Aggregator
The Overhyped Nuclear Hazard America Has Mastered
Nuclear waste remains one of the most misunderstood aspects of modern energy production in the United States. Critics continue to portray it as a dangerous, unsolvable problem, yet the country has managed it safely and effectively for decades with an impeccable safety record.
Spent fuel from commercial reactors sits securely in pools and dry casks at more than 70 sites across 35 states. Transportation casks have traveled millions of miles without any releases. Not that there was ever a concern for one of these casks breaking open, considering their testing involves being dropped from helicopters and struck by a rocket-propelled locomotive...
Nuclear waste shipping casks have been through a hell of a lot of testing. Now with Red Alert music. pic.twitter.com/D28AgF9Zgp
— Nick Touran (@whatisnuclear) January 17, 2026France reprocesses the vast majority of its used fuel, demonstrating viable technology at commercial scale. In the United States, no significant radiation releases have occurred from commercial nuclear waste storage or handling in over half a century.
We previously covered Visual Capitalist's depiction of nuclear waste around the world and how the most dangerous waste represents less than a quarter of one percent of the total nuclear waste.
A recent Utility Dive article highlights shifting approaches to this issue and examines the Department of Energy’s proposal for “Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses.” These facilities would manage the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including reprocessing or recycling of the nation’s approximately 95,000 metric tons of spent fuel, which increases by roughly 2,000 tons each year.
The campuses aim to combine waste management with regional economic benefits, creating long-term jobs and revenue streams for host states. Interest has already emerged from several states, including Utah, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, Idaho, and Nebraska.
TN is the global epicenter of nuclear energy, & we're grateful for a new opportunity to lead the nation with a proposal to locate a @ENERGY Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus in Oak Ridge.
Link: https://t.co/019O2Hu3Sc pic.twitter.com/26NfsQahP4
U.S. taxpayers currently bear the costs for waste management and legacy cleanup. The DOE’s Environmental Management program operates with an annual budget exceeding $8 billion, while the federal government’s liability for permanent disposal now stands at more than $56 billion. The Trump administration also recently asked for an expansion of the funding.
Yet this material increasingly looks like a valuable resource rather than solely a liability. Private companies are beginning to compete aggressively for access to spent nuclear fuel. The DOE recently awarded over $19 million to firms including Oklo, Curio Solutions, Flibe Energy, and SHINE Technologies to advance recycling, transmutation, and isotope-harvesting technologies.
Startups view the material as a feedstock for new reactor fuel, medical isotopes, and industrial applications rather than waste. As demand grows for high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and specialized isotopes, competition for this resource is expected to intensify.
Nuclear waste is incredibly hazardous, if mishandled. But, America has not mishandled it. With private-sector innovation now treating spent fuel as a strategic asset, the longstanding “problem” is transforming into an economic opportunity.
Drug counselor who delivered fatal dose of ketamine to Matthew Perry is up for sentencing
Five plead guilty to charges in brutal Cincinnati beatdown that went viral last summer
The ideal schedule to propel the Jets into contention
Britain Is Pricing Its Factories Into Oblivion
Authored by Ted Newson via CapX,
At its peak, Britain was known as the workshop of the world. Sheffield produced high-quality steel, Manchester still had a strong textiles sector and the West Midlands was world-renowned for its cars. Glasgow, Sunderland and Newcastle were shipbuilding hubs, Stoke-on-Trent produced ceramics.
Cities around Britain provided steady employment for skilled tradespeople, keeping communities together and wealth distributed around the country. In the 1980s and ’90s, this was underpinned by looser employment regulations and strong energy security through North Sea oil and gas. Businesses could hire who they wanted, for a wage they were comfortable paying and without soaring energy bills to worry about. Just ten years ago, electricity prices were around £31/MWh, today they have almost tripled to around £90/MWh. When competitors such as the United States don’t have a nationwide carbon tax while Britain has had a carbon price floor since 2013, it is easy to see how business can quickly become uncompetitive.
Britain’s industrial sector was promised lower energy bills through renewables; instead, it is paying higher prices and additional taxes to subsidise green policies. The Climate Change Committee recently forecast offshore wind electricity prices of £35/MWh by 2040, the reality suggests that this is unlikely. Using intermittent renewables to power energy-intensive industries brings with it its own problems, creating high energy prices in wind and solar droughts when domestic firm power isn’t readily available.
