Aggregator
Six key takeaways from election night in Indiana, Ohio and Michigan
Welfare fraud has blue states rushing — to shield the fraudsters
Unsettling ADL report show antisemitic assaults against surging
North Korea revises constitution to drop references to unification of Korean Peninsula, names Kim head of nuclear forces
South Carolina inmate who believes he is immortal cannot be executed due to mental illness, judge rules
Carbon Neutral, Speech Negative: Amsterdam Bans Ads Featuring Meat & Fossil Fuels
Authored by Jonathan Turley,
In “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I write about how censorship often becomes an insatiable appetite once countries go down the road of speech regulation. There is no better example than the Dutch and their recent ban on public ads for meat and fossil fuels. Activists have imposed similar limitations on advertising for products in the United States, from alcohol to tobacco. However, the Dutch law reflects how this tendency can metastasize into shielding citizens from unhealthy choices or influences.
It appears that Dutch painters such as Pieter Aertsen (with his work A Meat Stall with the Holy Family Giving Alms, above) were promoting harmful imagery in their work. As for Rembrandt’s “Slaughtered Ox,” the Dutch master is now little more than a climate change denier.
Starting on May 1, the ban on such images became part of Amsterdam’s push to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. While purportedly neutral on carbon, it is manifestly negative on free speech.
As with other anti-free speech measures in Europe, this push again came from the left. The GreenLeft Party’s Anneke Veenhoff explained “I mean, if you want to be leading in climate policies and you rent out your walls to exactly the opposite, then what are you doing?”
The answer is engaging in free speech.
This is, of course, commercial speech, which is often subject to a lower level of protection. However, this shows the danger of using the differential standard to target products or industries viewed as unhealthy or ill-advised for consumers.
In Amsterdam, the ban will cover industries such as airlines, including KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, one of the largest employers and revenue generators in the country.
Notably, activists compare this to cigarette advertising bans, confirming the very slippery slope danger that those companies raised when they were targeted.
Hannah Prins, a paralegal at Advocates for the Future, is quoted as saying, “I don’t think it’s normal to see murdered animals on billboards. So I think it’s very good that that’s going to change.”
Other Dutch cities are now following suit, including Haarlem, Utrecht, and Nijmegen.
Of course, prostitutes still advertise live in Amsterdam and marijuana is a major industry for tourists.
If you want drugs, there are ample choices.
However, if you want a steak, you will have to rely on word-of-mouth directions.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/06/2026 - 05:00David Letterman blasts ‘lying weasels’ CBS as Colbert nears ‘Late Show’ finale
Chipotle CEO tells customers to ‘just ask’ if they want bigger portions after downsizing accusations
Baltimore bakery truck driver believed he was dead moments before he was hit by United Airlines jet
No Kings? In Europe, Monarchs Are Far More Popular Than Politicians
In Europe, monarchs are far more popular than the politicians who govern.
As Visual Capitalist details below, using data from Morning Consult, visualized by The European Correspondent, monarchs hold an approval advantage of nearly 30 points over national leaders. The gap appears in every country analyzed.
The pattern reveals a clear divide: leaders making policy decisions often face public backlash, while ceremonial figures largely avoid it.
Approval Ratings for Elected and Unelected LeadersBelow, we break down approval ratings across eight European countries.
From the UK to Luxembourg, monarchs outperform politicians across the board. Spain stands out with the largest gap, while even the narrowest differences still favor royalty.
Why Do Monarchs Poll Better?One key explanation lies in the fundamentally different roles these figures play. Monarchs are typically nonpartisan, symbolic heads of state, largely removed from day-to-day political decision-making. This helps them avoid the scrutiny and backlash that elected leaders inevitably face.
By contrast, national leaders are directly responsible for policy decisions on issues like inflation, immigration, and public services. These decisions often divide public opinion, dragging down approval ratings.
Spain and the Netherlands: The Biggest GapsSpain has the widest popularity divide, with King Felipe VI outpacing Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez by nearly 40 points. This reflects broader dissatisfaction with political leadership, alongside relatively stable support for the monarchy.
The Netherlands also shows a notable gap, with King Willem-Alexander maintaining a significant lead despite historically low approval ratings for the monarchy itself. This highlights how unpopular political leadership can become by comparison.
Even Lower-Rated Monarchs Still LeadEven in countries where monarchs have more modest approval ratings, such as the UK, their standing still surpasses that of elected leaders. This underscores a broader trend: monarchy as an institution retains a degree of public goodwill that politicians struggle to match.
As this data shows, in modern Europe, it’s often the figureheads, not the decision-makers, who win the popularity contest.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/06/2026 - 04:15Florida brothers shot dead by their sister’s boyfriend after they rushed to apartment to protect her: cops
UK Faces Summer Flight Disruptions As Jet Fuel Risks Mount
-
Ministers are expected to warn Britons that flight cancellations could disrupt summer holiday plans.
-
Allianz Trade research says the UK is especially exposed to jet fuel shortages because of import dependence.
-
Airlines are weighing cancellations, surcharges, and ticket price adjustments as fuel supply risks rise.
