Aggregator

The Knicks' front office may have given Mike Brown the green light.

Kids have been known to complain about silly things — which can make it hard to know what to take seriously. But there are a few symptoms that can signal something serious.

How does the latest Scary Movie measure up to the comedy classics?

Apple's Aura Is Starting To Crack

Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance

Apple isn’t in trouble. The company still generates enormous amounts of cash, the iPhone remains one of the most successful consumer products ever created, and its business continues to grow. If you forced me to choose one ecosystem to live in for the next decade, I’d still probably choose Apple’s. But for the first time in a very long time, the company appears to be showing signs of something investors haven’t had to worry about for years: imperfection.

And in a world where Apple is eventually dethroned as one of the best companies in human history, the fall from grace would start with the smallest of signs. The smallest aberrations. The smallest…imperfections.

What made Apple special over the last two decades wasn’t necessarily its ability to invent products first. It was the company’s uncanny ability to enter markets late and still produce the best version of whatever it was building. The iPod wasn’t the first MP3 player, the iPhone wasn’t the first smartphone, and the Apple Watch wasn’t the first smartwatch. Apple repeatedly demonstrated that it could arrive after everyone else, simplify the experience, and ultimately dominate.

That’s why the company’s recent stumbles are worth paying attention to.

The first is artificial intelligence. In February of 2025, I wrote about a simple interaction I had with Siri while washing dishes. Curious about whether all the hype surrounding AI had finally filtered down into products I actually used, I asked my Apple HomePod a straightforward question: “How many days are in February?” Instead of answering, Siri informed me that it couldn’t help and offered to send web search results to my phone.

So imagine my surprise when I asked Siri how many days were in the month of February, and she retorted: “I’m sorry, I can’t answer that right now. Here are some responses I found on the web. Would you like me to send them to your phone?”

“Are you f**king kidding me?” I thought to myself.

I guess the joke is on me. What a fool I’ve been. I’ve been watching the news about artificial intelligence and commenting on how it relates to the stock market for more than a year now. Yet by prompting my Apple product with just a simple query, it responded as though I was asking for it to mine all the bitcoin in the world in under a second… and make me a turkey and Swiss on white bread with mayo at the same time.

At the time, the interaction felt ridiculous. The entire technology sector was busy explaining how artificial intelligence was about to transform civilization, yet Apple’s digital assistant couldn’t answer a question that most elementary school students know by memory. Looking back, that experience may have been more representative of Apple’s position than I realized.

Over the last two years, competitors like OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Meta have pushed aggressively forward while Apple has struggled to establish itself as a leader in the AI race. Recent reporting from Bloomberg suggests the company itself recognized the severity of the problem. According to the report, senior executives held internal discussions in early 2025 focused specifically on Apple’s AI shortcomings and the company’s growing concern that it had fallen behind. Whether or not one agrees with every detail of the reporting, the broader point remains difficult to ignore: Apple found itself reacting to a technological shift rather than driving it.

The second warning sign was Vision Pro. From the moment the headset was unveiled, I was skeptical…not because the technology wasn’t impressive, but because I couldn’t envision a realistic use case that would cause normal people to wear it regularly. Apple’s greatest successes have always integrated seamlessly into existing human behavior. The iPhone, AirPods, and Apple Watch all solved obvious problems and fit naturally into daily life. Vision Pro felt different. It felt like extraordinary engineering searching for a compelling consumer need. And it looked…f**king ridiculous.

The market’s response seems to have validated those concerns. Even supporters of the product generally describe it as a technological achievement rather than a commercial success. That’s an important distinction. Apple has historically excelled not just at building advanced products, but at building products people actually want. Vision Pro may ultimately evolve into something, but the first iteration did not look like the next iPhone.

And now, even some of Apple’s smaller decisions feel slightly out of character. The dedicated camera button on newer iPhones is a trivial example, but it’s illustrative. Instead of simplifying the user experience, the feature often seems to complicate it. I find myself accidentally triggering functions I don’t want far more often than I intentionally use the button. The issue isn’t the button itself; it’s what the button represents. Under Steve Jobs and Jony Ive, Apple’s philosophy often revolved around removing friction. More recently, some products feel as though features are being added simply because they can be.

🔥 80% Off If You Subscribe Today. This coupon allows for 80% off of annual subscriptions and results in a 85% savings over paying the monthly rate for a subscription to the blog. You keep the discounted rate for as long as you wish to remain a subscriber.: Get 80% off forever

And now, as Apple prepares for a transition beyond Tim Cook, these questions become even more important.

