Zero Rss

Tropic Disturbance Could Threaten Gulf Of America's Critical Refineries

The climatological peak of the Atlantic hurricane season was in mid-September, and so far, the season has been very quiet as El Niño wind shear breaks apart tropical disturbances in the Atlantic Basin.

On Monday morning, the National Hurricane Center gave the tropical disturbance a 70% chance of development over the next seven days, up from 50%.

"A tropical disturbance could threaten states along the Gulf Coast next weekend, bringing the potential for strong winds, inland flooding, storm surge, and tornadoes from Louisiana to Florida. Timing, track, and intensity remain highly uncertain within this projected range," private weather forecasters at BAM Weather wrote on X.

A tropical disturbance could threaten states along the Gulf Coast next weekend, bringing the potential for strong winds, inland flooding, storm surge, and tornadoes from Louisiana to Florida. Timing, track, and intensity remain highly uncertain within this projected range. https://t.co/VY7iLLPrnw

— BAM Weather (@bam_weather) October 4, 2026

The tropical disturbance's projected track points toward the Gulf Coast between Louisiana and Florida.

Notably, Louisiana is a major US fuel-supply and export hub, with about 3 million barrels a day of crude-refining capacity, roughly one-sixth of the national total.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 06:55

"Unprecedented Step": Trump Signs Order To Ease Diesel Costs Amid Global Refining Crisis Trump Signs Executive Order Aimed At Lowering Diesel Prices 

President Trump signed an executive order on Monday evening allowing for the broader use of tax-exempt dyed diesel, otherwise known as off-road diesel, seeking to ease fuel costs ahead of the midterm elections.

"The order temporarily opens highway use of tax-free dyed diesel, deferring the federal diesel tax on that fuel through the end of the year, no interest, no penalties," the White House said.

The statement continued, "With elevated diesel prices and tightened global supply driven by the Russia-Ukraine war and a lack of refining capacity around the world, this is President Trump's affordability agenda in action."

Trump signed the order while on the campaign trail in Nebraska, where elevated fuel costs are squeezing farmers during the fall harvest, calling it an "unprecedented step to bring down costs."

"Today, I am announcing another unprecedented step to bring down costs. For many years, farm vehicles, construction equipment, and other off-road vehicles have used what is known as 'red dye' diesel… which is exactly the same as normal diesel, but is sold tax-free for off-road vehicles and big trucks… Tonight, I am going to sign a historic Executive Order to officially waive the off-road requirement and allow anyone to purchase tax-free red dye diesel for any reason," Trump told the audience.

President Trump signs an executive order removing red dye diesel requirements, a tax-free type of diesel reserved for certain off-roading cars. By lifting the requirements anyone who drives a diesel-powered vehicle can purchase it. https://t.co/T9aCKSmqFd

— CSPAN (@cspan) October 6, 2026

As of Tuesday morning, US retail diesel prices averaged around $6.31 a gallon at the pump, down from September's record of $6.53 but roughly 68% above the $3.76 recorded before the US-Iran conflict began in late February.

Trump Plans To Ease Off-Road Diesel Restrictions Ahead Of Midterms

Bloomberg reported late Monday afternoon that the Trump administration is preparing to loosen restrictions on tax-exempt dyed diesel, seeking to ease costs for the industrial fuel that powers the economy amid a global refining crisis.

The report cites people familiar with the matter, and the new policy could be announced as soon as today.

The plan would allow broader use of dyed diesel, better known as off-road diesel, which is mostly used in farm machinery, construction equipment and other off-road applications. This move would allow for savings of 24 cents per gallon because the fuel is exempt from federal excise tax.

"While the move wouldn't directly lower operational costs for harvesters, tractors, excavators and other off-road equipment that already runs on tax-exempt red diesel, it is seen as potentially cutting the expense to run pickup trucks and other on-road vehicles," the outlet said.

As of Monday, US retail diesel prices averaged around $6.32 a gallon at the pump, down from September's record $6.53 but roughly 68% above the $3.76 recorded before the US-Iran conflict began in late February.

Ukraine's bombardment of Russian refineries and the Gulf crisis have disrupted refining and petroleum-product shipments worldwide.

Last week, President Trump's threat to ban diesel exports to Europe spurred G7 member nations to begin releasing 120 million barrels of diesel over the next six months.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 06:49

Iran Seeking To Increase Range Of Missiles: 'Keep Enemy At Greater Distance'

Just days ago President Trump told a Republican audience at a rally that Iran "is ready to fold up," and again expressing his belief the war will end "right after the election," though he also said "maybe before the election" - in reference to the midterms.

But Tehran on Monday is seeking to reassert its defiance and military readiness in the wake of Trump threats, announcing that the "enemy's next mistake" is going to "bring new fronts and surprises" - according to state media.

Getty Images

One key development being touted relates to the Islamic Republic's missiles. Not only have Iranian officials in the recent past touted that production never stopped even during active bombing campaigns, but now there's a new push to increase the range of projectiles.

Army spokesman Mohammad Akraminia has said in an interview with Fars that technicians are working on fast increasing the range of the country's missiles.

"In this war we concluded that we must definitely upgrade the range of our missiles, and we have now moved in that direction," Akraminia said. This is in order to keep the "enemy located at greater distance."

The furthest distance the Iranians are believed to have targeted in the conflict is the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean. That distance is something like 2,500 miles.

"The missiles that we used during the war, particularly those used by our ground forces to target enemy bases, which were used in Kuwait, and our naval forces also used naval missiles, or sea-launched missiles, sea cruise missiles, against enemy vessels," he said further.

"These were actually very good and effective missiles, and we have now reached the conclusion that we need to increase their speed and range, because the enemy is located at a greater distance from our forces," the Iranian army spokesman continued. "They are located at a distance of up to 1,000 kilometers, and God willing, we will upgrade them as well."

Since the opening months of Operation Epic Fury, it has become clear that US forces were ordered to dismantle Gulf region bases and move away from the reach of Iranian missiles and drones.

While the US has frequently boasted about destroying Iran's navy, there is a Washington consensus that Iran's missile arsenal is by and large intact and operational. Trump reasoned earlier in the conflict that Iran's missiles won't be completely taken away or destroyed:

“I mean, they have to have some, because other people have some. You got to have some,” Trump said. 

“I like some of these guys, but I … don’t think they’re smart. ‘Sir, you shouldn’t let them have any missile,’” the president said of unnamed advisers. “I said, ‘well, what am I going to do? Am I going to let Saudi Arabia have missiles, but they can’t have them?’ ‘Yes, sir.’”  

“Doesn’t work that way, you know, it doesn’t work that way, and missiles aren’t the problem,” he said. “Missiles, they hurt a little location, but they don’t blow up the planet.” 

Iran plans to upgrade all missiles, incl land & naval missiles, to hit targets farther from Iran’s shores. Iran’s Army Spokesman said, “In this war, we came to the conclusion that we definitely need to increase the range of our missiles, and we have now moved in that direction.” He says Iran has done very good work in terms of missile speed and precision-strike capability, and future generations of missiles will possess these capabilities to an even greater extent. He says while the missiles that were used against US bases such as in Kuwait or against US assets in the sea were very good and effective, they have now concluded that Iran needs to increase their speed and range, because today the enemy is positioned farther away from Iran’s shores, at distances of up to 1,000 kilometers.

— Arya Yadegaar (@AryJeayBackup) October 4, 2026

For the US military, hunting down all storage and deployment locations would likely be a nearly impossible task - given both the huge size of Iran and the fact that the bulk of the arsenal lies in underground 'missile cities'. Any kind of total dismantling of the program would require heavy ground forces - something which the White House has thus far shown a strong aversion to.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 05:45

UK Universities Declare The Term Ethnic Minority Is Offensive

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Universities have decided the phrase "ethnic minority" is now an offence. The approved substitutes are "racialised minority" and "global majority." The delivery system for this newspeak is a compulsory lecture for students.

GB News hosted a short debate Saturday night over the phrases British university students are being told to drop, with one commentator noting "This ideology constantly cannibalises itself."

Yesterday's respectful term is today's banned one. Messages sent out by some colleges over the topic refused to encourage debate, but rather demanded a "collective and unified response."

'This ideology constantly cannibalises itself.'

Emma Trimble and Mathew Hulbert go head-to-head over phrases British university students are being asked to stop using, such as replacing 'ethnic minority' with 'racialised minority' or 'global majority'. pic.twitter.com/LVt0B4eLwB

— GB News (@GBNEWS) October 3, 2026

The University of the West of England tells students that "global majority" is "a collective term that refers to people who are black, Asian, brown, mixed heritage, indigenous to the Global South and/or are not racialised as white," and that using it "moves the focus away from Europe and whiteness."

The University of Bristol now addresses "Asian, Black and other racialised minority students." The phrase the students are being told to retire is the one that simply describes a demographic fact in Britain. The replacement describes a political theory.

As we highlighted earlier this week, the Green Party produced its own "Inclusive Terminology Guidance" ahead of its conference. Members are encouraged to use "global majority," described as "an umbrella term for people of Black, Asian, Brown, Indigenous and Latin American heritage" which "reflects the fact that these groups make up the majority of the world's population, but are often minoritised in countries such as the UK."

"Brown" should be "used with caution." "Racially minoritised" is preferred because it "emphasises that minority status is created by social and power structures, rather than being inherent." Using the wrong words, the party warns, "can create environments that feel unwelcoming or exclusionary." The Express reported that failing the word test can be treated as a breach of the party's code on bullying and harassment.

The term was brought to prominence by the educator Rosemary Campbell-Stephens, who has defined it as covering people who are "black, Asian, brown, dual-heritage, indigenous to the global south, and or have been racialised as 'ethnic minorities,'" said to represent about 80 per cent of the world's population. In a 2024 article she co-wrote, the argument was put without much decoration: "Historically, it has been white people, specifically white men, who have held the power to categorize people in relation to themselves." The proposed correction is to stop calling minorities minorities.

The people being renamed have not signed up. A YouGov study of ethnic minority Britons, published in May 2025, found that only 34 per cent had ever heard of "global majority," and just 7 per cent had ever used it. Only 27 per cent called it an acceptable term for the non-white population of Britain. Twenty-three per cent called it unacceptable, and half were unsure.

By contrast, 66 per cent said "ethnic minorities" was acceptable, 49 per cent said the same of "BAME," and 42 per cent of "people of colour." Asked which term they preferred, 35 per cent chose "ethnic minorities." Nine per cent chose "global majority."

So the phrase universities are retiring is the one a clear majority of the people it describes will accept. The phrase they are being taught is the one almost none of them use. That is the cannibalism. The category is redefined, the old word is declared harmful, and dissent from the new word is itself recast as a micro-inequity.

As we also noted this week, one of Cambridge's oldest colleges has decided free speech itself should be "restricted," and inclusivity training is now mandatory.

