Russia is warning that the Ukrainian capital could face unprecedented aerial bombing, and is taking the somewhat unprecedented step of issuing evacuation orders for bystanders in Kiev.
Russia's Foreign Ministry said Wednesday it warned foreign diplomatic missions to evacuate staff from the Ukrainian capital ahead of a potential large-scale strike if Ukraine attempts to disrupt Russia's May 9 Victory Day commemorations.
via Associated PressSpokeswoman Maria Zakharova, speaking in a video posted on Telegram, called on diplomats to take seriously a Defense Ministry warning issued Monday about retaliation in response to any Ukrainian attack linked to the commemorations and the Red Square parade.
"The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs strongly urges the authorities of your country…to treat this statement with the utmost responsibility and ensure the timely evacuation from the city of Kyiv of the personnel of diplomatic and other representations in connection with the inevitability of a retaliatory strike on Kyiv by Russia’s Armed Forces," Zakharova said.
Zakharova charged that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently made "aggressive and threatening statements" about disrupting the commemorations during Monday remarks at a European Political Community meeting in Armenia.
"Several EU countries were present," she said. "None of them reprimanded the ringleader of the Kyiv regime."
Here's what Zelensky had said:
"It will be the first time in many, many years they cannot afford military equipment and they fear drones may buzz over Red Square. This is telling."
Last year similar back-and-forth threats and rhetoric surrounded the lead-up to Russia's V-day celebrations, but little in the way of direct threats or hostile drone activity over Moscow materialized at the time.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry is urging foreign countries to ensure the evacuation of diplomats from Kyiv.
Russia will strike decision-making centers in Kyiv if Ukraine disrupts the May 9 parade. pic.twitter.com/G7YmNUm3Kf
At the moment, the warring countries have presented competing dates for ceasefire. Putin wants it to correspond with the major Russian holiday: May 8-9, while Zelensky had last week offered May 5-6, which has already come and gone.
Both sides have meanwhile continued attacking the other's vital energy sites, and in some cases this has left significant casualties and destruction.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/06/2026 - 23:00Authored by Michael Clements via The Epoch Times,
Denver is refusing to repeal its 37-year-old ban on certain types of firearms known as “assault weapons.”
Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, sent a demand letter on April 28 to Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and City Attorney Miko Brown, requesting the city repeal the ordinance, which has been in place since 1989.
In a May 4 response letter, Brown stated that the ordinance has withstood legal challenges, kept violent crime low, and was democratically enacted.
Brown wrote that while Denver may consider various strategies to keep citizens safe, “Reversing a common-sense ban that has worked for 37 years and bringing assault weapons back into the City’s neighborhoods is not one of them.”
Johnston reiterated that sentiment in a statement released that same day.
“Denver’s law has stood for 37 years because it works, it saves lives, and it reflects the values of our community. No demand or lawsuit from Washington is going to change that,” Johnston said.
The ordinance—Denver Revised Municipal Code Section 38-121(c)—prohibits carrying, storing, keeping, manufacturing, selling, or possessing an assault weapon.
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston testifies before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Capitol Hill on March 5, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
The ordinance defines an assault weapon as “any semiautomatic pistol or centerfire rifle, either of which have a fixed or detachable magazine with a capacity of more than fifteen (15) rounds, and any semiautomatic shotgun with a folding stock or a magazine capacity of more than six (6) rounds or both.”
The definition includes firearms that have been modified to have these features to function as an assault weapon.
Dhillon wrote that the U.S. Supreme Court held in D.C. v. Heller that the Second Amendment secures “the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms for self-defense.”
She goes on to state that arms in common use may not be categorically banned.
Dhillon stated that the definition includes AR-15-style rifles, which are owned by “literally tens of millions” of people.
“The city has banned an arm in common use for lawful purposes by law-abiding citizens. Therefore, the Ordinance violates the Second Amendment,” Dhillon’s letter states.
Dhillon set a deadline of May 5 for the city to enter negotiations to repeal the ban. To avoid a lawsuit, the city would have to cease enforcing the ordinance, acknowledge the law is unconstitutional, and enter a consent decree to prevent enforcement of the ordinance.
“This ordinance has helped keep Denver safe for decades. Repealing it would put my officers and our residents at greater risk and violate our duty to protect and serve,” Denver Police Chief Ron Thomas was quoted as saying.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/06/2026 - 22:35