Cook’s tenure will almost certainly go down as one of the most successful runs in corporate history. When he took over from Steve Jobs in 2011, Apple was worth roughly $350 billion. Today, it is measured in trillions. Under his leadership, the company transformed from a hardware giant into an ecosystem giant, built a services business that generates tens of billions in recurring revenue annually, expanded the wearables category, deepened customer loyalty, and became arguably the most important company in global capital markets.

In many respects, Cook accomplished the impossible. He inherited the most iconic CEO in modern business history and somehow made the company larger, more profitable, and more dominant. But the next CEO, John Ternus, won’t have the luxury of simply extending an existing winning streak.

For the first time in decades, Apple appears to be entering a new era with a few questions hanging over it. The company was late to recognize the significance of generative AI and has spent the last two years playing catch-up. Vision Pro, despite being an impressive technical achievement, failed to become the next great consumer platform many had hoped for.

Even some of Apple’s smaller product decisions increasingly feel evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Like Genmoji, for example. It’s clever, but it strikes me as the kind of novelty you use three times, show your friends once, and then never think about again. And what is that going to do for me when something functional and simple, like dictation while using AirPods, still doesn’t work.

None of these developments are existential. Apple still possesses the strongest ecosystem in consumer technology, a fiercely loyal customer base, and a services business that provides enormous stability and recurring cash flow. The company remains one of the world’s great businesses.

But maintaining dominance is often harder than achieving it in the first place.

The challenge facing Apple’s next leader isn’t fixing a broken company. It’s preserving the company’s king-of-the-hill status at a moment when competitors are moving quickly, artificial intelligence is reshaping the technology landscape, and Apple’s aura of inevitability has started to show the smallest of cracks.

That’s why Apple is worth watching. Not because it’s collapsing, but because the warning signs that precede corporate stagnation are often subtle at first. A missed trend here. A disappointing product launch there. A culture that gradually shifts from setting the agenda to reacting to it.

Apple may very well right the ship and remain the dominant technology company for another generation. Betting against the company has been a losing proposition for most of the last quarter century. But investors should keep an eye on it nonetheless.

Every great company eventually faces the question of whether it can continue defining the future or whether it will begin living off the success of its past. Apple hasn’t jumped the shark. It hasn’t lost its edge. It hasn’t surrendered its crown.

But AI is definitely the future, and Apple isn’t there yet. So, for the first time in a very long time, however, it’s reasonable to wonder if the cracks in Apple’s aura will become permanent down the road.

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions.

As of May 20, 2026 I personally no longer actively trade (read my story here). My investing/saving is done by recurring contributions mostly to sector ETFs and a few select equities, trusted third parties who oversee my accounts, and advisors. Such advisors or funds, through individual equities, options, index funds, mutual funds, ETFs, or other securities, may have positions in, exposure to, or holdings of names mentioned herein that I know nothing about. Basically, via index funds, ETFs and individual equities it is possible I could own, have exposure to, or not own anything at any point. As of the same date, May 20, 2026, in an attempt to lead a healthier lifestyle, I’ve also excluded myself from fantasy sports, sports betting, online and in-person casinos and prediction markets.

And all positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.

The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden Tue, 06/09/2026 - 08:20

Hundreds of shirtless Los Angeles Angels fans are fueling the viral ‘Tarps Off’ movement at Angel Stadium, chanting ‘Sell the Team’ and demanding owner Arte Moreno make a change. Inside the growing fan revolt in Anaheim.

The "Being Charlie" writer filed a petition, requesting the funds he claims he was supposed to be paid from his trust when he turned 30 in 2023.

The "Being Charlie" writer filed a petition, requesting the funds he claims he was supposed to be paid from his trust when he turned 30 in 2023.

Fox Sports is adding some new American faces to this year’s FIFA World Cup broadcast.

Nearly 1,200 people registered to vote at a homeless shelter on Skid Row with 132 beds. 185 people registered at a homeless drop-in center — with no beds at all. That is likely illegal, and it is likely a key to the story of how socialist City Councilmember Nithya Raman overtook Palisades Fire victim Spencer...

"He moved on quickly."

The revelations has prompted US attorney Bill Essayli to say he will investigate the concerns uncovered by The Post and "follow the evidence'' to see if the law has been broken. 

The NBA Finals matchup between the Spurs and Knicks may be the main focus for collective NBA observers. But in the background, teams throughout the league are working toward improving for the 2026-27 season.  Predraft workouts have been taking place for nearly a month ahead of the NBA draft in two weeks — which typically...