Gonville and Caius College told its undergraduates the attendance requirement in writing. An email from the education and tutorial office, seen by The Spectator, states: "attendance by undergraduate students is mandatory. It is important for the community as a whole to ensure a collective and unified response." The 90-minute sessions, run by activist 'charity' Stop Hate UK, cover "demonstrating inclusive behaviours" and "recognition of a hate incident and its impact."

Stop Hate UK has published a video demanding that university students must always display "positive attitudes" and "use respectful and kind language that will not cause harm or offence." Its syllabus for educational settings tells students that their right to free speech should be "restricted by other duties, responsibilities, and legislative and contractual obligations," and teaches them how "opinions, attitudes and prejudice are influenced and shaped by unconscious bias, media bias, fake news, etc."

Andrew Gilligan, writing in The Spectator, asked the question the college has not answered: "How will students be required to 'demonstrate' that their behaviour is 'inclusive?'" The charity's own glossary supplies the working definition. It speaks of "microaggressions" and "micro-inequities," including "unintentional comments" and "unconscious messages" that "devalue and discourage people... conveyed through facial expressions, gestures, tone of voice, choice of words." Hate incidents, it says, can include "abusive gestures" or "malicious complaints about parking."

A parking complaint. A look on a face. A tone of voice. That is the standard Caius has hired in, then made compulsory, at a university that still markets itself as a place of free enquiry. The college is not hosting a debate about speech. It is declaring, through the trainer it chose, that speech should be restricted.

A university that cannot trust its students with the words "ethnic minority" is not protecting anyone. It is training them to treat ordinary speech as a conduct offence, then calling the compulsive training inclusion.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 05:00

Houthis Unleash Large Missile, Drone Barrage On Saudi Arabia, Target Riyadh Airport & Aramco Facility Summary

• Saudi-backed forces launch major counteroffensive with roughly 100 Saudi fighter jets supporting attacks along the Red Sea coast.

• Mocha's status remains disputed: Government forces claim to have retaken the strategic port, while Houthis deny the loss.

• Houthis announce major missile & drone attack on Saudi territory, including against international airport in Riyadh.

• Houthi fighters reportedly seize homes of senior government figures, including Parliament Speaker Sultan al-Barakani's mansion.

• Bab el-Mandeb is increasingly at risk, raising concerns for Red Sea shipping and the wider Suez trade route.

//--> Pakistan military action against Yemen by October 31, 2026?
Yes 29% · No 91%
View full market & trade on Polymarket Houthis Launch Missiles/Drones On Saudi Territory

The Houthis have announced in the late evening (local) their forces have launched a large missile and drone attack on Saudi Arabia's territory. The group has announced it again targeted King Khalid Airport in Riyadh as well as the Aramco refinery in Rabigh.

Air traffic halted at Riyadh airport due to a Houthi attack, via Sabereen

An official statement also listed that Abha Airport, Khamis Mushait Airbase and sites in Najran and Jazan provinces in Saudi Arabia were targeted in the missile and drone wave.

On the other side, the Saudi coalition says it is engaged in operations across Yemen's Hodeidah ⁠governorate. It has some 100 warplanes for the operation, prior Monday statements indicated.

Monday witnessed Saudi coalition air strikes on Kamaran Island and al-Salif District in Hodeidah governorate, according to Al Jazeera.

Saudi Coalition Fighting to Retake Mocha, Bab al-Mandab Strait Region

Yemeni Saudi-backed forces have announced the takeover Mocha city, west of Taiz province, according to government-affiliated Saba news. While as yet unconfirmed, this would be a significant reversal as the Saudi-coalition seeks to regain the Red Sea coast, with air support from some 100 Saudi coalition warplanes operating overhead.

Coalition spokesman Maj. Gen. Turki Al-Maliki said 324 “high-value targets” had been destroyed since the operation began. “100 fighter jets participated at dawn today in Operation Dawn of Yemen,” Al-Maliki said in posts on X, adding that the coalition was providing round-the-clock air support to Yemeni armed forces on the ground.

"Saba quoted a responsible military source as saying that the joint forces engaged in clashes in a number of locations surrounding Mocha, during which various types of weapons were used, and which, according to the source, resulted in deaths and injuries among the Houthis, the capture of a number of their members and the escape of others," a regional source writes.

On Monday reports are emerging that the Houthis may have lost Mocha, in what would be a hugely symbolic setback if accurate:

Houthis just lost Mocha

— Zineb Riboua (@zriboua) October 5, 2026

However, some prominent regional watchers are disputing this:

The reports circulating on Saudi-affiliated channels about their forces controlling Mocha and Bab al-Mandab are false and baseless. This video is currently live from the city of Mocha. https://t.co/6C0POZWjQM

— ابراهيم ناجي Ibrahim Naji (@Ibrahym22Nagi) October 5, 2026

Meanwhile a US Embassy alert for Americans in Saudi Arabia...

“Due to the ongoing security situation in Saudi Arabia and the potential for aerial drone or missile attacks on Saudi Arabia, the US Mission strongly encourages all US citizens to remain vigilant and follow the guidance of national alerts released by Saudi Arabia’s Civil Defense,” it posted on X.

Mansion Seized: Saudi-backed speaker of the Yemeni House of Representatives

Iran-aligned Houthi forces have seized the home of Yemen's parliament speaker, Sultan al-Barakani, during a lightning advance south of Taiz that has also cut one of the government's most important remaining supply routes, according to reports. 

Multiple Yemeni and regional outlets reported Sunday that Houthi fighters entered al-Barakani's residence in Wadi al-Barakani, south of Taiz, and established positions inside. Al-Araby Al-Jadeed reported the seizure citing field sources, while Al-Ain placed the property in the Al-Ma'afer district and said the Houthis occupied it following heavy fighting with Yemeni forces and local residents. China's Xinhua subsequently quoted a Yemeni government official confirming that Houthi forces had captured the al-Barakani area containing the parliament speaker's house.

Aden Al-Ghad later published video which it said showed Houthi fighters entering the property. Footage circulated by the open-source researcher @war_noir shows armed men moving through a large reception hall lined with seating, then cuts to the white compound on the hillside.

#Yemen 🇾🇪: Ansar Allah (#Houthis) captured mansion of the Sultan Al-Barakani; Saudi-backed speaker of the Yemeni House of Representatives.

The Ansar Allah members who raided Al-Barakani's house appear to be armed with rather common Chinese Type 56-1 assault rifles.

— War Noir (@war_noir) October 4, 2026

Al-Barakani has served as speaker of the internationally recognized Yemeni parliament since 2019 and remains one of the most prominent political figures aligned with the anti-Houthi camp - so images of Houthi fighters inside his residence therefore make for obvious propaganda.

Taiz's Lifeline Is Cut

The Houthis' advance through southern Taiz governorate has severed the critical road network connecting Taiz with Aden, the temporary capital of Yemen's internationally recognized government.

The Critical Threats Project and Institute for the Study of War assessed Sunday that Houthi forces advanced through al-Safiyah and al-Mansora before capturing the strategically vital town of al-Turbah, citing geolocated imagery as well as Yemeni sources.

Al-Turbah sits at the junction of the two main roads connecting government front-line positions around Taiz with Aden.

CTP/ISW warned that Houthi control there will likely "severely constrain" the government's ability to reinforce and resupply forces across Taiz governorate.

Looks like the Houthis are now using fiber optic drones https://t.co/ZAjqwFnC4b

— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) October 5, 2026

Control of the roads south of Taiz could also deny government troops an obvious escape route if the Houthis continue closing the ring around the city.

The Houthis had already demonstrated that they did not need to physically occupy every junction to cripple the route. Earlier attacks damaged sections of the Taiz-Aden ground line of communication, forcing government forces onto increasingly limited alternatives. Fighting on the Taiz axis was already underway in the days before the house seizure: government troops firing on Houthi positions, and Houthi fighters claiming Jabal al-Habashi.

#Yemen 🇾🇪: A member of the PLC Forces opening fire against Ansar Allah fighters during the recent clashes on #Taiz Axis.

The PLC member is notably using a Belgian FN Minimi TR light machine gun — it was very likely obtained from UAE / Saudi-led Coalition stocks.

— War Noir (@war_noir) October 3, 2026

#Yemen 🇾🇪: Ansar Allah (#Houthis) reportedly captured Jabal Al-Habashi from PLC Forces on #Taiz Axis.

Ansar Allah members is operating at least one technical that appears to be armed with a possible KPV / ZPU 14.5x114mm heavy machine gun.

— War Noir (@war_noir) October 3, 2026 The Front Has Been Moving For Weeks

On September 10, we reported that the Houthis had seized the strategic port of Mocha as government forces abandoned positions along Yemen's western coast, dramatically increasing Houthi leverage over the Bab el-Mandeb shipping chokepoint.

The following days brought additional Houthi gains around the Red Sea coast and Bab el-Mandeb, while Saudi-backed formations struggled to stabilize the front. As we also noted, the group was accumulating actual coastal territory overlooking one of the most important maritime passages on the planet. By late September, the crisis had become serious enough that Yemen's Saudi-backed leadership was publicly calling for broader mobilization.

On Monday reports are emerging that the Houthis may have lost Mocha, in what would be a hugely symbolic setback if accurate:

Houthis just lost Mocha

— Zineb Riboua (@zriboua) October 5, 2026

As we reported Saturday, Saudi Arabia and Yemeni government forces were preparing a force potentially exceeding 100,000 troops for a major counteroffensive aimed at retaking the Red Sea coast and securing Bab el-Mandeb.

Saudi officials had again sought direct American military involvement, according to reporting cited at the time, but Washington declined to provide the airstrikes Riyadh requested as cover for the ground campaign, while leaving open intelligence and other support.

On Sunday, Presidential Leadership Council chairman Rashad al-Alimi declared that the government was moving from preparation to action. We covered his announcement Sunday as he ordered military operations intended to retake Houthi-held territory across Yemen.

The Counterattack Has Begun

Reuters reported that Saudi-backed Yemeni forces, supported by Saudi air power, had attacked Houthi positions around the Dhubab district overlooking Bab el-Mandeb and claimed to have seized several key positions, including the Dhubab airstrip.

The Houthis disputed the government's claims, and fighting remained underway. Later Monday, Information Minister Moammar al-Eryani claimed government forces had secured "effective control" of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which the Houthis called false, even as a government source said fighting continued at a military base near the strait. Video from the coast showed an Al Arabiya correspondent with government forces coming under what the outlet described as a Houthi ballistic-missile attack near the strait.

🇾🇪🇸🇦 | Un correspondant d’Al-Arabiya s’apprêtait à passer à l’antenne lorsque les Houthis ont lancé des missiles balistiques contre les forces du PLC avec lesquelles le journaliste est présent, près de Bab el-Mandeb.

— Arab Intelligence (@Arab_Intel) October 5, 2026

Reuters described Taiz as increasingly encircled as Houthi forces pushed toward al-Mawasit even while government troops launched their coastal counterattack.

The Associated Press likewise reported Monday that the Saudi-led coalition had intensified its air campaign as government forces began a major offensive along the Red Sea coast following the Houthis' latest territorial gains. The coalition said 100 fighter jets were backing the government's forces.