Ministers are set to warn the British public that flight cancellations will hit summer holiday plans as new research suggested that the UK is more exposed to jet fuel shortages than other European countries.
Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, is set to tell Brits that there could be flight cancellations this year as she will talk up staycations, according to The Times.
Her warnings will follow a prompt by Sir Keir Starmer that people would have to consider changing “where they go on holiday”.
Trade experts have warned that the supply of kerosene was set to be hit by disruptions across the Strait of Hormuz.
Michael O’Leary, the boss of Ryanair, Europe’s biggest airline, said rivals were “desperately” searching for flights to cancel.
Some airlines have reportedly said that the UK could escape some of the worst effects of jet fuel shortages due to obtaining supplies from other countries.
UK is ‘particularly vulnerable’ to jet fuel shortagesBut research by Allianz Trade found the UK had Europe’s “most structurally exposed markets to jet-fuel shortages”.
It said its heavy reliance on imports, albeit from countries outside of the Middle East, would leave the UK “particularly vulnerable” to supply shocks.
“The UK, Germany, France, and Italy show the largest shortfalls, underscoring their reliance on external supply to meet aviation demand,” trade experts said.
“European aviation activity is indirectly exposed not only to global oil price dynamics but also to geopolitical and logistical risks along key supply routes, reinforcing the region’s dependence on external refining hubs for a fuel that is essential to long-haul connectivity.”
The worst effects of flight disruption could come in late June and July, near the peak of summer travel.
Ministers may be looking to discourage Britons from taking long-haul flights in contingency plans being drawn up, according to reports.
Lufthansa Group has announced it will cancel 20,000 flights over the next six months, while Virgin Atlantic added a fuel surcharge and British Airways has warned of “pricing adjustments” to tickets.
Airlines UK, the trade body, said: “UK airlines continue to operate normally and are not experiencing issues with jet fuel supply.”
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/06/2026 - 03:30'I thought he was going to hit me,' OpenAI co-founder says of Musk
Florida 12-year-old accused of threatening teacher, saying she will ‘shoot up’ school
Dear Abby: My ex-lover wants nothing to do with me as I care for my disabled wife
Russian attacks kill at least 27 before deadline for cease-fire proposed by Ukraine
Moscow Targeted By Over 50 Drones, Country's 2nd Largest Refinery On Fire
We've been documenting that Ukraine has been demonstrating deeper targeting reach inside Russia, as several key oil sites have come under direct drone attack over several days and weeks, resulting in significant destruction.
Just in the last several days, Russian state media has recorded over 50 Ukrainian drone attacks targeting the country's capital of Moscow.
Moscow at night, via MediumMoscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin on Tuesday confirmed that since the start of this month, Ukrainian efforts to target the capital region have greatly increased.
The distance of Moscow from the Ukrainian border is nearly 300 miles, but lately Ukraine has also demonstrated the ability of its long-range drones to target as far away as Perm and the Ural Mountains.
"The defense ministry’s air defense assets have downed yet another UAV. Emergency relief specialists are working at the scene, where the debris from the UAV landed," Mayor Sobyanin stated.
And he detailed, per TASS, that "from May 2 to 5, the capital was attacked by 51 drones. In the current 24-hour period, 19 UAVs have been shot down."
Also, one of Russia's largest refineries came under fresh attack on Tuesday, with Oil Price reviewing the following:
One of Russia's largest oil refineries, the 400,000 barrels-per-day Kirishi refinery southeast of St. Petersburg, was on fire early on Tuesday following drone attacks overnight, Bloomberg reports, citing satellite images from NASA.
According to satellite images taken on Tuesday by NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System, the Kirishi refinery owned by oil producer Surgutneftegas and nearby areas were detected to emit heating anomalies which signal fires.
Alexander Drozdenko, the governor of the Leningrad region where the refinery is located, posted on Telegram early on Tuesday that the fire at the Kirishi industrial zone has been localized, while the Kirishi refinery was the main target of the drone attacks overnight. The post did not confirm a hit on the refinery, only stating that it was targeted.
Initial footage widely circulating of the overnight attack on Kirishi:
The VNIIR-Progress facility in Cheboksary, Russia, was reportedly hit. It produces secure Kometa navigation modules used in Russian drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles.
The Kirishinefteorgsintez (KINEF) refinery in Kirishi, Russia’s Leningrad region, was also struck.… pic.twitter.com/6Jp31QQCWd
Currently, the globe's attention is largely focused on the Iran war and the Hormuz Strait blockade, and with that efforts to reach a political and peace settlement in Ukraine have faded as well. Earlier in the Ukraine war, these major refinery attacks would dominate world headlines, but at the moment they have remained in the background given the constant Iran-related news flow.
President Putin has lately communicated to Trump that he's open to a 'Victory Day' ceasefire, a proposal the Kremlin said Washington has backed. Ukraine is meanwhile offering its own ceasefire, but on a different set of days, and the warring sides haven't reached agreement.
Tyler Durden Wed, 05/06/2026 - 02:45