From The City Of Angels To The City Of Zombies...

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

The Jungle Drums Speak!

"Love that the crack heads on Skid Row are up on the issues, know the candidates, and are able to Make Their Voices Heard in between hits of meth."

- Peachy Keenan on X

Whaddaya know? Looks like the charismatic Nithya Raman has overtaken maverick candidate Spencer Pratt in the Los Angeles mayoral “jungle” primary because. . . jungle reasons. That is, the denizens of LA’s vast homeless encampments — once known as “hobo jungles” — apparently voted overwhelmingly by mail for the Harvard-credentialed champion of street-junkies in the Silver Lake, Echo Park, Los Feliz, Atwater, and Hollywood neighborhoods (SELAH) she represents on the LA City Council.

LA Mayoral Candidate, Nithya Ramen, Champion of the Down-and-Out

So, it will be a November runoff between the super-duper “progressive” incumbent Karen Bass, and merely super-progressive Ms. Ramen. Better reserve your U-Haul trailer ASAP, as the City of Angels completes its transformation to the City of Zombies. And no complaining, please. This is what you voted for.

By the way, what does “progressive” actually mean these days? Progress towards. . . what? The culminating disintegration of a civil polity? The concerted failure to govern a large, urban organism? Unconditional surrender to the forces of entropy? One might suspect a soupçon of racial animus in the mix, too, something of a middle-finger to this thing called white supremacy we hear so much about. It must be rooted out at all costs, including the cost of a place that a productive population once loved — the very people renting all those U-Hauls, dispersing out into the USA gloaming.

Of course, this “progressive” Democratic Party has transformed itself in a decade or so into an out-and-out racketeering operation, that is, to a criminal enterprise dedicated to the misappropriation of taxpayer money among its rank and file, many of whom are not citizens. The model is not unlike more primitive early versions, such as Boss Tweed’s ring in 19th century New York, or the gang under mayor James Curley, the “Rascal King” of Boston. The system was known as “patronage.” Voters were the party’s patrons, and the patrons were on the payroll. Some had actual party jobs. Some just got free stuff in exchange for their votes. They called it a “machine” because its operations became automatic, self-fulfilling.

There was one big difference, though: these earlier Democratic Party grifters, for all their moneygrubbing shenanigans, were American patriots. They celebrated a country so ostentatiously “free,” so fervently dedicated to upward mobility, that it made room for their garish political corruption. The Democratic machine of Los Angeles today is quite the opposite: It’s a faction that loathes and detests the American system and seeks sedulously to destroy it, even while grabbing as much loot as it can in the process.

Mayor Karen Bass was trained for that mission in Cuba. Beginning at age 19, in 1973, Ms. Bass made eight trips there with the Venceremos Brigade (founded in 1969 by the Lefty-left SDS) to “show solidarity with the Cuban revolution,” which, you might remember, was a straight-up communist revolution. One might infer, then, that Mayor Bass is a straight-up communist, with ambitions to destroy the capitalist city of Los Angeles, so as to replace it with a communist utopia — where all production (if there is any) is owned and controlled by the government, which then dispenses the fruits-of-production to the people, according to their needs, as officers of the government see fit.

In such a system, history shows, the people enjoy no ability to make decisions for themselves about what sort of work to pursue for their own improvement and well-being — what we call economic liberty. That’s all left to the political office-holders, the kommisars, the decision-makers, who tell everybody else what to do (because, you see, they know better). It has not worked too well in practice, as the collapse of Soviet Russia demonstrated, and the imminent collapse now of Cuba, will validate.

This is also exactly what you see in the aftermath of the Los Angeles fires of 2025. There was the fiasco of the fire itself in which everything that could go wrong, did go wrong, in the way of prevention and mitigation. The incompetence of Los Angeles city officials was so total — from the mayor’s absence in Africa, the fire chief’s cluelessness, the empty reservoirs, the broken fire hydrants, etc. — that Pacific Palisades and Altadena across town got completely destroyed. In the eighteen months since, the city’s bureaucracy (with “help” from the state) has made sure that next-to-nothing can be rebuilt. Since a large number of people employed in the movie industry lived in these places, and were left financially ruined, Karen Bass’s government has also neatly helped destroy the city’s signature business. . . a home run for communists!