And Now The President's Residence?

On Monday, Xinhua cited Yemeni sources saying Houthi forces had entered the al-Aloum area of al-Mawasit district, where the family home of Presidential Leadership Council chairman Rashad al-Alimi is located.

Houthi-aligned media went further, claiming the residence itself had fallen. Video posted Monday shows fighters posing, praying, and celebrating outside a large multi-story building, with a Yemeni flag raised on the roof. @war_noir and Yemeni accounts identified the site as al-Alimi's family house.

#Yemen / #SaudiArabia 🇾🇪🇸🇦: Ansar Allah (#Houthis) captured the house of the Saudi-backed “Rashad Al-Alimi” — President of the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) !

Ansar Allah fighters appear to be armed with AK-103 pattern assault rifles and common Chinese Type 56-1 rifles.

— War Noir (@war_noir) October 5, 2026

الحوثيين من أمام منزل الرئيس رشاد العليمي ومسقط رأسه في تعز.

— د.بن سعيد | Bin Saeed (@Bin_S_aeed) October 5, 2026

Reuters has not verified the reported seizure of al-Alimi's home, though UAE-based Erem News, citing local sources, reported Monday that Houthi fighters took the house, where his relatives live, without resistance.

Beyond Yemen

Yemen's war - comparatively frozen since the UN-brokered truce of 2022 - has suddenly erupted across multiple fronts.

Bab el-Mandeb connects the Red Sea and Suez route with the Indian Ocean. The Houthis have already demonstrated the ability to threaten commercial shipping using missiles, drones and unmanned vessels; territorial control around the chokepoint adds an entirely different dimension to that threat.

As we have has been documenting for months now, the Red Sea has also become increasingly important to Saudi energy exports as turmoil elsewhere in the region places pressure on alternative routes.

    OCTOBER ONLY.$10 OFFYOUR NEXT ORDER.$30 min. Ends Oct 31. One per customer.GET MY $10 OFF →Signs you up for ZeroHedge Store emails. Can't be combined. Every order helps support ZeroHedge. Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 03:40

Why Might Putin Finally Decide To Bring Ukraine To Its Knees After Nearly Five Years

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Regardless of why Putin might have held off on this for so long, he's now arguably motivated at least in part by the tantalizing possibility of reaching big-ticket resource deals with the US after the conflict ends, the details of which his and Trump's envoys have been negotiating for over a year already.

The New York Times cited allegedly intercepted Russian communications to report that Russia plans to obliterate Ukraine's power, heating, and water systems this winter. While their claim can't be confirmed, it aligns with Putin mildly "escalating to de-escalate" over the summer in response to Zelensky's strike campaign, which has taken the form of ramping up attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure. If the report is true, then Russia doesn't just aim to sever Ukraine's military logistics, but to bring Ukraine to its knees.

Putin has thus far eschewed this arguably due to his belief that Russians and Ukrainians are kindred people. Some have suggested that Russia might not have had the drone and/or missile capacity to do so earlier, however, whether due to low production till now and/or to hedge against the scenario of a hot war with NATO. In any case, Putin now seems to have made peace with the humanitarian consequences of ending the war on Russia's terms sooner rather than later, or at least on as many of them as possible.

He might be motivated by more than just Ukraine's "war of attrition" against Russia that began over the summer with American backing and interestingly enough France's as well. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly told his Russian counterpart over the summer that no business deals are possible so long as the conflict continues. Since then, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner met with Putin to discuss such deals among other topics, after which Kirill Dmitriev traveled to the US to follow up on that.

For background, Putin boasted in late February 2025 that American companies "will make a decent profit" from investments in Russia's resource industry, and Trump's Special Envoy to Belarus John Coale recently confirmed that he received approval to pitch a Belarusian-like deal to Putin. It would involve sanctions relief in exchange for the release of "political prisoners". Putin's ally Alexander Lukashenko already agreed to several such deals and is now negotiating a massive potash one with Trump.

Just last week, Lukashenko also proposed a trilateral Belarusian, Russian, and US fertilizer plant deal, but that requires the US lifting its sanctions on Gazprom. Russian officials from Putin on down have called for the West to lift its sanctions on Russia, and while the US might lift some if Putin agrees to a Belarusian-like quid pro quo, the Ukrainian Conflict will first have to end for this to happen at scale. Their resultant resource-centric strategic partnership could then revolutionize the global economic architecture.

The Russian economy has survived the West's unprecedented sanctions onslaught, largely due to the combination of its natural resources and national payment system, but its Economic Development Ministry expects only 0.6% GDP growth this year. United Russia's landslide victory during last month's Duma elections, the first since the large-scale phase of the Ukrainian Conflict began, gives Putin the mandate to do whatever is needed to win the war and deliver more prosperity to his people afterwards.

It's therefore within the realm of possibility, consistent with Russia's policy of demanding the lifting of Western sanctions, that Putin is motivated at least in part to end the conflict on as many of Russia's terms as possible sooner rather than later so as to then reach big-ticket resource deals with the US. This imperative, which could revolutionize the global economic architecture and deliver more prosperity to his people, contextualizes the New York Times' report about him planning to bring Ukraine to its knees.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 03:30

European Utopia Burns: Far-left Riots Spread Like Cancer From France To Belgium

Alternative media reports say social unrest in France has spread to Belgium.

Those X accounts say that far-left groups are mobilizing young people and migrants, while corporate media coverage emphasizes the narrative that overcrowded classrooms, teacher shortages, long school days and deteriorating facilities are to blame for the chaos. 

Whether the unrest reflects the coordinated weaponization of young people or simply parallel local grievances remains unclear at this moment. 

European political news website Remix News published footage earlier on Monday, stating, "Student protests have now spread to Liège in Belgium."

🇧🇪🔴 BREAKING: Student protests have now spread to Liège in Belgium. Rioters were filmed looting and setting fires in the city center. https://t.co/vd2Uc8LuoI

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) October 5, 2026

FIRST FRANCE NOW BELGIUM: RIOTS SPREADING IN EUROPE? 1/ Liège burned a bus shelter on Monday. The timeline people are selling is “France, then Belgium, then the continent.” The timeline that actually happened is duller and more dangerous: French teenagers have been blockading lycées since late September. Walloon pupils walked out over their own decree. On October 5 the Liège march broke. Sixteen administrative arrests by early afternoon. A bus shelter on fire at Place de la République française. Water cannon. Tear gas. A hard core of about thirty throwing paving stones while 300 to 400 watched. That is a riot edge. It is not a regime falling.

— AirVector (@airpower33) October 5, 2026

🔴 🇧🇪 BELGIQUE URGENT Affrontements avec la police au centre de Liège (place Saint-Lambert). Tirs de mortiers et pétards, feux allumés, pompiers repoussés. Situation hors de contrôle. Plusieurs arrestations. À suivre. #Liège #SaintLambert #Blocus #Belgique https://t.co/PP0hosayIv

— Geocrises FR (@geocrises) October 5, 2026

🇧🇪 French high school riots have now reached Belgium’s Liège province Police have cracked down. Dozens of administrative arrests were made over consecutive days after officers found materials in some rioters’ bags that could be used to make Molotov cocktails. https://t.co/BdR3wDlMhy

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) October 5, 2026

🚨ALERTE - Le blocus des lycéens s’intensifie en Liége ( Belgique ). #BlocusLycées https://t.co/oNGZJ9OvDM

— Trmulli🇲🇨 (@Trmullii) October 5, 2026

🔴 FLASH Liège 🇧🇪 — La tension monte en Belgique où les lycéens demanderaient également plus de moyens pour étudier. #BlocusLycées (INFO sudinfolameuseliege) https://t.co/5CqP69VY5O

— FranceUnie 🇫🇷 (@FranceSouvUnie) October 5, 2026

Liège is located in eastern Belgium, about 56 miles east of Brussels, near the borders with the Netherlands and Germany.

French intelligence agencies told a government crisis meeting at the end of last week that radical politicians from the far-left France Unbowed party, known as LFI, had sparked the riots that left hundreds injured and more than 100 high schools severely damaged.

The collision of far-left riots and the European election cycle has bolstered right-wing presidential contender Marine Le Pen, whose Polymarket odds of winning next year's election have surged over the last week.

The right-wing AfD in Germany is gaining political ground as the globalists and their socialist dream of Europe crumbles, and Nomura analysts see the continent "lurching right" over the next 18 months or so of elections. Folks are furious with deindustrialization and unfettered mass migration, which have transformed parts of Europe into third-worldism.

Europe's shift to the right could follow a very similar path to what's happening in South America, with Brazil's latest first-round election giving right-wing Senator Flávio Bolsonaro a clear win against socialist President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The two are now headed to a runoff election later this month.

Europe's major problem is the far-left radicalization of young people. Europeans finally acknowledged this in behind-the-scenes discussions with high-level Trump administration officials this summer. Brussels now faces the question of how to tackle this crisis as far-left radicalization targets younger and younger people.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 02:45

UK Council's "Anti-Islamophobia" Training Tells Staff The Virgin Mary Wore A Hijab

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

North Yorkshire staff who handle anti-terror work were shown a slide stating that "Mother Mary wore a hijab." The line was used to argue that Islam's attitude to women does not conflict with Western values. The same presentation told them "Jesus grew a beard," as Muslim men are instructed to, and that "the hijab was prevalent in the UK only 100 years ago," illustrated with pictures of British shawls that have nothing to do with Islam.

Mary was a Jewish woman in first-century Judea. She lived about six centuries before Islam, and centuries before the hijab as it is understood today. No image of her, or of Jesus, was made for centuries after their lifetimes. Early Christian art first showed Jesus as a beardless youth.

None of that stopped a publicly funded programme from feeding the claim to council staff, and from putting related material in front of police officers, students and civil servants who run the Prevent counter terror program.

?"I am sick to the back teeth of this two tier approach to faith in this country!"

Bishop @BishopDewar rages after a council in North Yorkshire has been told that Mary wore a Hijab@petercardwell pic.twitter.com/iwyvm95JMZ

— Talk (@TalkTV) September 30, 2026

The session was delivered by Abbas Najib, a former police officer and chief executive of Better Communities Bradford, the charity behind Project Unity. The Telegraph reported that the charity has received £490,000 from the National Lottery Community Fund since 2019, including a £35,000 grant to roll the programme out. Najib has said Project Unity has been delivered to more than 2,500 people across West and North Yorkshire.

Najib confirmed the slide to LBC and said the programme stands by it. "Hijab is an Arabic word meaning a covering, and in everyday use it simply means a woman's head covering," he claimed.

He further suggested "Mary is depicted wearing one in Christian art across the centuries, and headscarves were common among women in Britain within living memory. The point of the slide is that covering the head is a shared tradition across faiths and cultures, not something foreign or unique to Islam."

