Aggregator
Bessent Examining Use Of Frozen Iranian Assets To Help Gulf Countries Rebuild
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is reportedly pursuing a pathway to repurpose Iranian assets to compensate Amerca's Gulf allies which have suffered significant damage due to Iran's attacks in the wake of Trump's Operation Epic Fury.
Over eighty oil, gas, and vital infrastructure facilities across the Gulf have been hit - with most of the attacks having occurred in March and April - with one recent report estimating up to $58 billion in damage. Iran has sought to justify these attacks as 'retaliation' for these Gulf countries hosting American bases during the US unprovoked assault on the Islamic Republic.
Image source: White House"Treasury will utilize all tools available to allow Iranian assets to be made available to our Gulf allies to support rebuilding and repairs for any future damage caused by Iran," a US official told ABC's Senior White House correspondent Selina Wang over the weekend.
"The Secretary has also directed his team to assess conditions amongst our Gulf allies and request comprehensive estimates of the costs associated with repairing damage Iran has inflicted since the start of the conflict," the source continued.
"Treasury will further consider whether Iranian assets could be used to support repairs for past damages," it added, per the ABC correspondent. She also wrote on X:
The Iranian assets could include frozen assets and ships the U.S. has seized. The administration is reaching out to Gulf allies right now and asking for their evaluation.
If Treasury pulls the trigger on such a plan, it would likely further derail efforts to get Tehran and Washington back to the negotiating table. Already the US has balked at Iran's own insistent it be given reparations for damage done.
Iran is demanding that its billions in funds long frozen by Washington be given back as part of a deal. The Trump administration has so far appeared to reject this.
While some Gulf allies might welcome this, some might see it as unrealistic and a recipe for just prolonging the war. In this scenario, Gulf societies would only suffer more, especially in any future escalation leading to all-out war.
The D.C. think tank Freedom for Defense of Democracies has estimated Iran's damage suffered since the US-Israel war on it was launched at well over $100 billion, and possibly reaching as high as $300 billion - according to the highest-end estimates.
"FDD’s first model-based estimate of Iran's economic losses to date due to Operation Epic Fury are $144 billion, or 40 percent of pre-war GDP," a late April report said.
TOTAL IRAN ECONOMIC DAMAGE ESTIMATE, FDD on April 23...
On this basis, Tehran will pursue its case that it unjustly suffered the greatest damage to its national infrastructure and society, and that the surprise attack was launched as it was seeking to engage in good faith negotiations with the United States, ironically enough.
Tyler Durden Sun, 06/07/2026 - 14:35NBC reporter’s six-word claim about California elections that sparked Trump storming off
Where To Watch The 2026 Tony Awards: Start Time, Channel, Free Tony Awards Live Stream Info
Penn State student, 22, shot and killed while trying to stop phone robbers: ‘It’s abhorrent’
Soloviev Group refinances West 57th Street tower
Alexander Zverev wins French Open for first career grand slam in five-set thriller
One state has the most expensive pizza in the nation — and it’s not New York: survey
Ravenous ‘Frankenfish’ that can walk on land found on Long Island for first time
Stacey King, Bulls champion and broadcaster, dead at 59
Presbyterian Church faces revolt after proposing clergy must be in monogamous relationships — and critics blame white privilege
Switzerland National Team releases shocking graphic for California soccer facility
High kicks: NY gives local World Cup fans tips on how to land safe, legal cannabis
Famous dumpling spot axes signature dish, sparking panic and petition: ‘My family is distraught’
Is ‘Euphoria; Airing a New Episode This Week? ‘Euphoria’ Season 4 Info
Kyle Cooke ‘hooking up’ with ‘Southern Charm’ star amid Amanda Batula split: report
Kyle Cooke ‘hooking up’ with ‘Southern Charm’ star amid Amanda Batula split: report
Data continues to confirm Manhattan’s strong office leasing market
Choose One: Housing Is Shelter, Or Housing Is Just Another Asset In A Bubble Economy
Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via Of Two Minds,
This will get massive pushback because it's true: either Housing Is Shelter, or Housing Is Just Another Asset in a Bubble Economy - it can't be both. This reality gets pushback because the conversion of housing from shelter into just another asset bubbling higher in a bubble-dependent economy has been so profitable for those inflating the bubble.
The basic pushback goes like this: housing has always been an investment, nothing has changed. This is classic misdirection. This is like saying "stock market options have always been a way to hedge positions" to justify the transition from hedging to extremes of gambling, i.e. zero-day expiration options (ODTE).
