Aggregator
Amanda Batula and West Wilson reveal shocking first time they slept together on ‘Summer House’ reunion
Amanda Batula and West Wilson reveal shocking first time they slept together on ‘Summer House’ reunion
One dead, 9 missing as Washington chemical implosion proves worse than previously thought
World Cup 2026: USMNT’s odds took a stunning hit after Tuesday’s roster reveal
Boyfriend of ‘Hell on Wheels’ killer Mackenzie Shirilla sent her a chilling text moments before deadly wreck
Becky Hammon doubles down on polarizing Jalen Brunson Knicks take — but willing to being ‘proven wrong’
Taiwan Defense Chief Contradicts Trump On Enormous Arms Package Moving Forward
Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,
Taiwanese Defense Minister Wellington Koo Li-hsiung said on Monday that he's "cautiously optimistic" that the US will advance a $14 billion arms package for Taiwan after the US Navy secretary said it was on hold due to the war with Iran.
Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao told Congress last week that the US was "doing a pause" on the massive weapons package to "make sure we have the munitions we need for Epic Fury," the code name for the US-Israeli war against Iran.
Taiwanese Defense Minister Wellington Koo Li-hsiung, via Taiwan Defense MinistryCao's comments appeared to contradict President Trump, who suggested the arms package could be used as a "negotiating chip" with China.
During his recent visit to Beijing, Chinese President Xi Jinping issued a stern warning regarding Taiwan, telling the US president that if the issue isn’t handled properly, it could lead to "clashes and conflicts" between the two superpowers.
In December, the Trump administration advanced an $11 billion weapons package for Taiwan, more than was approved for the island during the entire Biden administration.
In response, China launched major military drills around Taiwan that simulated a blockade, and Beijing is expected to do something similar if the $14 billion package moves forward.
Koo told reporters he was optimistic that the US would approve the arms sale because Taiwan had received "no notification" that its policy had changed. Cao also said that the US hadn’t discussed the issue with Taiwan.
"From the Defense Ministry’s standpoint, we continue to maintain communication with the US War Department," Koo said, according to The South China Morning Post.
"The reason we remain cautiously optimistic is because we believe that under unchanged US policy towards Taiwan, the core interest involved here is peace in the Taiwan Strait, and peace in the Taiwan Strait is a core interest of the United States."
Trump on Taiwan:
When you look at the odds, China is a very, very powerful, big country. That’s a very small island.
Think of it; it’s 59 miles away. We’re 9,500 miles away. That’s a little bit of a difficult problem.
If you look at the history, Taiwan was developed because we… pic.twitter.com/O9xAQjKyfa
Taiwan recently approved a $25 billion increase in military spending, intended exclusively for purchasing US weapons, though a US official said the Trump administration was "disappointed" that the amount wasn't higher.
Tyler Durden Tue, 05/26/2026 - 21:45New UFO videos solicit baffled explanations ranging from angels and demons to jetpacks and balloons
West Wilson sets record straight on Amanda Batula romance overlap with ‘girlfriend’ on ‘Summer House’ Season 10 reunion
West Wilson sets record straight on Amanda Batula romance overlap with ‘girlfriend’ on ‘Summer House’ Season 10 reunion
Mauricio Pochettino declines to address Tanner Tessmann’s stunning USMNT World Cup roster snub
Father and toddler son airlifted from snowy California trail as authorities sound alarm over forecast
Wyndham Clark’s girlfriend celebrates his PGA Tour win: ‘Everything, hallelujah’
Oklo Lands DOE Plutonium Deal To Turn Surplus Material Into Bridge Fuel
Oklo just secured a direct path to turn Cold War-era plutonium into fuel for its advanced reactors.
The Department of Energy selected Oklo for advanced negotiations under the Surplus Plutonium Utilization Program, one of five companies chosen to convert existing stockpiles into usable fuel under strict security and safeguards rules. The move gives Oklo a practical bridge while domestic enrichment capacity scales.
Work with radioactive materials at a plutonium facility at the at Los Alamos National Laboratory in 1978.CreditThe Santa Clara company is partnering with European advanced reactor developer newcleo on the effort. Oklo would lead U.S. utilization of the surplus material while newcleo would supply fuel expertise and potential project capital, subject to final agreements and U.S. security approvals.
The two firms already announced a strategic partnership last October that includes up to $2 billion in investment through a newcleo-affiliated vehicle for advanced fuel fabrication infrastructure in the United States. newcleo has since begun pre-application talks with the NRC for both a fuel facility and its lead-cooled fast reactor design.
“Fuel supply constraints are a key throttle to advanced reactor development,” Oklo CEO Jacob DeWitte said in the announcement. The program converts material previously destined for disposal into electricity-generating fuel through fission.
This development builds directly on our prior coverage of Oklo’s plutonium work, including the announcement on the Oklo, NVIDIA, and Los Alamos collaboration exploring plutonium-powered AI applications. It also aligns with our earlier coverage on legislation that's been proposed for expanding the ability for reactor developers to deploy their technology on federal land, which also included language for repurposing additional surplus plutonium for reactor fuel purposes.
The selection will almost certainly draw opposition from Democrats and environmental groups who have long resisted any use of plutonium in civilian power generation.
The stance grows more absurd as the same politicians push aggressive decarbonization targets. Past resistance to recycled nuclear fuel programs and surplus plutonium disposition efforts has repeatedly prioritized symbolic concerns over engineering reality, even as the material already exists and must be secured regardless.
Tyler Durden Tue, 05/26/2026 - 21:20