Even by 1990, around one-sixth of Britain’s GDP came from the manufacturing industry. The country was still in the top five global manufacturing powers and possessed competitive steel, car, and chemical industries. At this time, our industrial energy prices were reasonably similar to the rest of Europe, with allies like Germany and Italy paying more than the UK. Today, the UK’s industrial energy prices have risen by 669 percent—dwarfing increases of 389 percent in Germany and 544 percent in Italy. A driving force behind this is underinvestment in reliable electricity generation and the idealistic belief that intermittent renewables, backed up by government subsidies, can replace firm sources of power such as coal and gas.
In the pursuit of lowering carbon emissions, Britain has abandoned its manufacturing sector. As we have artificially inflated energy prices through policy costs and made employing people harder, our industries have shifted to countries with more business-friendly environments. While rising comparative wage rates naturally encourage industry to shift overseas, the British government has further pushed industry away through deliberate choices. This has created job losses and regional decline as former manufacturing towns lose historic businesses.
Energy-intensive industry such as steel manufacture cannot survive when industrial energy prices are four times that of the United States. In fact, Britain has the fewest steel plants left in the G7, with plummeting production capabilities, especially for virgin steel. No matter how low other input costs are, such high energy costs will repel investment. A recent example of this is the collapse of the long-established pottery firm Denby. While Britain remains gifted with abundant, high-quality clay, energy prices and the transition to electric kilns have rendered the sector unsustainable.
This problem is much the same across the rest of Britain’s manufacturing sector. Energy prices drive up unit costs, before government legislation further entrenches high wage bills and punitive taxes. From every direction, the business sector is attacked—and manufacturers, as the most energy-intensive type of industry, are most exposed. Britain’s deindustrialisation has many causes, but shortcomings in energy and workforce policy go a long way toward explaining why many once-prosperous enterprises are now shutting down. Britain has already lost a significant share of the manufacturing capacity that once formed the bedrock of its economy and national security, and the decline continues.
That does not mean more government is the answer. A laissez-faire approach to workforce policy was a key reason behind the prosperity of Britain’s manufacturing sector as late as the 1990s. Industrial towns created reliable paths into work for young people without the need for state intervention, strengthening communities and keeping regional employment rates across Britain healthy.
It is government policy that keeps getting in the way. A rising minimum wage has pushed businesses to cut back on hiring, while post-1990s legislation has made it easier to unionise, harder to fire staff, and capped working times. This has increased staff costs and has made turnover harder, slowing the jobs market.
An advanced economy can typically rely on productivity gains to offset higher energy prices and wage rates. However, Britain’s dismal productivity growth in recent years, compounded by chronic underinvestment, has made that much harder to achieve—and the scale of recent energy price increases has rendered those traditional offsets inadequate. Even advanced industries such as pharmaceuticals and chemicals are now considering moving abroad. This risks losing jobs and undermining strategic domestic production.
Bringing back manufacturing to Britain is by no means an easy task. But prioritising low energy prices, on-the-job training and less heavyhanded labour regulation would allow sustainable businesses a fighting chance. Only by significantly improving our industrial competitiveness can we have any hope of bringing back Britain’s great industries of the past.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/13/2026 - 06:30Behind the scenes of the Giants’ draft board: outfielder scouting, NIL intel, ‘touch points’
Sebastian Gorka reveals on ‘Pod Force One’ Trump left Vance succession instructions should he be assassinated
‘Breadwinner’ Meghan Markle may be forced to take drastic action to pay her and Prince Harry’s huge bills: ‘Money is tight’
‘Breadwinner’ Meghan Markle may be forced to take drastic action to pay her and Prince Harry’s huge bills: ‘Money is tight’
Trump anti-terrorism chief accuses China of ‘targeted killing of Americans’ with fentanyl — as prez goes to Beijing
Iran threatens to teach US a lesson if it attacks as Trump mulls over his red line to end cease-fire
Ukraine, U.S. Draft Defense Deal To Supercharge America's Kamikaze Drone Production
U.S. and Ukrainian officials have drafted a memorandum that could open a formal channel for Kiev to export battle-tested war technology to the U.S., while also easing the path for U.S. defense firms to form joint ventures with Ukrainian "war unicorns" to mass-produce low-cost, one-way attack drones.
The report comes from CBS News, citing three sources familiar with the matter, who say U.S. State Department officials and Ukraine's Deputy Prime Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Olha Stefanishyna, are working on a new defense deal that would capitalize on innovations forged during the four-year grinding war in Ukraine, such as FPVs, AI kill chains, ground robots, drones, and other low-cost technologies that are now proliferating around the world.
