Aggregator
Folarin Balogun in USMNT lineup against Belgium as red card drama rages on
Draymond Green could leave Warriors, follow LeBron James to new team
2028 Democrat Presidential Hopeful Exposes Party Civil War Against Its Socialist Wing
Gov. Josh Shapiro sat down with Dana Bash on CNN's State of the Union this weekend and said the quiet part out loud: his party is being overrun by its socialist and far left flank.
Bash pressed Shapiro on Darializa Avila Chevalier, who won the Democratic congressional primary in New York’s 13th congressional district last month while running as an open socialist.
Chevalier's platform includes abolishing prisons, opening the borders, ending deportations, and granting mercy even to violent criminals.
Bash also noted that Chevalier attended a pro-Palestinian rally on October 8, 2023, one day after Hamas terrorists slaughtered, raped, and kidnapped their way across southern Israel.
According to Bash, that rally featured antisemitic rhetoric defending the attack. Bash asked Shapiro how he feels, as a Democrat, about someone with those views heading to Congress.
Shapiro tried to have it both ways.
"Well, her district voted for her," he said. But that statement also came with a convenient disclaimer. "But I have profound differences from that particular candidate, based on the citations that you read there. And she's not someone who, you know, seemingly, I would agree with on many things, or that we share similar values. She ran on the Democratic ticket, I guess as a socialist; her voters in that district determined that she was the one they wanted representing them."
Note the hedge. Shapiro was describing someone who wants to shield violent criminals from deportation and who reportedly stood in solidarity with people cheering a massacre of Jews. Yet, the strongest word he could summon was "seemingly."
Bash followed up by asking what Chevalier's win says about the Democratic Party. Here Shapiro dropped whatever remained of the diplomatic pretense. "I think that what our party has to go through, that will be very healthy, and something that we've not really done since the 1992 elections, is to have a battle over what we believe in," he said.
CNN: Abolishing prisons, opens borders, ending deportations of criminals…what does that say about the Democrat Party?
SHAPIRO: “What our party has to go through that will be very healthy...is to have a battle over what we believe in.” pic.twitter.com/lncogDmeXl
That's a rather pointed reference because 1992 is the year Bill Clinton dragged his party toward the center with promises of welfare reform and law and order, and Shapiro seems to be arguing that's the direction the battle needs to go again, which is clearly not the direction the party is going in.
Trump Derangement Syndrome has spent the better part of a decade radicalizing rank-and-file Democrats who once considered themselves moderates, and the party's growing communist and socialist wing has capitalized on that fever by dragging positions on wealth, taxes, crime, and immigration further left with every election cycle.
The party has also grown more hostile toward Israel, with some pundits arguing it has grown outright antisemitic. That climate may explain why Shapiro sidestepped Bash's question about whether his Jewish faith could complicate a 2028 presidential run. Meanwhile, fellow Pennsylvania Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman, has shown far more willingness to call out his party's antisemitic drift.
Shapiro, being Jewish and a supporter of Israel, places him on a collision course with a Democratic base growing comfortable nominating candidates who marched in solidarity with people, justifying an attack that included the massacre of more than a thousand Israelis.
On paper, Shapiro is the strongest hand the Democrats hold: a two-time statewide election winner in a key swing state.
But the Democratic Party isn’t the same party it was in 1992, and Shapiro’s remarks on CNN made one thing clear: the party’s civil war is already underway.
Tyler Durden Mon, 07/06/2026 - 18:50Zack Wheeler’s agent rips Phillies star’s ‘tone deaf’ All-Star snub
Thieves steal over $4.5M worth of jewelry from French glass museum months after infamous Louvre heist
Why Lakers must add Jonathan Kuminga after Rui Hachimura’s departure
Activists demand Black English be pushed on kids in California preschools
Thibaut Courtois’ wife Mishel stuns in USA-colored bikini before Belgium World Cup game
Americans are discovering the beauty of soccer during this World Cup — but remain befuddled by one thing
Cristiano Ronaldo’s sister sends strong message after Portugal lost in the World Cup to Spain
Argentina Fans Risk Their Jerseys for a Chance at Messi’s Signed Shirt
World Cup 2026: How To Watch the USA Vs. Belgium For Free
Historic Salem home next to town’s infamous ‘Witch House’ listed for $1.9M
Huge change for California homeowners as vital lifeline will be cut off for thousands
Le Bilboquet refuses to shelter people caught in 80mph storm because they don’t have reservations
Le Bilboquet refuses to shelter people caught in 80mph storm because they don’t have reservations
SBA, USDA To Combat 'Regulatory Abuse' Lawfare Aimed At Farmers And Ranchers
Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,
The Small Business Administration (SBA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have signed a memorandum to counter lawfare targeting rural communities, ranchers, farmers, and small businesses.