That is a semantic trick dressed up as history. A veil in later Christian art is not a hijab. A headscarf worn by a British woman in 1920 is not Islamic dress. Calling either one a hijab writes a seventh-century religion backwards onto a first-century Jewish woman, then presents the rewrite as proof that criticism of modern Islamic practice is a myth.

The Mary slide was not an isolated flourish. Project Unity material, which has also reportedly been presented to students, police officers and civil servants responsible for Prevent, includes a defence of Sharia.

One slide states: "Sharia is not a foreign threat. It is a moral tradition - like any other - shaped by faith, reason and a commitment to human dignity."

Another says one element of Islamic jurisprudence requires that "children cannot be struck on the face, cannot be marked, and must freely consent to marriage." Pro-Palestinian marches are described in the talks as "protesting genocide."

Written material accompanying the sessions claims women are not oppressed by the stipulations of Islam, and that "Muslims, the immigrant, the brown person" were scapegoated for a flatlining economy, with the blame laid on "the rich."

North Yorkshire Council has tried to put distance between itself and the content. Odette Robson, the council's head of community safety and CCTV, said the session was a guest presentation at the York and North Yorkshire Hate Crime Conference in 2025, a joint event with City of York Council and North Yorkshire Police, and that Najib was not paid.

"Attendees were free to question evidence, test assertions and explore alternative viewpoints," she said, adding "The purpose was to encourage discussion and reflection rather than to promote any particular standpoint."

The councillors who have seen the material are not buying the distinction. Reform group leader Tom Seston said: "A Reform council would scrap all DEI initiatives such as this and put council staff back to work delivering for residents, instead of receiving political lectures from anti-British activists. North Yorkshire Council should ban this activist and his charity from all work with the council."

Independent councillor Michelle Donohue-Moncrieff, a Roman Catholic, said she was "deeply disturbed that taxpayers' money was used to fund political propaganda being fed to council staff members. In particular, the reference to Mary, the Mother of God, wearing a hijab is both inaccurate and unacceptable."

She added: "Mary is not just some random historical figure to be used to justify Islam. These types of references are not intended to explain Islam. They are a Trojan horse designed to diminish Roman Catholicism and Christianity as a whole. North Yorkshire Council should apologise and ensure that training of this nature never happens again."

The same Project Unity material was used at that 2025 hate crime conference in front of North Yorkshire Police officers. Najib played a 2024 clip of Nigel Farage warning that "we have a growing number of young people in this country who do not subscribe to British values, in fact loathe much of what we stand for," and clarifying that he meant Muslims, citing marches over Israel's actions in Palestine. Officers were then shown footage of a man racially abusing a Muslim bus driver and asked to weigh the two.

Najib's question to the room: "Ask yourself, who is going to get into trouble between those two gentlemen? And who did the most harm?" He added the comparison he wanted them to sit with: "Sitting in a national news studio and saying 'Jews hate Britain', he'd be locked up before he left the studio, and too right, too."

The police force has said the talk was not part of its training programme and was not delivered by a police employee. That does not change who was in the room, or what they were asked to conclude: that a politician's words about integration may have done more harm than a racial assault.

Najib's defence of that exercise is the same line he uses for the Mary slide. "Project Unity exists to reduce anti-Muslim hostility and strengthen trust between communities," he said. Participants, he argued, were being asked to apply one standard, and to consider how the same words would land if said about Jewish people or black people.

The standard on offer is not equal treatment under the law. It is a demand that doubts about integration, grooming, Sharia, or the compatibility of political Islam with British institutions be treated as a species of hate.

This is not a rogue workshop in Yorkshire. In March 2026 the government published a non-statutory definition of "anti-Muslim hostility," the rebrand it adopted after dropping "Islamophobia" under free-speech pressure, and promised a special representative to push it into schools, universities and public services.

The working group that shaped the definition was chaired by former attorney general Dominic Grieve. Every member of that panel has links to organisations successive governments have kept at arm's length, including the Muslim Council of Britain and Muslim Engagement and Development.

The definition is not a criminal offence. Ministers have been careful to say so. What it is, in practice, is a script. Project Unity is what that script looks like when it reaches a conference room: Christian history renamed, Sharia redescribed as a moral tradition "like any other," and an elected politician measured against a hate crime. The audience included people whose job is counter-terror work.

The other half of the machine is record-keeping. Officials at the Standards and Compliance Unit, the body set up to handle complaints about Prevent, have been logging social media posts that criticise the programme, including posts that accuse it of fixating on the "far Right" while soft-pedalling Islamist extremism. The database was withheld for more than a year and released only after an appeal to the Information Commissioner. Between March 2024 and February 2025 the unit made 77 such observations, mostly from X.

Jacob Smith of Rights & Security International, whose team forced the release, said: "It is shocking that the government has been trawling X and Reddit to find out who has been critiquing Prevent - and then storing that information. You should be allowed to criticise government policy without being put on a list."

Put the pieces together. A lottery-funded charity tells anti-terror staff that the mother of Christ wore a hijab and that Sharia is not a foreign threat. The same charity asks police to decide whether Nigel Farage's words did more harm than a man abusing a bus driver. A government panel with Islamist-linked members writes the definition those sessions are built to serve. A Home Office-linked unit keeps a list of people who say the counter-extremism programme has its priorities backwards.

None of this required a new blasphemy statute. All it required was grants, a conference slot, a working definition, and a database. The people supposedly paid to protect the public were the ones sat in the room being indoctrinated.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2026 - 02:00

The Five-Year Fuel Crisis: Why The World Economy Is Paying For A War It Thinks Is Ending

Authored by Larry C. Johnson via SonarIntelligence (Sonar21),

Once again Karl W. Miller has put numbers to a problem that most of the commentariat still treats as a temporary price spike. His latest forward outlook, "The Five-Year Global Energy Crisis," dated October 3, makes an argument that should alarm every finance ministry from Berlin to Jakarta. The war's damage to Gulf energy infrastructure is not a disruption that ends when the shooting stops. It is a reconstruction problem measured in years and trillions of dollars, and while it is solved, the world will be short of the fuels that run its economy.

A ceasefire is not a repair crew

Miller's central insight is simple. A ceasefire can reopen a shipping lane overnight. It cannot manufacture a compressor, mobilize commissioning engineers, or pay a contractor. The next phase of this crisis, he writes, is a competition for cash, equipment, qualified contractors and finished fuel.

His cost model is sobering. In his aggressive case, rebuilding the damaged Gulf energy system requires $1.16 trillion in total program funding. Under prolonged stress, with scarce equipment, rising prices and delays, the bill reaches $2.53 trillion. Even his faster case runs to nearly half a trillion dollars. He is careful to say these are model outputs, not contractor quotes, and that the true extent of the damage is the largest unknown. An April assessment put energy-related repair costs at only $34-58 billion. But the direction of his argument doesn't depend on the exact figure. Every month of delay makes the same repair more expensive, because the global market for specialized equipment and crews is already stretched by LNG expansions, refinery maintenance and power projects elsewhere.

The timeline is just as stark. Weighted by cost, the rebuild averages almost five years from today. Only 60% of the work finishes by 2031, and the longest-lead packages run to seven years.

The money problem comes first

The most original part of Miller's analysis is about cash. A damaged refinery may be worth rebuilding and technically repairable, and still sit idle because the government that owns it has to pay for food imports, salaries, electricity and water first. Lost export revenue doesn't stop those bills. When a state borrows to keep paying them, that money can't also pay an engineering contractor.

Iraq shows the problem in practice. In July, it faced a monthly public salary obligation of about $5.96 billion with a funding shortfall of $2.52 billion. A government in that position rebuilds nothing. It pays its people, and the export capacity that would restore its revenue waits. Miller's warning is that this trap can stop reconstruction before it starts: without engineering funds and vendor deposits, factory slots go to other customers and delivery dates slip.

The fuel gap is the global transmission belt

For the rest of the world, the damage arrives through diesel and jet fuel. The figures Miller cites are already severe. Gulf diesel net exports in August were just over a quarter of prewar levels. Combined Gulf and Russian diesel exports were 1.6 million barrels a day below February. Global oil stocks had fallen 507 million barrels since February, and global refinery throughput in August was 4.2 million barrels a day below a year earlier.

Looking forward, Miller's severe case assumes a shortfall of at least 3 million barrels a day of diesel and jet fuel, every year for five years. That's about 1.1 billion barrels a year and 5.5 billion barrels over the period. He is explicit that this is a deliberate stress test, not a forecast, and that a faster-recovery path closes the gap by the fourth year. But the stress case is a plausible one. Restored capacity can be absorbed by refinery outages, deferred maintenance, recovering demand and delivery bottlenecks. Damaged refineries don't come back at full capacity on the first day.

Inventories cannot fill a gap of that size for that long. Five and a half billion barrels is far beyond any country's emergency stocks, which is why drawing down Europe's reserves now, under pressure from Washington, only buys weeks. Without enough new supply, the balance can close in only one way: by using less fuel.

How the shortage reprices everything

The economic damage extends well beyond the missing barrels. When supply falls short, buyers bid for the marginal cargo, and that bid sets the price for all the fuel still being bought. Miller's illustration: a $40-a-barrel premium across 10 million barrels a day of purchases adds $146 billion a year to fuel bills. Applied only to the 3 million missing barrels, it would add $43.8 billion and badly understate the real cost.

Scarcity also reprices credit. At $150 a barrel, a buyer purchasing 1 million barrels a day needs $2.25 billion to hold 15 extra days of inventory, and $3 billion at $200. Longer voyages tie up more fuel and more money in transit. A supplier can have the barrels while its customer can't get a letter of credit. And a cargo that wins a bidding war for one country leaves another short. Competition redistributes the shortage before it eliminates it.

Who absorbs the shock

Diesel carries the crisis into the real economy. It runs road freight, farm machinery, mines, construction fleets and backup generators, none of which can switch fuels quickly. Higher diesel costs pass straight into freight rates and food prices, and when diesel isn't available at any price, activity simply stops. Jet fuel carries the shock into aviation: higher fares, fewer routes and higher air cargo surcharges. Kerosene hits the households with the least room to adjust, in countries where it is still used for heating, cooking and lighting.

Miller's regional assessment follows the money:

• Europe competes for replacement diesel and jet cargoes while running its refineries close to their limits.
• South and Southeast Asia face higher import bills, currency pressure and greater need for trade credit.
• Africa and smaller importers are the most vulnerable. Tenders fail, credit lines run out, and small cargoes become uneconomic long before global stocks are exhausted.
• The United States and other Atlantic suppliers face export demand competing with their own diesel needs, with refineries running so hard they have little tolerance for outages.

The ultimate balancing mechanism is demand destruction: freight deferred, low-margin factories idled, flights cancelled, and poorer importers losing every bidding contest. Miller warns against mistaking that for recovery. Lower consumption caused by rationing through price or credit is not a repaired energy system.

Case study: Europe

Europe shows what Miller's framework looks like in practice. The continent burns about 5 million barrels of diesel a day, fuel for the trucks that move its goods, the tractors that plant its crops and, as winter approaches, the boilers that heat millions of homes.