Whenever I suggest that housing is being hoarded by the wealthy and corporations as a low-risk asset to park credit-generated capital, I get pushback: no, I'm told, the percentage of housing that's empty most or all of the year owned by the wealthy and corporations is tiny, as is the percentage of housing owned as short-term vacation rentals (STVRs).
The problem with these claims is they're based on completely fraudulent / inaccurate statistics. There is no regulatory system that audits whether owners who obtained "owner occupied" mortgages actually live in the dwelling, or whether owners, especially those hidden behind LLCs and other cloaking mechanisms, are "owner occupants" as claimed.
Owner-Occupancy Fraud and Mortgage Performance (Philadelphia Federal Reserve) Occupancy fraud has been suggested as a contributor to the housing bubble. We show it was pervasive and remains present.
In other words, even the most cursory audits find significant percentages of "owner occupied" housing is vacant most or all of the time or is an unregistered short-term vacation rental. Anecdotally, many upper-middle class households own not just vacation / second homes in rural locales but "investment" homes that are empty or they use occasionally in urban areas, which due to high demand / valuations are hoarded because selling them in a bubble economy means the sellers will be unable to buy back into the market in the future.
The "monetize your empty room" AirBnB idea that began the short-term vacation rental market has transmogrified into a monster consuming the housing market in resort locales. Surveys have found that 15% or more of all available housing in resort locales is now absentee-owner short-term vacation rentals, and two-thirds of condominium buyers are out-of-state.
STVRs Have Destroyed America's Resort Towns
Some argue this doesn't matter because resort housing tends to be in rural regions with few jobs. It matters to local residents who are priced out. But "investment" housing isn't limited to resorts; there are an unknown but consequential number of vacant / STVR "investment" housing units in urban areas with jobs and strong demand for permanent housing.
Cities with rent control such as San Francisco and New York have renters who keep their low-cost flat vacant while living abroad. Since the rent-controlled apartment cannot be replaced once it's surrendered, it makes sense to hoard the rental for future or occasional use. Again, there is no system of auditing who actually lives in a dwelling as a permanent resident, as this is viewed in the US as an invasion of privacy.
(In Japan, local authorities keep close tabs on who is actually living in every dwelling as a matter of course. When we stayed in a friend's temporarily vacant flat for a few days, officials came to the door to check on who we were.)
The monetary policies of suppressing interest rates and expanding credit have favored the wealthy who have the income to support additional mortgages and the need to park their expanding capital somewhere. Housing is attractive because it's less volatile than the stock market and offers higher appreciation in a bubble economy than bonds.
Those seeking housing as shelter cannot compete with wealthy households and entities seeking places to park credit-generated capital for income and/or appreciation. In a bubble-dependent economy, there's no need to go through all the trouble of renting an empty dwelling, as the appreciation alone makes the investment worthwhile. Renting out an "investment" incurs risks and costs that are best avoided - unless the property generates a hefty profit as a remotely managed unregistered short-term vacation rental.
Once again, the pushback is pushback against inconvenient truths that threaten the ownership class that has reaped gains from housing as an asset class in a bubble economy. It's now evident that large corporate owners of thousands of rental units have used predatory pricing - oops, I mean dynamic pricing - to jack up rents in markets they are dominant players in; once the price point is set higher, small landlords push up their rents to the new "market price."
In a non-bubble economy, credit is scarce and expensive, and so asset bubbles can't be inflated as credit inflates. As credit inflates, the pool of money sloshing around seeking a low-risk home for safety and appreciation expands, and this pool sloshes into housing, driving home prices and rents out of reach of those whose income is wages, not wages plus capital-generated income.
Bubbles in housing generate artificial scarcity, scarcity not in the total number of dwellings but in the number of dwellings available and within reach for those seeking shelter, i.e. whatever is left after wealthy households and corporations with access to credit snap up housing as a low-risk place to park capital that offers tax benefits and appreciation.
Housing affordability has reached historic lows.
Housing payments have reached historic highs.
The wealthiest 10% have used their income and credit to bid up assets which bubble higher in bubble-dependent economies.
So here's the truth: we can choose housing as shelter or housing as an asset in a bubble economy, but we can't choose both. Housing as an asset in a bubble economy pushes housing out of reach of those seeking shelter.
And of course there's pushback against the truth that ours is a bubble-dependent economy. For a definitive answer, let's see how well the economy is doing after all the credit-asset-speculative bubbles pop and decline back to their starting point.
My book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition). Introduction (free)
Tyler Durden Sun, 06/07/2026 - 13:25