign of how the left-wing, permanent protest-industrial complex is gearing up for the next wave of street mobilization, look no further than Chad Marlow, a senior policy counsel at the ACLU.
Marlow, whose work focuses on privacy, surveillance, and technology, has circulated guidance for protesters on social media about how to limit digital exposure, avoid government surveillance, and communicate via encrypted messaging platforms while protesting.
"If you're protesting and not actively using your phone, the best thing you can do to prevent it from sharing information about you and your location is to shut it off entirely. If you want to turn on your phone to take pictures and record video during the day, turn your phone on, enable Airplane Mode, and turn off Bluetooth. That way, your phone won't be inadvertently sharing your private location and other data while you're using it," Marlow said in a video posted on Instagram.
He continued, "If you need to use your phone, turn it on while you're communicating, then shut it off when you're done. By the way, it's always safest to use a fully encrypted app like Signal, which makes it more difficult for the government to intercept your communications."
After the North Texas Antifa defendants were convicted over the anti-ICE terror shooting attack and the Minnesota Antifa cell suspects were indicted for anti-government violence, leftist groups have been releasing guides on how to hide and destroy digital evidence.
The ACLU is… https://t.co/HfQv37KL0a pic.twitter.com/WRSFSgGxqf
The ACLU is listed as a proud partner of the failed No Kings rally, an event that is far from organic; instead, it is a heavily coordinated coalition of far-left socialist groups, NGOs, and unions seeking a socialist revolution by toppling Trump.
Marlow's educational session on how protesters can limit digital exposure and evade government surveillance is certainly not a good look for a nonprofit that claims to defend all civil liberties. Instead, it has become a legal arm of far-left protesters.
Related:
Concerns that the ACLU is no longer merely protecting constitutional rights but is increasingly helping to equip DSA-aligned protesters for their revolution are very troubling, given what socialists say in their own words:
DSA Members: "The most important thing we can do is take America down from within" pic.twitter.com/phicruCxKe
— DSA Watch (@DSA_Watch) July 8, 2026This blurs the line between civil-liberties advocacy and activist support infrastructure at a time when the broader protest-industrial complex appears to be gearing up for the next round of street chaos.
Tyler Durden Thu, 07/09/2026 - 21:20Inside Margaret Qualley and Jack Antonoff’s breakup as former couple navigate split with ‘love and kindness’
Inside Margaret Qualley and Jack Antonoff’s breakup as former couple navigate split with ‘love and kindness’
Ohio house of horrors suspect granted bail because his medical care could ‘bankrupt’ the county, prosecutor says
Florida girl, 2, dies after babysitter leaves her in blistering hot car for 3 hours
Nuggets release veteran big man Jonas Valanciunas, who has ties to Leon Rose
LAUSD running out of cash as deadline looms to fix financial mess, parents told nothing is wrong
California fast-food wage law –– a DoorDash for destruction
Ukraine war’s pivot point is now — if Trump and Zelensky move fast
Justice Department Agrees To End Biden-Era Oil & Gas Leasing Restrictions In Alaska
Authored by Jill McLaughlin via The Epoch Times,
The U.S. Department of Justice said July 7 the Biden administration’s oil and gas leasing restrictions in northern Alaska’s Arctic region violated federal law and asked the court to dismiss lawsuits by the state and its industrial development and export authority challenging the regulations.
The lawsuits were filed in 2025 over the Biden administration’s 2024 restrictions on oil and gas lease auctions in the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Alaska argued that the administration essentially sabotaged bidding with its restrictions on surface use and occupancy, which made “any development economically and practically impossible.”
“The Biden era Alaska oil and gas leasing program violated the law and improperly limited Alaska’s energy potential with unreasonable regulation,” U.S. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a July 7 press release.
“This settlement supports the Trump administration’s commitment to secure American energy independence and our national security for generations to come,” he added.