How much does Europe produce, and how much does it import? Running flat out, EU refineries can produce roughly 4.5 to 5 million barrels a day of diesel and gasoil, and they are already operating close to their maximum. That leaves Europe roughly 85-90% self-sufficient at best. The remaining 10-15% comes from imports, and that margin sets the price for the entire market. Kepler puts the EU's diesel imports from outside the bloc at about 580,000 barrels a day this year. Britain, which lost much of its refining capacity over the past two decades, is far more exposed: it imports more than half the diesel it uses.

The origin of those imports has changed dramatically. Russia was long Europe's largest outside supplier until the EU embargoed Russian diesel in 2023. The Gulf filled much of the gap, until the war cut it off. Since March, the United States has supplied more than half of Europe's diesel imports, and more than two-thirds in August and September. Europe has traded dependence on Moscow for dependence on Washington, and Washington has just shown it is willing to use that leverage, threatening an export ban unless Europe released its emergency stocks.

Europe's diesel depends on imported crude as well. Its refineries run almost entirely on foreign oil: the EU imports about 97% of the crude it consumes. But the Gulf was never Europe's main crude supplier. In 2025, Gulf Cooperation Council states supplied only about 7% of EU crude imports, Iraq another 5.8%. Europe's crude now comes chiefly from the United States, Norway and Kazakhstan, which together supplied nearly half of EU petroleum imports in the second quarter of 2026. The volume has held steady; the bill rose 56%. But the crude isn't the crude Europe's refineries were built for. Much of Europe's refining capacity was designed around medium sour crudes such as Russia's Urals, with conversion units that turn the heavier part of the barrel into diesel. American shale crude is light and sweet. It refines readily into gasoline and naphtha, but it yields proportionally less diesel and jet fuel, the very products Europe is short of. As Miller notes, sour crude isn't uniquely required to make diesel; the replacement barrels work, but not at the same yield or cost. The Gulf supply Europe really lost was finished diesel from Gulf refineries, and that is what the United States has replaced. The result is a double dependence: Washington is now Europe's largest supplier of both the crude its refineries run and the diesel they can't make. Even the non-American barrels carry risk. Most Kazakh crude reaches Europe through a Black Sea terminal at Novorossiysk, on Russian soil, a route that has already been hit by Ukrainian drones.

How long can Europe store diesel? This is where Europe's apparent cushion turns out to be thinner than it looks. Unlike crude oil, which can sit in salt caverns for decades, diesel degrades. Under ideal conditions, conventional ultra-low-sulfur diesel can typically be stored for six to twelve months. With stabilizers, biocides and well-managed tanks, that can be extended to 18 to 24 months. Oxidation forms gums and sediment, water collects, and microbes grow in the fuel.

European diesel has an added problem. The EU standard, EN 590, allows up to 7% biodiesel in road diesel, and biodiesel oxidizes faster than petroleum diesel. Concawe, the European refiners' research association, recommends a maximum storage time of six months for biodiesel and current blends containing it. Strategic stockholders can extend that by holding biodiesel-free product, but even then the reserve has to be rotated, sold into the market and replaced with fresh fuel on a cycle of a year or two.

That changes what Europe's reserve really is. EU countries and Britain held about 52 million tonnes of gasoil and diesel in June, including nearly 38 million tonnes of emergency reserves, roughly two months of consumption. But a diesel reserve is not a stockpile Europe can fill once and forget. It is a stock that must be continually turned over, which means continually bought, and bought in the same tight market Miller describes. Every barrel released now to satisfy Washington has to be replaced later, at a higher price, from suppliers who are already short. And because diesel degrades, Europe can't solve the problem by buying extra while it's cheap and holding it for years. A reserve with a shelf life of a year or two cannot cover a structural deficit that Miller's severe case puts at five years.

The conclusion for Europe is stark. It produces most of its own diesel but has no spare refining capacity. It depends on imports for the margin that sets prices, and those imports now come mostly from a single supplier that has shown it will use them as leverage. And its emergency reserve is both perishable and finite. In Miller's terms, Europe is one of the buyers most exposed to the marginal cargo, and the least able to wait out a five-year shortage.

The implications for the global economy

Put together, Miller's analysis describes a world economy facing a prolonged supply shock, not a temporary one. Fuel costs feed into nearly everything, so central banks fighting the inflation this crisis has already produced will face pressure for longer than they expect. Emerging-market importers face a combination of high fuel bills, weak currencies and tighter credit that has historically produced debt crises and unrest. And the reconstruction itself will absorb capital, equipment and specialist labor that would otherwise build new energy supply elsewhere, so the shortage may delay the investment needed to end it.

Miller's strategic conclusion is the one policymakers least want to hear. Ending the conflict removes one source of disruption. It does not repair the energy system, which requires a separate sequence of financing, engineering, manufacturing, construction and commissioning that will take years. Until that is done, reliable fuel and the cash to buy it will determine which economies absorb the burden. Neither will be distributed evenly.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 23:25

An Uncomfortable Reality: China's Rare Earth Chokehold May Outlast This Decade

An inconvenient reality for the Trump administration's race to rebuild Western conflict-free critical materials supply chains outside China, whether domestically or through friendshoring, is that it won't break China's chokehold this decade.

The main problem for the US lies well beyond the mine, ING analysts Ewa Manthey and Coco Zhang wrote in a note on Monday titled "The US rare earth push: what comes next?" Extracting more ore does very little for US companies that depend on Chinese processing plants to turn ore into usable metals, alloys, and finished magnets.

"The US has significant rare earth resources, but its supply chain remains heavily reliant on China. The biggest gaps do not sit in the mine, but rather in processing, heavy rare earth separation and magnet manufacturing," Manthey said.

China accounts for about 60% of mined magnet rare earths, 91% of refined output and 94% of permanent magnet production, Manthey said, citing the International Energy Agency.

Manthey added, "The US rare earth challenge is industrial rather than geological. Its vulnerability lies in the difficult stages between the mine and the finished component."

MP Materials represents both America's progress in rebuilding domestic rare earth supply chains and its continuing constraints. The miner produced a record 50,692 tons of rare-earth oxide in concentrate in 2025 and began manufacturing neodymium-iron-boron magnets in Texas that December.

The biggest gap is heavy rare earths, particularly dysprosium and terbium, which help magnets retain performance at high temperatures. These materials are critical across automotive, aerospace, and defense applications.

MP Materials is developing a separation line designed to produce about 200 tons of dysprosium and terbium annually. Even with that capacity, securing feedstock remains a challenge because production is concentrated in conflict areas such as China and Myanmar.

Manthey cited a June agreement with USA Rare Earth involving $277 million in grants, a $1.3 billion senior secured loan and a 16% government equity stake. She also highlighted the federal government's investment in MP Materials, alongside decade-long magnet purchase commitments and an NdPr oxide price floor.

The number of announced projects is growing: MP Materials, Vulcan Elements and USA Rare Earth have each outlined plans for facilities capable of producing 10,000 tons of magnets annually. Those targets, however, represent planned capacity rather than current output - and that is a major problem. 

The US is also pursuing supplies from Australia and Brazil while funding recycling technologies. Yet alternative supplies are unlikely to eliminate the China dependency this decade: The IEA estimates that announced magnet projects outside China would meet well below 20% of demand outside China in 2035. 

Last week, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts questioned whether more than $40 billion in announced federal support to rebuild conflict-free critical materials supply chains outside China would translate into reliable near-term supplies and improve defense readiness.

Christian Keller, Barclays' global head of economics research, recently warned that "China's quasi-monopolistic position" in the critical materials space would persist through at least the end of the decade.

Not just in mining...

...but also refining.

Stifel aerospace and defense analyst Jonathan Siegmann wrote last month that "owning the bottlenecks," or investing in producers within conflict-free supply chains, was the best way to gain exposure as China chokes off the West's access to critical materials such as tungsten, magnets, rare earths, and other materials.

News last Friday of the US Commerce Department's move to squeeze jet parts supplies to China in response to Beijing's weaponization of critical material exports indicates that an uncomfortable reality is setting in across the West: Mining and processing supply chains might not be rebuilt in time to meet demand from the massive rearmament supercycle.

Professional subscribers can read the full note here at our Marketdesk.ai portal. 

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 23:00

Trump's $90 Medicare Checks Raise A Question Nobody Seems To Be Asking

Authored by David Manney via PJ Media,

President Donald Trump is sending well over 20 million Medicare enrollees $90 apiece, and plenty of recipients will understandably welcome the money. With the standard Medicare Part B premium at $202.90 a month this year, $90 isn't pocket change for someone living on Social Security.

AP Photo/Heather Khalifa

From the White House:

• Payments will be made from the Medicare Improvement Fund, which has been given $2 billion by Congress for the purposes of making improvements to the Medicare fee-for-service program, but has never before been utilized.
• Most eligible seniors will receive the payment in the form a direct deposit of $90 in early October. Those without direct deposit will receive a check, also sent in early October, to the mailing address they have registered with Medicare.

The interesting question comes before the checks arrive. Congress created something called the Medicare Improvement Fund, and the law describing what the money can be used for doesn't specifically say anything about mailing cash directly to beneficiaries.

The statute gives the secretary of Health and Human Services authority to use the fund to make "improvements" to original Medicare Parts A and B. It then specifically mentions adjustments to payments for medical items and services that doctors, hospitals, and other suppliers provide.

The language is broad enough to give HHS room to argue that helping beneficiaries pay Part B premiums qualifies as an improvement, but direct cash payments aren't specifically identified.

Congress currently has $2.062 billion sitting in the fund. Sending $90 to slightly more than 20 million people will consume roughly $1.8 billion of it. The money ultimately comes from the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance trust funds in proportions determined by the HHS secretary, so this isn't an unused pile of general Treasury cash somebody discovered behind a filing cabinet.

The statute also contains a safeguard worth noticing. HHS may obligate the use of the money only after the secretary determines that sufficient funds exist, and the CMS chief actuary and appropriate budget officer certify that enough money is available to cover the obligations.

Maybe all of that paperwork has been completed. The White House announcement doesn't provide the certifications, an HHS legal analysis, or an explanation of how a direct beneficiary payment fits within the statutory purpose. With nearly $2 billion moving from Medicare trust funds into bank accounts and mailboxes, publishing those documents would answer a reasonable question.

The White House calls the $90 payment a Medicare premium rebate, and says this is the first time any administration has used the Medicare Improvement Fund to directly lower beneficiaries' costs. Most eligible recipients will receive direct deposits in early October, while others will receive checks. People whose premiums are already paid by Medicaid and those paying income-related premium surcharges aren't eligible.

None of this proves the payments are unlawful. Congress wrote an unusually broad phrase when it authorized HHS to "make improvements" to Medicare, and an administration lawyer can make a serious argument that reducing a beneficiary's effective premium cost qualifies.