Marxian economic theory is appealing to those who hate and oppose the natural fact that not all outcomes in human life are equal, who resent with red-hot passion the human tendency to social hierarchy, and work fanatically to defeat it. They never do, of course. In communist revolutions hierarchy always reorganizes itself — only within the party structure itself, while all extra-party human effort is outlawed. In California, as in the other “blue” states and cities, Democratic Party leaders perch in the upper branches of the social hierarchy while they cream-off all available revenue streams.

If you suspect there’s something shady about the California election system, you might be onto to something. President Trump thinks this is the case, and said so pretty forcefully on Sunday in his confab with the argumentative Kirsten Welker of NBC’s Meet the Press show. “There’s no evidence!” Ms. Welker repeated strenuously, of voting irregularity, either in this month’s California jungle primary, or in the 2020 national election. You think? I guess we’ll see about that.

Remember: former president Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela — home of the Smartmatic vote tabulation system — has been in US custody for months.

Do you suppose he might be trying to cut a deal for himself to avoid a very long prison sentence by disclosing what he knows about Smartmatic?

Do you suppose that Mr. Trump might know something about these ongoing negotiations?

Do you wonder if any of that has occurred to Kirsten Welker of Meet the Press?

Tyler Durden Tue, 06/09/2026 - 08:00

The former co-stars were spotted hugging each other on the Madison Square Garden Jumbotron as the New York-based team played the San Antonio Spurs.

The former co-stars were spotted hugging each other on the Madison Square Garden Jumbotron as the New York-based team played the San Antonio Spurs.

A new court petition shows he is fighting to get his trust as his legal bills pile up.

Beijing Readies $297 Billion Data Center Buildout Blitz In Bid To Dominate AI Race

The US and China are locked in a series of races, with AI now sitting at the center of nearly all of them. This is a race not only to build the leading frontier models, but to deploy them across entire economies, unleash physical AI, and convert compute power into productivity, surveillance, military, and industrial advantage ahead of the 2030s. This is the new world we are entering, and it is moving incredibly fast. The current chapter of this story is the data center build-out phase. It will then eventually extend into space.

Goldman has already estimated that US hyperscalers will deploy $800 billion in capex this year alone on AI infrastructure. Across the Pacific, however, the scale of Beijing's data-center buildout had remained relatively opaque until now.

China is preparing to unleash a 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) data-center buildout phase over the next five years, according to a new Bloomberg News report, citing people familiar with the matter, as Beijing and Washington race to ensure their own tech giants are ahead in the frontier model race.  

The report said the National Development and Reform Commission is drafting plans for a network of interconnected data centers to be operated by state firms such as China Mobile and China Telecom.

These data centers are expected to rely heavily on domestic chip suppliers, including Huawei, for at least 80% of core technology. This is a move by Beijing to accelerate the development of its domestic chipmakers by sidelining Nvidia and AMD.

More color about the buildout:

The over-arching plan represents Beijing's most aggressive endeavor yet to lay the foundation for future Chinese AI development.

It recalls the undertakings of years past that marshalled resources to support national champions like Huawei, with the aim of replacing US technology. And it's a key prong of the "Six Networks" program announced earlier this year, covering construction of essential infrastructure spanning water and electricity to computing, one of the people said.

The report sent Chinese data-center stocks higher in the premarket: GDS Holdings rose by 5% and Vnet Group jumped 8%.

The US-China rivalry is extending well beyond the chip space. It should be viewed as a full-blown industrial race, and China's planned data-center buildout shows that Beijing is trying to fuse AI, power infrastructure, domestic chips, and state financing into a single national mobilization strategy.

Given that this is now a full-blown industrial race, Beijing's broader strategy is no longer limited to chips, data centers, and power infrastructure. It also extends into the domain of information.

The Bitcoin Policy Institute has warned of "three vectors of foreign influence," including CCP state media, the Singham network, and foreign-billionaire dark money, behind elements of the anti-AI data center campaign in the US.

If correct, that would suggest China's playbook is not just to accelerate its own AI buildout, but to slow, divide, and politically constrain America's.

Tyler Durden Tue, 06/09/2026 - 07:45

If you want to do something great, you’ll probably have to break a sweat.

President Trump is reportedly pressuring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to maintain a fragile ceasefire with Iran as negotiations over a broader peace deal continue. The White House says talks are moving forward, but the threat of renewed fighting remains. Meanwhile, an upcoming Supreme Court ruling could dramatically reshape how California counts ballots, with major...

A large oak tree now stands in the spot where Shirilla blasted through a stop sign and plowed her 2018 black Toyota Camry into a building at 5:30 a.m. on July 31, 2022 after a night of partying.