Two weeks ago, we pointed out that it was inevitable that Ukrainian drone and counter-drone technologies would soon be exported to the U.S. We tracked U.S.-based Axon's investment deal flow with Ukrainian firms, which suggested this technology was inbound for the U.S. market. Axon's angle is selling to police forces nationwide.
We also noted that the passive acoustics early-warning counter-drone sector is going to heat up (read here), especially in the era of data centers. There are Ukrainian firms with battle-tested counter-UAS systems that the U.S. badly needs.
Also, last month, we joked that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky went full "Lord of War" and could become the world's top dealer of low-cost drone interceptors.
To our amazement, the U.S.-Iran conflict appears to have accelerated this:
We noted last month:
Ukraine's capital markets have been frozen by war, leaving many of the country's battlefield-proven "war unicorns" starved of traditional funding. However, the Middle East conflict has accelerated a new export pathway, as drone warfare and AI-enabled kill chains reshape how militaries think about defense.
This is exactly what the CBS report said:
Drone collaboration with the U.S., Ukrainian officials told CBS News, would be mutually beneficial, as American financing would help both countries expand their defense production output.
Our view is that a flood of Ukrainian defense firms will transfer battlefield-proven technologies into the U.S. market, tap into deep pools of capital, and leverage underused industrial capacity to scale production of low-cost attack drones and interceptors - this is exactly what the Department of War wants.
This comes as Russia, China, and a growing list of countries race to stockpile drones and interceptors before the next major conflict.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/13/2026 - 05:45Seattle beer garden employee found dead as suspect co-worker claims self-defense
Divorcée accused of blackmailing billionaire Bucks owner Wesley Edens was bailed out by Chinese foreign agent
Brooks Nader narrowly avoids wardrobe malfunction minutes before ‘Baywatch’ reboot red carpet
Brooks Nader narrowly avoids wardrobe malfunction minutes before ‘Baywatch’ reboot red carpet
‘Knight Rider’ car hit with NYC speeding ticket — despite sitting on display inside Illinois museum
Report Exposes Shocking Explosion In EU Sex Crimes
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,
A horror report has laid bare the EU’s staggering rise in sex crimes over the last decade. Sexual violence offences have nearly doubled since 2014, while recorded rapes have surged 150 per cent.
Around 1.9 million sexual offences were logged between 2015 and 2024 alone, with 256,302 occurring in 2024. Between 2015 and 2024, EU authorities recorded 664,293 rapes. The vast majority of victims were women.
The findings, compiled by The Campaign for an Independent Britain, Stand for Our Sovereignty, and think tank Facts4EU, tie directly into the migration crisis that began in 2015 under Angela Merkel.
Horror report lays bare the EU's staggering rise in sex crimes as fears soar over PM opening the floodgates https://t.co/7HmFYG6JCr
— GB News (@GBNEWS) May 11, 2026Critics warn that restoring any form of freedom of movement could import the same wave of violent crime the continent is now battling.
The report’s authors note the sharpest increases coincide with the 2015 migration surge, though they caution that definitions and reporting practices vary by country.
Trends, however, do not lie. Sexual violence offences jumped 94 per cent between 2014 and 2024. Rapes rose 150 per cent in the same period.
This latest report matches what we have already documented. Rape reports in Spain have surged by a whopping 322 per cent over the last decade.
The pattern repeats in Germany, where foreigners are vastly overrepresented in violent crimes and rape cases have risen 72 per cent since 2018.
This data comes as Keir Starmer faces fresh pressure not to fling open Britain’s borders through any EU “reset.”
Starmer’s government lost control of more than 30 councils and around 1,500 councillors last week. Rather than double down on secure borders and British sovereignty, he is eyeing a Brussels reset that could expose the UK to the very crime wave now engulfing the EU.
Britain has struggled with rising sexual offences linked to illegal migration and certain communities, but re-entering EU free-movement schemes would only make the problem worse.
Starmer’s talk of “a new direction for Britain” at the upcoming EU summit has sovereignty campaigners on high alert. After Labour’s heavy local election losses, opponents fear he will trade Brexit red lines for single-market access – and that price could include renewed freedom of movement.
The message from this latest batch of stats is clear. Unchecked migration from cultures that do not share Western values on women’s safety leads to more rapes, more sexual violence, and more shattered lives.
Sovereignty, secure borders, and putting your own citizens first are not optional extras – they are the bare minimum required to protect women and children.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/13/2026 - 05:00