Still, a novel reading involving almost $2 billion deserves more than a celebratory fact sheet. Show the legal interpretation. Show the actuarial certification. Show Congress and taxpayers exactly how HHS concluded that a fund historically discussed in terms of Medicare services and provider payments can now finance direct checks.

Trump may have found a perfectly lawful use for a fund Washington spent years moving money into and out of without ever spending it. If so, releasing the documents should make the case stronger.

For $90, beneficiaries get a check. For $1.8 billion, taxpayers deserve the paperwork.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 22:35

Former World Chess Champion Kasparov Says US Warned Him About Kremlin Kill Plot

Authored by Chris Summers via The Epoch Times,

Former world chess champion Garry Kasparov has said the security services from both the United States and Lithuania have warned him that his life was in danger, after a Russian plot was discovered which allegedly targeted Kremlin critics living abroad.

Last month the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said five people had been charged with plotting, on behalf of Russian intelligence, to assassinate two opposition figures.

One of the targets was in the United States, and the other in Lithuania.

DOJ did not identify Kasparov - who moved to the United States from Russia in 2013 and lives in New York - but in a Substack post the 63-year-old former chess grandmaster said he had been warned his life was in danger.

He identified the other person as Ivan Tyutrin, the co-founder of the Free Russia Forum, who is based in Lithuania.

"Neither I nor Ivan have been told explicitly that we were the targets whose names are redacted in the indictment of the assassins," Kasparov said.

"We were, however, warned by security services in Lithuania and the United States that our lives were in danger and that we should take precautions, which I did and will continue to do."

The Epoch Times reached out to the Free Russia Forum for comment, but did not receive a response by publication time.

Kasparov - who was born in Baku in what is now Azerbaijan, when it was part of the Soviet Union - became famous when, at the age of 22, he beat Anatoly Karpov to become world chess champion, a title he held until 2000.

Kasparov, an increasingly outspoken critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin, chairs the Renew Democracy Initiative, a nonprofit that describes itself as an "intellectual home for the pro-democracy movement" globally.

In his The Next Move Substack, Kasparov said his friend and fellow opposition figure, Boris Nemtsov, was "murdered in cold blood in front of the Kremlin" in February 2015.

'I Will Not Hide': Kasparov

"But I will not stop, and I will not hide, even if I thought it was possible to do so. I believe that the best defense is a good offense," Kasparov said.

"My family and I will not truly be safe as long as Putin is in power in Russia - a circumstance shared by millions."

The DOJ only referred to the targets of the alleged Russian intelligence plot as Victim-1, who lived in the United States, and Victim-2, who lived in Lithuania.

They said a U.S. national had been offered $40,000 to "eliminate" or "disappear" Victim-1.

A U.S. citizen was also contacted about surveilling and murdering Victim-2, who was allegedly described by the plotters as a "bad guy" who was "telling lies about Russia."

The Kremlin said last month it saw no reason to comment on the U.S. allegations, saying there was an absence of credible evidence and facts.

Russia has previously denied conducting such plots on foreign soil.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 21:45

West Virginia Wants Nuclear's Benefits, Somebody Else Can Handle The Waste

When West Virginia first announced that they had joined the race to host Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses (NLICs), the central bargain was already clear: nuclear investment comes with responsibility for used fuel. 

We’ve covered this concept a couple times now, highlighting states like Texas and New Mexico that back nuclear investment while fighting storage of out-of-state spent fuel.

Now, West Virginia has joined the club of pro-nuclear pretenders.

Governor Patrick Morrisey signed an exploratory agreement with DOE and announced West Virginia's entry as the sixth contender in the first week of September. The governor claimed he and his staff went above and beyond to be considered for an NLIC.

It's not surprising, considering over half the states in the country applied for the program with the knowledge that the campuses could attract up to $50 billion in investment and create nearly 25,000 jobs, each.

The frustrating part is that the expectation to take in used nuclear fuel wasn't some secret buried in the fine print. West Virginia's submitted NLIC proposal made temporary used fuel storage a top priority, alongside research into longer-term disposal. Its September agreement explicitly anticipated addressing out-of-state spent fuel and other radioactive waste.

This all only came to light on September 25th when the Charleston Gazette-Mail reported what the administration had actually proposed, using documents obtained through a public-records request. The sales pitch suddenly had an inconveniently readable paper trail.

Multiple lawmakers, even pro-nuclear Republicans, raised concerns about constituents being blindsided. Delegate Josh Holstein said Boone County's elected representatives had not been informed that the former Hobet mine was among the proposed sites.

By September 27th, Morrisey put out a formal statement declaring a hard flip from his previous posturing: "West Virginia will not be a dumping ground for nuclear waste. Period."

The Gazette got it wrong. This Friday’s story intentionally misrepresented my administration’s energy plans without giving me a chance to address their claims and slanted coverage. Here's the truth: We are pursuing nuclear generation and manufacturing to bring high-paying jobs to West Virginia. Our recent application to the U.S. Department of Energy was part of that effort. We want to build on our existing strengths in coal and natural gas to create more jobs and opportunity, stronger communities, and a higher standard of living. But West Virginia will not be a dumping ground for nuclear waste. Period. I have directed my Office of Energy to ensure that every site identified in our final Nuclear Campus application is considered only for nuclear generation or manufacturing - not as a dump. I will keep fighting for investments that can bring thousands of high-paying jobs to our state. I will also protect West Virginia’s beauty and heritage. We can pursue new opportunities without becoming a dumping ground. More energy jobs and manufacturing jobs are on the table. Nuclear waste dumps are not. We've had enough fake news.

— Governor Patrick Morrisey (@wvgovernor) September 27, 2026

By September 30th, the NLIC hosting deadline, state energy director Nicholas Preservati told DOE West Virginia was "unable to execute the Hosting Agreement and commit fully to its requirements." The letter still surprisingly proclaimed support for a national nuclear renaissance.

It’s just somebody else's responsibility, apparently. As with Texas and New Mexico, the enthusiasm looks considerably thinner once nuclear's less glamorous obligations enter the conversation.

West Virginia has not banned nuclear development, but it has walked away from this attempt to connect the industry's benefits with its lifecycle responsibilities.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 21:20

Pentagon Raises Combat Pay For First Time Since 2002 As Iran War Persists

Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,

The Pentagon has raised combat pay for US troops for the first time since 2002, Task & Purpose has reported, as the Iran war continues and another round of escalation between the US and Iran appears to be coming.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell announced the pay increase last week. "Our troops in harm’s way deserve compensation that reflects their risk. For the first time in over two decades, the Department of War is increasing Hostile Fire Pay and Imminent Danger Pay," he wrote on X.

Marine Corps file image

Parnell said that Hostile Fire Pay, which troops can receive if their base or unit comes under enemy fire, has been increased to $450 per month, double the previous amount.

Imminent Danger Pay, provided to troops "subject to the threat of physical harm or imminent danger," has increased to a maximum of $275 per month, up $50 from the previous rate. US troops can receive either Hostile Fire Pay or Imminent Danger Pay, but cannot receive both simultaneously.

While increasing combat pay, the Pentagon is also reducing the maximum amount troops can receive in Hardship Duty Pay-Location from $150 to $100 per month. The benefit compensates troops stationed in areas with particularly difficult living conditions, rather than for exposure to combat.

After the Iran war started, the Pentagon expanded the locations that are eligible for Imminent Danger Pay to include Arab states that host US bases, Turkey, Cyprus, the Greek island of Crete, the US base at Diego Garcia, and the waters of the Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, and Gulf of Oman.

Throughout the war in Iran, US bases across the Middle East have been pounded by Iranian missiles and drones, resulting in a significant number of US casualties, which have been downplayed by the Pentagon.

According to the Pentagon’s official numbers, since the US and Israel started the war with a sneak attack on Iran on February 28, at least 19 US troops have been killed, and 861 have been wounded.

——> Pentagon doubles combat pay for troops under fire • Hostile-fire pay jumps from $225 to $450 a month starting today • Imminent-danger pay rises to $275 as U.S. forces stay in Iran-related danger zones https://t.co/RxEXmaq53p

— Odisus (@Odisus) October 1, 2026

According to a recent report from The Washington Post, the Pentagon has not reported all of the US military deaths in the region since the conflict began. The report put the number of deaths of US service members at up to 23, though it said not all undisclosed deaths were directly tied to the conflict, and it also said that three civilian contractors have died.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 20:55

Canada Has The Nuclear Technology. Why Buy The Dependency?

Saskatchewan’s recent announcement envisages two large reactors supplying more than 2,000 MW in the northwest, potentially starting in 2042, plus at least 600 MW from small modular reactors near Estevan.

The ambition makes sense. The willingness to acquire more foreign dependencies… does not.

The list of potential vendors for large reactors is short:

• Westinghouse and its AP1000
• AtkinsRealis and Canadian CANDU technology

Will Canada import Westinghouse and their American reactor technology, or keep everything in-house with AtkinsRealis and the CANDU?

In today's era of national energy security, it's not exactly clear why Canadian leadership is taking more than 3 seconds to make the logical choice.

Saskatchewan is choosing between building their own homegrown reactor technology with an almost fully domesticated fuel and manufacturing supply chain, or instead, importing American nuclear technology and becoming reliant on US fuel and supply chain support for the next century.

Decisions, decisions…

While Westinghouse does wear a metaphorical red leaf on their collar (given their Canadian company ownership with Cameco and Brookfield), the AP1000 reactor technology is still American-based and is subject to export controls from the US.

On top of that, one of the biggest dependencies Canada will find themselves with is an additional need for uranium enrichment. They've already incurred a small amount of this pain with the BWRX-300 project at Darlington, but otherwise, the country runs on natural uranium due to the design of the CANDU reactor fleet.

One of the best features of the CANDU reactor is its heavy water moderator that allows it to use uranium enriched to as low as under 1% U-235, which is similar to the enrichment level of uranium that is pulled straight out of the ground. This allows the Canadian nuclear industry to largely skip the need for uranium enrichment, which is a painful bottleneck which will likely hold back the nuclear renaissance both in the U.S. and abroad.

The majority of the rest of the reactors in the world require the uranium that's used inside their cores to be enriched to somewhere between 3% and 5% U-235.

Why voluntarily add a strategic bottleneck to a system that already avoids it?

And while it's not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, the recent history of major nuclear projects in the two countries is painful to look at side by side.

The AP1000 reactors at Vogtle 3 and 4 in Georgia came in tens of billions of dollars over budget and years late. The sister project, VC Summer, wasn't even finished and was abandoned.

Compare that to the recent nuclear mega project of heavily refurbishing four CANDU reactors at the Darlington site. The project finished 4 months early and CAD$150m under budget. A similar refit at the Bruce site finished 7 months early and also under budget.

There may also be a political calculation here with the ongoing tariff fight. Canadian leaders could see an AP1000 order as a way to keep Trump happy and buy some breathing room. Westinghouse’s Canadian ownership would help sell the decision at home, while its American reactor technology would give Trump an export victory to advertise.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 20:30

Gunmen Attack Christian Town In Syria, Wounding Woman & Smashing Shops

Via The Cradle

Gunmen on motorcycles attacked the Christian town of Suqaylabiyah in the Hama countryside in Syria on Saturday, smashing shops and opening fire on residents, the Syrian Justice Archive (SJA) reported.