Ranchers work to evacuate cattle as the Gifford Fire burns nearby in Los Padres National Forest, Calif., on Aug. 4, 2025. AP Photo/Noah BergerLawfare refers to the strategic use of legal proceedings to hinder targets. The SBA's agreement with the USDA gives producers a "direct line to report the regulations and rules driving up costs and impacting productivity," the agency said in a July 2 statement.
It also enables the SBA and the USDA to "identify broader patterns of regulatory abuse to advance lasting deregulatory reform."
The USDA will run a centralized portal that will receive lawfare complaints involving federal agencies, which will be shared with the SBA's Office of the National Ombudsman. Any complaint involving the USDA will be handled by the department, while other complaints will be referred by the SBA to the appropriate agencies.
Under the agreement, the SBA is authorized to analyze complaint data to identify recurring lawfare practices, enforcement, or regulatory issues that are assessed as abusive or disproportionate. This is expected to provide insight that would guide deregulatory action for broader reforms.
In a July 2 X post, SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler said the agreement between the USDA and the SBA lets "producers get back to what they do best: feeding, clothing, and fueling America."
"Family farms should not have to spend time and resources they don't have fighting crushing regulations or costly legal battles waged by radical anti-ag 'environmentalists,' whether they are inside or outside the government," she said.
In its statement, the SBA said the memorandum is in line with a January 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump, "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation."
Trump said in the order that the "ever-expanding morass" of complicated federal regulations was creating "substantial restraint" on economic growth and hampering the country's global competitiveness.
For each new regulation issued by any agency, Trump ordered that at least 10 previous regulations be identified for elimination.
Commenting on the memorandum, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said: "This partnership with the SBA creates clear pathways for redress, ensures fairness in enforcement, and demonstrates that Washington stands with, not against, the hardworking Americans who sustain our country.
"Through the USDA Lawfare Portal and interagency collaboration, we are delivering real protection under the Farmer and Rancher Freedom Framework."
The Farmer and Rancher Freedom Framework is a plan aimed at protecting and preserving American agriculture while ending "onerous regulations" and the weaponization of government against ranchers and farmers, according to a Feb. 11 statement from the USDA.
The plan seeks to defend farmers and ranchers from politically motivated enforcement actions, protect agricultural lands from unnecessary federal projects, and remove burdensome rules that stifle productivity.
It also seeks to reform environmental laws to strike a balance between conservation and common sense.
Deregulatory ActionsThe action against lawfare is one of the latest relief efforts aimed at farmers undertaken by the Trump administration.
On Feb. 2, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued guidance to manufacturers of farm equipment, clarifying that American farmers have the right to repair their own equipment.
The guidance said that manufacturers can no longer use the Clean Air Act to justify limiting farmers' access to repair tools or software.
"EPA is proud to set the record straight and protect farmers. For far too long, manufacturers have wrongly used the Clean Air Act to monopolize the repair markets, hurting our farmers," said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.
However, American manufacturers have opposed the right-to-repair rules. In a Sept. 22, 2025, statement, the Association of Equipment Manufacturers said that more than 50 companies met with lawmakers and congressional staff to push back against right-to-repair mandates.
They warned that legislation advancing such requirements stands to "hurt innovation, raise costs, and risk exposing sensitive trade secrets to competitors or foreign adversaries."
Meanwhile, on March 27, the EPA announced another rule aimed at benefiting farmers, removing the Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) sensor system requirement for all diesel equipment. DEF is a solution injected into the exhaust systems of diesel vehicles to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions.
The EPA said there have been concerns among farmers and other diesel vehicle or equipment operators about DEF system failures.
Shutdowns and speed losses caused by such failures compromise the safety and productivity of operators, which are "unacceptable and problematic," the agency said, adding that removing the DEF sensor system requirement is expected to save farmers and truckers more than $13 billion annually.
Tyler Durden Mon, 07/06/2026 - 18:25