Congress set aside 1.5 million acres along the Alaska coast in 1980 for potential oil and gas development, and in 2017 instructed a federal agency to develop the resources on the land. Alaska’s lawsuit claims the Biden administration negated Congress’s directive.
“These resources not only help our energy independence as a nation but also grows the Alaska economy and puts more money in the Alaska Permanent Fund for future generations,” Gov. Mike Dunleavy said in a January 2025 statement.
The settlement says the 2024 leasing program violated the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by abdicating the government’s duty to conduct a second lease sale, closing 75 percent of the 1.56 million-acre Coastal Plain to exploration and leasing, imposing unreasonable surface use restrictions on the remaining 25 percent, and unreasonably restricting surface disturbance.
“This settlement sets the record straight that the Biden administration’s 2024 restrictions on oil and gas production in Alaska were overly restrictive and contrary to Congress’s clear command to establish a competitive oil and gas leasing program in Alaska’s Coastal Plain,” Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said in a statement.
Alaska’s governor’s office and the industrial development and export authority didn’t immediately return requests for comment about the settlement.
The Justice Department also settled a decades-old lawsuit with Alaska on July 7 over a botched federal expansion project at the Don Young Port of Alaska in Anchorage, agreeing to pay the state $180 million.
Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks at the White House in Washington on July 16, 2020. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images
The funds will go toward rebuilding the Don Young Port, according to Dunleavy.
The port serves about 90 percent of Alaska’s population with food, fuel, building materials, and other goods.
Tyler Durden Thu, 07/09/2026 - 20:55LA County moves to rename César Chávez monuments by giving power to the people
Liberty’s uneven first half could be setting up stronger second-half push
Couple who lost everything in Eaton Fire marries on burned property
New Hampshire Kills Historic $100M Bitcoin Bond Proposal
New Hampshire's Executive Council narrowly rejected a proposal Wednesday that would have authorized a $100 million Bitcoin-backed bond, ending what supporters hoped would make the state a pioneer in digital asset finance, according to Bitcoin Magazine.
The measure failed in a 3-2 vote after reaching its final approval stage, despite receiving a favorable rating review from Moody's and backing from Governor Kelly Ayotte and the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority. Had it moved forward, officials said it would have been the first municipal bond in the world secured by Bitcoin.
The report notes that supporters argued the transaction would not put taxpayers at risk. Instead, it would have connected private investors with a private borrower using Bitcoin as collateral, while allowing the state to collect fees that could fund small business, housing, child care, and economic development initiatives if the deal proved successful.
Skeptics, however, questioned whether New Hampshire should attach its name to a financing structure built around a volatile digital asset. Councilor Karen Liot Hill said she was not opposed to cryptocurrency itself but believed the state should be cautious about endorsing a transaction tied to Bitcoin's price swings.
Business Finance Authority Executive Director James Key-Wallace rejected the idea that Bitcoin remains an "emerging" asset class, arguing it has already established itself in global finance. He also suggested the proposal could have opened the door to similar transactions in the future.
Ayotte, who signed legislation making New Hampshire the first state to authorize a strategic Bitcoin reserve and giving the state treasurer authority to invest in Bitcoin, said pursuing innovative financial structures is worthwhile so long as taxpayers remain protected.
The vote came after Liot Hill unsuccessfully attempted to delay consideration of the proposal. She was joined by Janet Stevens and David Wheeler in opposing the measure, while Joseph Kenney and John Stephen voted in favor.
The decision arrives as Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency industry are facing heightened scrutiny. Bitcoin has pulled back from recent highs, while renewed attention has focused on Michael Saylor and Strategy, whose aggressive Bitcoin dividend strategy has drawn increasing debate as the cryptocurrency's price weakens.
That backdrop has put high-profile Bitcoin-related proposals under a brighter spotlight, even as adoption efforts continue at the state and institutional levels.
Tyler Durden Thu, 07/09/2026 - 20:30