Armed men coming from the nearby Sunni town of Qalaat al-Madiq attacked Christian-owned shops and opened fire on residents with Kalashnikov rifles, wounding a woman on Al-Mashwar Road.

Source: Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch

The Syrian government's General Security forces reportedly allowed the armed men to pass through their checkpoints to enter Suqaylabiyah and did not intervene to stop the violence.

Instead, they launched an arrest campaign against local men who gathered to defend the town with sticks and knives. They arrested two local Christian men, Shadi Nassab and Amjad Lyous.
Meanwhile, Al-Ghab District Director Mohammad al-Attal told SANA that Internal Security Forces responded to the scene, brought the situation under control, and restored calm to the city.

Father Fadi Sankari of Saints Peter and Paul Church in Suqaylabiyah issued a statement on Facebook condemning the attacks and calling on residents to defend one another. "My dear children, what is happening in our parish today is unacceptable and condemned, and no one has the right to enter your homes or threaten your security and dignity," Sankari wrote.

"We don't want chaos, and we don't want revenge, but we also won't accept that our people live in fear, or that the tragedy of destruction we've known before repeats itself," he added.

He called on Syrian authorities to protect the town. "Your responsibility is to protect people, not to stand by watching fear and assault; and loose weapons cannot be a substitute for the rule of law."

Dozens of gunmen carried out a similar attack on Suqaylabiyah in March after an altercation broke out between local young men and young men from Qalaat al-Madiq. The fighting began after the young men from Qalaat al-Madiq began harassing two local women, causing the local young men to intervene.

Today, October 3, Christians in Syria were once again subjected to violence and attacks against their people and property. Islamist mobs attacked Christians and their property in Al-Suqaylabiyah, in the heart of Syria’s historic Orthodox Christian presence, with members of the General Security participating in the attack instead of protecting the community. This is what Syria’s Christians are enduring today: attacks on people, homes, businesses, churches, and communities that have existed on this land for centuries. What happened today is not something that should pass unnoticed. It must be documented, those responsible must be held accountable, and the involvement of security forces must be investigated. Syria’s Christians are not guests in Syria. This is their ancestral homeland.

— Greco-Levantines World Wide (@GrecoLevantines) October 3, 2026

Shortly after the altercation was broken up, five youths from Qalaat al-Madiq arrived, armed with sticks and knives, and began breaking and smashing shops. They were soon joined by dozens of other armed men who beat residents with sticks and opened fire with weapons at shops, restaurants, and cafes.

General Security personnel refrained from intervening or, at times, accompanied groups of the attackers.

Saturday's attack on Suqaylabiyah comes days after the brutal killing of eight Alawite men from the town of Al-Fahel in the Hama countryside.

Gunmen opened fire on the men as they traveled by bus near the town of Masyaf on 30 September. All passengers on the bus were engineers and workers from Al-Mateen Company.

In January 2025, Sunni-extremist gunmen linked to Syria's new government massacred 16 Alawite men in Al-Fahel during a raid and search of the village.

Two months later, on March 7 2025, Sunni extremists and government security forces carried out a massacre across dozens of locations on the Syrian coast, killing over 1,600 Alawite civilians. The same groups carried out a similar massacre of Druze in Suwayda governorate in July of the same year.

✝️🇸🇾Destruction of a Virgin Mary statue and looting of Christian-owned shops in Al-Suqaylabiyah by groups affiliated with transitional authorities in the “New Syria”. https://t.co/yxjqDKbtoy

— ☧ Milad ܝܠܕܐ (@PalCatholic) March 27, 2026

Religious minorities from the Alawite, Christian, and Druze communities have been regularly targeted by Sunni extremists linked to Syrian security forces since Syria's new government took power in October 2024.

The new government in Damascus is led by Ahmad al-Sharaa, a former leader of Al-Qaeda in Syria who enjoys strong backing from the US, UK, and Turkey.

Sharaa and members of his previous armed group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), are Sunni extremists who believe that Christians should be discriminated against and that Alawites and Druze should be killed and their property taken, according to the teachings of the medieval religious scholar Ibn Taymiyyah.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 20:05

DOJ Sues University Of Delaware: Illegal Aliens Get In-State Tuition, Out-Of-State Americans Pay 2.7x More

The Justice Department has sued the University of Delaware, alleging the school "grants in-state tuition for illegal aliens while denying reduced tuition to U.S. citizens."

The math comes straight from UD's own 2026-27 cost-of-attendance page. Undergraduate tuition for Delaware residents is $15,740. For non-residents it is $42,470.

A qualifying illegal alien who went to high school in Delaware pays the first number. A US citizen from Pennsylvania or Maryland pays the second. That is a $26,730-a-year premium for the crime of being an American from the wrong state, or roughly $107,000 over four years at current rates, before fees.

To qualify, according to NBC Philadelphia, a non-citizen must have attended a Delaware high school for at least three years, graduated there or earned a GED, lived with a legal guardian while in school, enrolled at UD within 18 months of graduating, and provided evidence of permanent residency or an application for U.S. citizenship.

Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward Jr. said:

"This Department of Justice's efforts will not cease until we have challenged every state law or university policy that gives preferential treatment to illegal aliens over our Nation's own citizens. Congress long ago made clear that states cannot give reduced tuition to illegal aliens not available to all Americans."

Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate added that "colleges cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens," and that the department "will not tolerate American students being treated like second-class citizens in their own country."

Delaware is the 26th such lawsuit from the Trump DOJ. The department says it has already secured favorable court orders against six states: Texas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Illinois and Kansas.

UD, for its part, said it is "aware of the complaint" and "reviewing it carefully," and declined further comment on a pending legal matter.

Not every challenge has gone DOJ's way: in March, a federal judge dismissed the department's suit against Minnesota's tuition policy with prejudice.

OCTOBER ONLY.$10 OFFYOUR NEXT ORDER.$30 min. Ends Oct 31. One per customer.GET MY $10 OFF →Signs you up for ZeroHedge Store emails. Can't be combined. Every order helps support ZeroHedge. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 19:40

Backlash Rolls In After Rutgers Womxns Rugby Name Change Welcomes Men Who Identify As Female

Authored by Jennifer Kabbany via The College Fix,

A female recreational rugby team at Rutgers University is facing backlash for changing its name to "Rutgers Womxn's Rugby" to signify inclusion and the intent to allow biological males who identity as female to play on the team.

The criticism was swift and severe, prompting the student-run team to turn off the comment section of its announcement on Instagram before deleting the post completely.

However, while the announcement was deleted, the team's account name remains "Rutgers Womxn's Rugby." Its original Sept. 24 post had stated:

We're excited to announce that Rutgers Women's Rugby will be making the change to Rutgers Womxn's Rugby! This change reflects our team's commitment to creating a welcoming, inclusive and supportive environment for our players. Inclusivity is an important part of who we are, and we want every member of our team to feel valued and represented through our organization. We are continuously evolving and want to properly reflect the standards of inclusion. We're proud to continue building a rugby community where everyone belongs."

But Fox News reported that World Rugby "bans biological males from women's divisions, pointing to clear science showing extreme injury risks during hard tackles. Rebranding a student club is easy, but letting biological males into female sports divisions lands universities in hot legal water."

Fair For All, a group fighting to protect women's sports, pointed out that "Depending on what 'Womxn' includes, the substantive change could also be a violation of Title IX."

Rutgers Women's Rugby Team is renaming themselves as "Womxn's Rugby Team" to be inclusive.

Is @RutgersRugby Men's Team also changing its name to Mxn's Rugby Team?

Why is female sports the only battleground for ideological push to include those outside of the female sex... pic.twitter.com/j4WMRrQybF

— Fair For All (@fairforall_org) September 25, 2026

"Inclusion of athletes who are not women is not fair to women and will not make female athletes feel valued. Female athletes will opportunities and will be excluded. When that happens, they will not feel welcomed or represented," the group added.

The Post Millennial reported that several club women's rugby teams across the country have "ditched the women's category in favor of a newly created 'open' category so men can play on their women's teams."

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 19:15

Guinness Pulls Plug On Baltimore Brewery As Costs Soar In Democrat-Run State Amid Consumer Beer Retreat

The first Guinness brewery to open in the US in more than 60 years, located in the Baltimore metro area, will shutter operations next month as shifting consumer demand and the challenges of operating in the Democrat-run state have made the operation increasingly difficult to sustain.

Diageo, the British alcoholic-beverages company that owns Guinness, operated the brewery for eight years, during which the site attracted more than 2 million visitors.

Local outlet WMAR-TV reported that the shutdown is due to soaring operating costs, shifting consumer tastes and broader economic pressures that made the brewing location unsustainable.

The decision followed a "careful review of our operations and long-term business priorities," a Diageo spokesperson said.

The shutdown comes three years after Diageo slashed the workforce at the Halethorpe site by 100 jobs and ended most commercial brewing at the plant. Its taproom, restaurant, beer garden and experimental brewery remained open.

This closure leaves Chicago as the brand's only US brewery and raises a difficult question about whether shifts in consumer demand for beer are only one part of the story.

The other part of the story is easy to understand: Maryland faces competitive pressure from neighboring states. Its negative net migration only suggests that the Democratic kings and queens who control the state under one-party rule are running its economy into the ground.

Neighboring states are cutting taxes or adopting flat-tax systems, while lefty Annapolis lawmakers are hell-bent on a parasitic mission to extract as much tax money as possible from mom-and-pop businesses, medium-sized and large companies, and taxpayers to pay for their progressive experiments. 

The result of lefty activists running the state is negative net migration, and the latest example of these state-killing economic policies is a major brewer shuttering operations.

OCTOBER ONLY.$10 OFFYOUR NEXT ORDER.$30 min. Ends Oct 31. One per customer.GET MY $10 OFF →Signs you up for ZeroHedge Store emails. Can't be combined. Every order helps support ZeroHedge. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 18:50

America's Wile E. Coyote Moment

Authored by Matthew Piepenburg via VonGreyerz.gold,

When it comes to contextualizing the tech, bond, gold and policy headlines of Q4 2026, it's easier to foresee their pathway ahead by first looking backwards. Once understood, we mathematically realize that our problems are not in the future, they are right now.

The 1970s

Ah, the 1970s. It was an era of bellbottom jeans, checkered suits, wide ties, the music of ABBA and Saturday morning cartoons.

It was also the decade in which Nixon decoupled the dollar and ended the sound money hopes of America's founding fathers.

Backed by nothing but "full faith and credit," the USD began its slow but steady death by a thousand cuts of borrow and spend without limit or concern.

Free a golden chaperone, politicians and Fed Chairs of every political stripe could expand balance sheets and the M2 money supply with almost zero concern for the longer-term financial karma that always follows a bacchanalian debt spree paid for with dollars literally created out of thin air.

Government debt, at $238B in 1971, was no big deal to our so-called "experts."

Besides, any future debts could be easily paid at this dawn of generational fantasy, which Hemingway described as the "temporary prosperity" of excess money printing masquerading as careful policy.

A Time Without Foresight (or Restraint)

In short, no one in the 1970's was thinking of what it might be like by 2026 when that same government debt had skyrocketed from a couple hundred billion to over $40T.

Instead, post-1971 leadership, red or blue, focused on the next election cycle rather than the next generation's purchasing power.

As holder of the world reserve currency, DC enjoyed what the French Finance Minister of 1965 described as the "exorbitant privilege" of simply exporting its reserve currency and inflation to the rest of the world.

This may have been inherently unfair to the rest of that world, but as our then Treasury Secretary, John Connally, famously quipped: "It's our currency but your problem."

Buying Time with Funky Policies

To insure that "problem," we effectively forced OPEC to sell its oil in USD, and even made the producers of this oil spend large chunks of their revenues on our USTs. This made oil a critical sponge to absorb our reckless and inflationary spending.

As Mel Brooks would say, it sure was "good to be the king" - or at least King Dollar.

And just in case a rising gold price might otherwise embarrass our nothing-backed dollar, we also made sure in the mid-70s to create a price-fixing mechanism at the COMEX to legally manipulate the paper price of this far more precious and honest metal.

Yep. That was the 1970's.

What could possibly go wrong?

Well... just about everything.

Some fifty years later, we now see a world de-dollarizing, a petrodollar fracturing, missiles flying and the dollar emerging no longer as just the world's problem, but America's as well.

Back to the Future

Fast-forward to 2026 and the foregoing "exorbitant privilege" and "temporary prosperity" has devolved into what Hemingway also foresaw as this debt-n-spend fantasy's final endgame, namely the "permanent ruin of currency debasement and war."

Of course, there are defenders of American Exceptionalism who would take offence to words like "permanent ruin" from gold bugs just "selling their book."

After all, there's so much to save us. Just look at the record-high S&P. Look at technology. Look at AI. Look at the milkshake theory's immortal dollar. Look at all the Fed's brilliant PhDs and magical task forces. Look at stablecoins.

Ok. Let's look.

The Great AI Gambit

As for the S&P 500, it's nearing all-time highs, but 440 of its 500 companies are down more than 20% from their 52-week highs.

Rather than a stock market, we have a concentrated minority of tech monopoly powers holding the rest of the broken pack together with techy duct tape and memes of "this time is different with AI."

The core and leading big names in tech, namely Google, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft, are part of the biggest AI circular financing and concentration risk gambit in the history of U.S. equity markets.

These hyper-scalers get 70% of their AI revenues from just two players, Anthropic and OpenAI, two profitless companies whose costs are billions greater than their revenues.

These two screaming examples of concentration risk are bleeding money at an historical scale. Even AI's own search results confirm the same:

From Concentration Risk to Circular Financing

And if you are wondering how Anthropic and OpenAI are funded, it's not from big VC names.

Actually, the bulk of their equity (over 700B in 2026 AI capex alone) is coming from the very same companies (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, SoftBank and Nvidia) they sell their un-moted software to...

Even more alarming, these same tech hyper-scalers which keep the two AI ships afloat are themselves burning cash at a record pace on data centers whose costs (and power problems) are killing their cash flows.

Given this circular, financed, uber-concentrated and just massive capex profile and daisy chain, AI is literally becoming too big to fail.

The very survival of our economy and stock market is now being gambled on a single AI play whose profitable future is anything but certain unless the government regulates a duopoly protective measure to keep China out of OpenAI and Anthropic's backyard, at which point the U.S. won't be getting rare earths from Asia any more...

NVDA to the Rescue?

But surely Nvidia's GPU sales will save the day, right? Its earnings are indeed impressive, and it just posted 110% revenue growth. Wow.

But if you look more carefully at Nvidia's 10Q form (and the notes behind it), you'll also see that 70% of its accounts receivables come from just five companies (listed above).

Do you see the circular concentration risk? Do you see the massive gambit the S&P is playing on the entire economy if this AI dice-roll (priced for perfection) doesn't go as planned?

For now, the great AI gambit has yet to play out. But the memory of tech bubbles transitioning from over-bought to over-sold is still very fresh in my dot.com-trading mind...

The Bond Market's Verdict

But if we move from a profitless AI, circular-financed, and grotesquely concentrated and uncertain U.S. tech bubble to a shattered U.S. sovereign bond market, the suspense is less severe in a nation running $2T in annual deficits.

In fact, when it comes to bonds, the verdict is already obvious.

As the great American bond king, Jeffrey Gundlach, so aptly described it: "We've hit peak lunacy" in our sovereign bond market.

With the 10Y UST yield crossing the 5% "uh-oh" Rubicon in a public debt backdrop of $40T, I see a death penalty for the dollar's purchasing power and a Treasury Secretary with zero parole options.

With Scott Bessent having recently added David Zervos and Judy Shelton to his "dream team," the set-up is now clear for some major changes - and desperation - ahead.

Meanwhile, DC mouthpieces like Kevin Warsh avoid direct answers as to how Uncle Sam can afford his interest expense or how we got to 5.25% yields by October when they were at 4.4% when he took office in June.

Yields rise as inflation rises, so the war in Iran, which has sent Brent crude to painful highs, is the most common explanation for how our pre-war yields of 3.9% have now crossed above the fatal 5%-handle.

But the real issue (i.e., criminal evidence) behind the rising shark fins of these rising yields lies in U.S. bond issuance at extreme levels at the same time demand for the same has hit extreme lows.

As more deleverage-focused nations dump our debt to support their currencies or buy spiking oil, those Treasury yields just keep rising - and will rise even higher once the USA confesses it's already in a recession.

The world's trust in an over-issued, distrusted, debt-soaked, and weaponized UST has fallen from incremental to exponential levels. The premium (i.e., rate) for U.S. IOUs will only continue to climb higher as our deficits do the same.

Signals: This Ain't Our Father's Bond Market

The post-2020 Treasury market is not what it used to be since 1980, and it won't be coming back. The once sacred Treasury market is mathematically broken, which means DC is objectively unhinged.

Between September of 2024 and January of 2026, the Fed, having failed to beat inflation via hawkish rate hikes in 2022 and 2023, then dovishly cut rates by 175 basis points.

In normal bond markets, such cuts are supposed to send yields down. Instead, yields went up across the entire duration range of the yield curve.

Such yield indicators may seem boring to those unfamiliar with bond market lingo while doom-scrolling their iPhones, but it confirms that the Fed has lost control of rates, and hence the cost of his unpayable sovereign bar tab.

And it gets worse.

Since 2000, we've seen 13 market corrections. And in the first 12 of those 13 corrections, the dollar always went up (on a DXY basis) by at least 8%. But on the 13th correction last April, when stocks lost 18%, the dollar, rather than go up, went down even as yields spiked.

That's not normal...

In this new abnormal, USTs sell off as stocks sell off, and the grossly over-produced (i.e., debased) USD, even in a rising yield setting, can't strengthen.

There is no safe-haven in the so-called "risk-free return" of a U.S. IOU which, when measured against honest rather the Fed-measured inflation, is nothing more than "return-free-risk."

In short, we are in a different bond regime. The old rules, correlations and tricks no longer apply.

Our bond market is openly broken.

The only way to bring these yields down to a survivable/payable level is either: 1) money printing to the moon; or 2) a massive debt restructuring, either of which option means further dollar destruction and hence screaming tailwinds for gold.

Credit Default Masquerading as a "Re-Structuring"?

As for "restructuring," the recent addition of Shelton and Dervos is telling.

Shelton, of course, understands the fall from grace of USTs. She knows that a gold-backed long bond has more credibility than a dollar-backed IOU for the simple reason that our debased dollar is now obvious (and embarrassing) to everyone, including those nations not showing up at our Treasury auctions.

But even a gold-backed 50Y UST is not gonna save the Treasury market. Too little, too late.

Like Gundlach, I feel the Fed and Treasury Dept will buy time with some serious YCC by issuing more debt from the short end in a desperate Operation Twist 2.0 attempt to compress yields on the long end.

But that's not working so well, is it?

And also like Gundlach, I believe the next desperate act could very likely involve a clever "restructuring" of our sovereign IOUs which boils down to little more than a constructive default on our debt.

That is, at some point down the road, and in the oh-so convenient name of "national security" (blamed, of course, on some foreign bad guy or black swan event), DC will simply announce an extension of bond maturities and a capping of bond coupons at 1%.

This, of course, will crush bondholders, foreign and domestic, as well as pension funds, insurance companies, money markets and the man on the street. It will also mean a massive price fall (and riot) in bonds and no global love for Uncle Sam's IOUs.

But hey, desperate times require desperate actions.

Under such "restructuring," DC would be forced to stop issuing debt and rebalance its budget. It would also mean a tanking USD, which is precisely what DC needs to inflate away its debt and gain some yardage in its trade deficit.

All Roads (Still) Lead to Gold

Thus, whether we mouse-click more trillions to save (self-fund) the bond market or restructure USTs with capped coupons, the net result either way is a neutered USD and hence a ripping gold price in the years to come, at least for those who can think that far ahead.

This further explains why central banks, which have been stacking the metal at an historical pace in 2026, now hold more gold than USTs.

They see the direction (and desperation) of the USD, and hence the direction of gold.

The Wile E. Coyote Moment is Now

Thus, as we watch the bond market die on a DC respirator while AI stocks gyrate in a profitless circle of over-investment and narrative changes which will most likely require government regulation to mote/protect the hyper-scalers and over-hyped AI providers from another 08-like catastrophe, I'm done warning of a broken U.S. credit and equity disaster on the horizon.

This is because the "Uh-Oh" moment is not coming; it's already here.

Based on the dispositive yet largely ignored signals from our anemic, concentrated and over-levered stock market; and based on our openly broken, unpayable bond market (not to mention the private credit time bomb) in search of a liquidity miracle or default policy that further debases our Greenback, the picture is clear.

Warsh, Bessent and Shelton are not going to save this credit market. Nor will Santa Claus or any other miracle trick. It's too late, folks.

In fact, the picture or image I have in mind takes me/us right back to the 1970's and those Saturday morning cartoons I alluded to above - and watched as a kid while Nixon and his successors set the current disaster in motion decades before I traded my first dot.com stock...

American credits, equities, monetary fantasies and ignored Main Street realities have already passed beyond the cliff. We now stare suspended above a fall that is no longer theoretical, but right below us.

Of course, in such moments, it's scary to look down, and thus almost no one does.

OCTOBER ONLY.$10 OFFYOUR NEXT ORDER.$30 min. Ends Oct 31. One per customer.GET MY $10 OFF →Signs you up for ZeroHedge Store emails. Can't be combined. Every order helps support ZeroHedge. Tyler Durden Mon, 10/05/2026 - 18:25